Skip to content

Download the PDF version of this Fact Sheet.

Support for this Fact Sheet was provided by First 5 California.

Child care keeps parents working and families afloat, yet the high cost of care across California often forces parents to make difficult choices about who cares for their child while they go to work. This can be detrimental for families with low incomes, who often struggle to simply afford the basics. California’s subsidized child care and development system is designed to serve families with low and moderate incomes, but there are far more children eligible for subsidized child care than what is funded by the state and federal governments.[1] This means that families with few resources are often unable to secure affordable care for their children.

In 2017, just 1 in 9 children eligible for subsidized child care and development programs in California were enrolled in a program that could accommodate families for more than a couple hours per day and throughout the entire year.[2] According to a Budget Center analysis of federal survey data, an estimated 2 million children from birth through age 12 were eligible for care, but only 228,100 were able to participate in a subsidized full-day, full-year program.[3] This mismatch between eligibility for care and available spaces largely reflects inadequate state and federal funding. Moreover, decades of wage stagnation has dampened families’ incomes, making it difficult to afford the high cost of child care.[4] In fact, in 2017, roughly 1 out of 3 California workers with children earned low wages. [5]

State and federal policymakers have begun to increase funding for subsidized child care and development programs in recent years.[6] In California, policymakers have incrementally increased the number of spaces for children and boosted provider payment rates. State policymakers also took an important step forward by updating the decade-old income eligibility limits and implementing a 12-month eligibility period. These positive changes were long overdue and allow families to retain subsidized care for their children while they build a secure economic foundation for their families. However, these changes also mean that the small share of families receiving care remain eligible for longer periods of time, while substantially more families have become eligible. Without additional investments in new spaces for children, these changes could further limit access for low-income families.

Governor Newsom’s proposed 2019-20 budget includes a large investment in young children. However, while the proposal expands full-day, full-year preschool and sets aside hundreds of millions of dollars in one-time funding for subsidized child care facilities and teacher training, it does not immediately expand access to subsidized child care programs for children from low- and moderate-income families, instead signaling that the Administration intends to significantly expand the number of children served in the years ahead. Since some parents have been waiting for child care for years, substantial investment in California’s subsidized child care and development system must include increased access to child care programs for children and families.

This analysis is the first part of a multiphase effort to analyze subsidized child care and development programs in California. Future phases of this work will examine the unmet need for subsidized child care across different age groups and by race and ethnicity.


[1] Families are eligible for subsidized child care if the child who would receive care is under the age of 13; the family establishes an appropriate eligibility status, such as by having an income below the limit set by the state; and the family demonstrates a need for care, such as parental employment. Families generally must meet the same income guidelines applicable to child care to qualify for the California State Preschool Program (CSPP), which is funded solely with state dollars. State law, however, allows up to 10% of families in the state preschool program to have incomes up to 15% above the income eligibility limit, but only after all other eligible children have been enrolled. The CSPP is a part-day program offered for roughly nine months of the year. Some children receive “wraparound” services that provide subsidized child care for the remainder of the day and throughout the entire year. To be eligible for the full-day CSPP, families generally must meet the same guidelines regarding eligibility status that are applicable to subsidized child care.

[2] Budget Center analysis of US Census Bureau, American Community Survey data. Data limitations likely result in a conservative estimate of the number of children in California who are eligible for subsidized child care. For more information about the methodology used to calculate this estimate, see the Technical Appendix.

