Bilingual Teacher Shortage Threatens Students’ Bilingual Opportunity

Every year, California’s governor and Legislature adopt a state budget that provides a framework and funding for critical public services and systems — from child care and health care to housing and transportation to colleges and K-12 schools.

But the state budget is about more than dollars and cents.

The budget expresses our values as well as our priorities for Californians and as a state. At its best, the budget should reflect our collective efforts to expand economic opportunities, promote well-being, and improve the lives of Californians who are denied the chance to share in our state’s wealth and who deserve the dignity and support to lead thriving lives.

State budget choices have an impact on all Californians and these decisions are particularly important for the nearly 6 million students in California’s K-12 public schools. Because the state budget provides
the majority of funding that K-12 public schools receive each year, it is critical for Californians to understand and participate in the annual budget process to ensure that state leaders are making the strategic choices needed to allow every K-12 student — from different races, backgrounds, and places — to thrive and share in our state’s economic and social life.

This guide sheds light on the state budget, the budget process, and why they matter for K-12 students and schools with the goal of giving Californians the tools needed to effectively engage decision makers and advocate for fair and just policy choices.

Key Takeaways

California’s State Budget & Why It Matters for K-12 School Funding

The State Budget Consists of Three Types of State Funds

The Largest Share of State General Fund Spending Supports K-12 Education

Under the enacted 2022-23 state budget:

• Nearly one-third of General Fund dollars (33.1%) supports K-12 education.
• Almost 3 out of every 10 General Fund dollars (29.3%) pays for health and human services.
• Roughly 1 out of every 10 General Fund dollars (10.1%) goes to higher education.
• Less than 1 out of every 10 General Fund dollars (6.3%) supports corrections, primarily the state prison system.
• More than 1 out of 5 General Fund dollars (21.3%) goes to other essential services and institutions, such as transportation, environmental protection, the state’s court system, and so-called “General Government,” which consists of a variety of statewide expenses such as emergency expenditures.

Most General Fund Revenues Come From Three State Taxes

More than 9 out of every 10 General Fund dollars (just over 94%) under the enacted
2022-23 state budget are projected to come from:

• The personal income tax (61.8%),
• The corporation tax (17.3%); and
• Sales and use taxes (15.3%)

The remaining General Fund dollars in 2022-23 are projected to come from smaller state revenue sources (5.7%), such as insurance and cigarette taxes.

The Majority of K-12 Education Funding Comes From the State

In 2020-21, K-12 school districts and county offices of education received:

• More than half of their dollars (nearly 56%) from the state;
• Nearly one-quarter of their dollars (24.6%) from local property taxes;
• More than 1 in 10 (13.1%) of their dollars from the federal government, which included funding to mitigate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic; and
• Only 6.5% of their dollars from other local sources of revenue, such as parcel taxes and fees for the use of school buildings.

Most K-12 Education Funding Is Allocated Through the Local Control Funding Formula

The Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) is the primary funding formula for K-12 school districts and county offices of education.

• State policymakers fundamentally restructured the state’s K-12 education finance system when they enacted the LCFF in 2013.
• The LCFF is an equity-based formula that provides a base grant per K-12 student, adjusted to reflect the number of students at various grade levels, as well as additional grants for English learners, students from low-income families, and foster youth.
• The Legislature determines LCFF grant levels in the annual state budget.

LCFF Dollars Come From the State and from Local Property Taxes

In 2020-21, nearly 2 out of every 3 dollars (66.2%) that K-12 school districts and county offices of education received were allocated through the LCFF.

• Slightly less than two-thirds of LCFF dollars came from the state and slightly more than one-third came from local property taxes.

State Budget and Policy Choices Are Key to Determining the Allocation of K-12 School Funding

The state budget provides most of the funds that K-12 schools use to educate California’s 5.9 million K-12 students.

• These funds go to more than 1,000 school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools.

The size of the state budget is a key factor that determines the total amount of annual funding K-12 schools receive.

• However, the Legislature and governor decide how these state funds are allocated across the state.

Understanding the financial resources available to K-12 schools requires familiarity with the state budget and the state budget process.

Terms and Definition

The Constitutional Framework

The governor and legislators craft the state’s annual spending plan according to rules outlined in the state Constitution.

California voters periodically revise these rules by approving constitutional amendments that appear on the statewide ballot.

• Proposals to amend the state Constitution can be placed on the ballot through a citizens’ initiative or by the Legislature.
• A constitutional amendment takes effect if approved by a simple majority of voters.

Proposition 25: Simple Majority Vote for Budget Bill and Most Budget-Related Bills

The budget package generally may be passed by a simple majority vote of each
house of the Legislature.

• Prop. 25 of 2010 allows lawmakers to pass, by a simple majority vote, the budget bill as well as certain budget-related bills (“trailer bills”) that may take effect as soon as the governor signs them. Typically, the budget package consists entirely or primarily of such majority-vote bills.
• To qualify as a budget-related bill under Prop. 25, a bill must (1) be listed in the budget bill and (2) contain an appropriation of any amount.
• The budget package may include bills that require a two-thirds vote of each house, such as bills to raise taxes or to place constitutional amendments or general obligation bonds before the voters.

Proposition 26: Supermajority Vote for Tax Increases

Any tax increase requires a two-thirds vote of each house of the Legislature.

• Under the state Constitution, “any change in state statute which results in any taxpayer paying a higher tax” requires a two-thirds vote of each house.
• This standard was imposed by Prop. 26 of 2010. This measure expanded the definition of a tax increase and thus the scope of the two-thirds vote requirement, which was originally imposed by Prop. 13 of 1978.
• Prior to Prop. 26, only bills changing state taxes “for the purpose of increasing revenues” required a two-thirds vote. Bills that increased some taxes but reduced others by an equal or larger amount could be passed by a simple majority vote of each house.

Additional Supermajority Vote Requirements

The state Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of each house of the Legislature in order to:

• Appropriate money from the General Fund, except for appropriations that are for public schools or that are included in the budget bill or in budget-related bills that meet the requirements of Prop. 25.
• Pass bills that take effect immediately (urgency statutes), except for the budget bill and Prop. 25 budget-related bills.
• Place constitutional amendments or general obligation bond measures before the voters.
• Override the governor’s veto of a bill or an item of appropriation.

Proposition 98: A Funding Guarantee for K-12 Schools and Community Colleges

Prop. 98 of 1988 guarantees a minimum annual level of funding for K-14 education.

• The amount of the guarantee is calculated each year based on one of three tests that apply under varying fiscal and economic conditions. Two of these tests include adjustments for changes in statewide K-12 attendance. Prop. 98 funding comes from the state General Fund and local property tax revenues.
• The Legislature can suspend the guarantee for a single year by a two-thirds vote of each house and provide less funding. Following a suspension, the state must increase Prop. 98 funding over time to the level that it would have reached absent the suspension.
• While the Legislature can provide more funding than Prop. 98 requires the guarantee has generally served as a maximum funding level.

Proposition 2: A Budget Reserve for K-14 Education

Prop. 2 of 2014 also created a state budget reserve for K-12 schools and community colleges called the Public School System Stabilization Account (PSSSA).

• Deposits come from state capital gains tax revenues in years when those revenues are particularly strong.
• However, various conditions must be met before these dollars could be transferred to the PSSSA. For example, transfers could occur only in so-called “Test 1” years under Prop. 98, which have been rare.

Proposition 55: Potential New Funding for Medi-Cal from a Tax on the Wealthiest Californians

Prop. 55 of 2016 extends, through 2030, personal income tax rate increases on very high-income Californians and establishes a formula to boost funding for Medi-Cal, which provides health care services to Californians with low incomes.

• Starting in 2018-19, General Fund revenues — including those raised by Prop. 55 — must first be used to fund (1) the annual Prop. 98 guarantee for K-12 schools and community colleges and (2) the cost of other services that were authorized as of January 1, 2016, as adjusted for population changes, federal mandates, and other factors.
• If any Prop. 55 revenues remain after meeting these required expenditures, Medi-Cal would receive 50% of this excess, up to a maximum of $2 billion in any fiscal year.
• Prop. 55 has not yet resulted in any additional funding for Medi-Cal.

State Appropriations Limit (SAL): A Cap on Spending

Appropriations are subject to a limit established by Prop. 4 of 1979, as modified by later initiatives. This spending cap is often called the Gann Limit.

• The SAL limits the amount of state tax proceeds that can be appropriated each year. This limit is adjusted annually for changes in population and per capita personal income.
• Some appropriations from tax proceeds do not count toward the limit, including debt service and spending that is needed to comply with court or federal mandates.
• Revenues that exceed the SAL over a two-year period are divided equally between Prop. 98 spending and taxpayer rebates. The state last exceeded the SAL in 2020-21 (but did not do so in the prior year).

What do the Governor and the Legislature Do?

What Happens When?

The state budget process is cyclical. Decisions are made throughout the year.

State Budget Resources

• Department of Finance: The governor’s budget proposals and related documents.
• Legislative Analyst’s Office: Budget and policy analyses, budget recommendations, and historical budget data.
• Legislative Counsel: Bills and bill analyses, a free bill-tracking service, the state codes, and the state Constitution.
• State Assembly and Senate: Committee agendas and other publications, floor session and committee schedules, the annual legislative calendar, and live audio streaming of legislative proceedings.

Support for this report was provided by the Sobrato Family Foundation and the Stuart Foundation.