[3] The 228,100 figure reflects children enrolled in the full-day CSPP or in one of the following subsidized child care programs: Alternative Payment Program; CalWORKs Stages One, Two, or Three; Family Child Care Home Network; General Child Care; and the Migrant Child Care and Development Program. Enrollment is for October 2017, except for California Community College CalWORKs Stage Two, which reflects a Department of Finance estimate for the 2017-18 fiscal year. This analysis also includes the full-day CSPP, which consists of part-day preschool and “wraparound” child care, because it accommodates many — although not all — families’ work schedules throughout the year, and thus approximates the experience that a child would have in a subsidized child care program. In contrast, this analysis excludes roughly 97,000 children who were enrolled in the part-day CSPP, without access to wraparound child care, in October 2017. This is because most families with low and moderate incomes likely need wraparound care in order to supplement the CSPP’s part-day, part-year schedule. This analysis reports enrollment data for a single month — as opposed to a monthly average for 2017 — because the California Department of Education (CDE) does not typically separate part-day and full-day CSPP enrollment when reporting monthly averages for a single fiscal year. The CDE also states, “Caution should be used when interpreting monthly averages as some programs do not operate at full capacity throughout the entire year (e.g., State Preschool) while other programs have seasonal fluctuations in enrollment (e.g., Migrant Child Care).” Finally, the data are for October 2017 because the CDE’s point-in-time reports are only available for the month of October.

[4] See Amy Rose, Modest Gains for California’s Low- and Midwage Workers (California Budget & Policy Center: January 2018).

[5] Estimate based on data from the University of California Berkeley Labor Center, Low-Wage Work in California (August 2018). “Low wage” is defined as earning less than $14.35 per hour.

[6] Kristin Schumacher, Dollars for Child Care and Preschool in 2018-19 Near Pre-Recession Levels With Boost From One-Time Funding (California Budget & Policy Center: September 2018).

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

For the California Alternative Payment Program Association’s Child Care Advocacy Day, Senior Policy Analyst Kristin Schumacher presented on what’s included in Governor Newsom’s 2019-20 state budget proposal that will impact families and children.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

For EveryChild California’s annual state budget update, Senior Policy Analyst Kristin Schumacher presented on funding for early care and education in the 2019-20 state budget proposal.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

The Budget Center hosted a webinar to discuss Governor Newsom’s plans to significantly invest in young children and families. As part of our Policy Perspectives Speakers Series, this webinar featured First 5 California’s Camille Maben and the Budget Center’s Kristin Schumacher and Esi Hutchful discussing key context and insights on investments in the 2019-20 state budget proposal that impact children and families, such as home visiting, subsidized child care, paid family leave, and the CalWORKs program.

View the presentation slide deck. 

View the Fact Sheet on unmet need in subsidized child care in California, highlighted during the webinar. 

View the webinar recording:

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities’ annual conference, Impact 2018: Building Momentum for Equity and Opportunity, brought together members of the State Priorities Partnership (SPP), a network of independent, nonprofit research and policy organizations representing more than 40 states, and others interested in state policy. Executive Director Chris Hoene presented to the SPP Leadership Institute on the results of a strategic planning retreat he attended earlier this year and also introduced the conference’s closing plenary speaker, Professor Manuel Pastor of USC. Also, Steven Bliss, Director of Strategic Communications, presented “Using Digital Tools to Expand Reach and Engagement” for the workshop “Digital Advocacy 101.”

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Download the PDF version of this Fact Sheet.

For the fifth year in a row, funding for California’s subsidized child care and development system has increased. This system provides critical child care and early learning opportunities for a limited number of children from low- and moderate-income families, but state funding was cut dramatically during and after the Great Recession, while federal funding for subsidized child care remained relatively flat.[1] This meant that fewer children and families received subsidized care than prior to the onset of the Great Recession. However, state policymakers have incrementally reinvested in these programs and services beginning with the 2014-15 state fiscal year, and bipartisan support for subsidized child care at the federal level has resulted in newly available federal funds, as well. Due to these investments, after adjusting for inflation, overall funding for California’s subsidized child care and development system in the 2018-19 fiscal year is $3.887 billion, 15% greater than in 2017-18 ($3.375 billion), and nearly even with funding levels in 2007-08, prior to the onset of the Great Recession (see chart).

The 2018-19 budget includes state funds to add 2,100 Alternative Payment Program (AP) child care slots, as well as 2,959 full-day state preschool slots, as agreed upon in the 2016-17 budget agreement. This year’s budget also adds 11,307 time-limited AP child care slots with newly available federal funds.[2] The 2018-19 budget also increases payment rates for providers that contract directly with the state, including an additional increase specifically for the care of infants, toddlers, and children with special needs. Still, despite the increase in state and federal resources, overall funding for subsidized child care and preschool slots in 2018-19 ($3.522 billion) is still nearly $250 million lower than in 2007-08 ($3.771 billion), prior to the onset of the Great Recession, after adjusting for inflation.

In contrast, total funding for programs and activities designed to boost the quality or support the administration of subsidized child care and preschool programs has increased dramatically.[3] These “quality and support programs” include a range of items such as the Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) and funding for the Resource and Referral Network. Total funding for quality and support programs in 2018-19 is $365 million — an increase of 143% compared to 2017-18, after adjusting for inflation. This dramatic increase is primarily due to the new Inclusive Early Care and Education Expansion Program, which was funded with $167 million in one-time Proposition 98 funds that are to be administered through the 2022-23 fiscal year.

While funding for certain quality-boosting activities has increased, funding for other activities that fall within the quality and support category has decreased or been eliminated. For example, the state funded Centralized Eligibility Lists (CELs) with about $8 million for the maintenance of county-level waiting lists for subsidized slots, but funding for CELs was redirected to child care programs in 2011-12 to mitigate the effects of deep budget cuts. Policymakers have not restored funding for this service. In addition, even though funding for the Resource and Referral Network has remained relatively stable at roughly $19 million annually since 2007-08, funding has actually decreased by nearly one-fifth (19%) after adjusting for inflation.

California’s subsidized child care and development system keeps families working while providing kids with an environment that helps them learn and thrive. Yet, we know that the number of children eligible for subsidized care far outstrips the number of available slots.[4] As the new Governor crafts a policy agenda for the next four years, it is critical that early care and education is at the top of the list. Investing in our state’s subsidized child care and development system sets children and families up for success.


[1] The federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 included a $2 billion boost in funding for the Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG), a major source of federal funding for subsidized child care. Due to this, California received $221 million in additional federal funds, which the state used in 2009-10 and 2010-11 to offset a portion of the state budget cuts to the child care and development system, which in turn maintained child care assistance for some families who otherwise would have lost it.

[2] Absent ongoing funding from the federal government, these slots will only be available through June 30, 2020.

[3] The 2014 reauthorization of the CCDBG, a major source of federal funding for subsidized child care, required states to increase the share of funds set aside for improving the quality of subsidized child care. See Hannah Matthews, et al., Implementing the Child Care and Development Block Grant Reauthorization: A Guide for States (The Center for Law and Social Policy and The National Women’s Law Center: June 2017).

[4] Kristin Schumacher, Over 1.2 Million California Children Eligible for Subsidized Child Care Did Not Receive Services From State Programs in 2015 (California Budget & Policy Center: December 2016).

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

 

Many women across California face significant barriers to advancing economically and achieving financial security. As part of the California Budget & Policy Center’s Policy Perspectives Speakers Series we discussed these barriers during our webinar: The California Women’s Well-Being Index: Advancing Gender Justice Through Increased Employment, Earnings, and Economic Security. 

View slide deck presented during the webinar.

Click on the image below to view the webinar recording:

Speakers included:

  • Chris Hoene, Executive Director, California Budget & Policy Center
  • Surina Khan, President and CEO, the Women’s Foundation of California
  • Kari Decker, Managing Director Corporate Responsibility, West Region, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
  • Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson, Chair, Select Committee on Women, Work, and Families
  • Kristin Schumacher, Senior Policy Analyst, California Budget & Policy Center
  • Noreen Farrell, Executive Director, Equal Rights Advocates
  • Danielle Beavers, Diversity and Inclusion Director, Greenlining Institute, and Women’s Policy Institute Fellow, Class of 2017-18
  • Kellie Todd Griffin, President of Sistallect, Inc., and founder of The State of Black Women in California Initiative

Building on our work with the Women’s Foundation of California on the California Women’s Well-Being Index, Budget Center Senior Policy Analyst Kristin Schumacher took a deeper look at the barriers women face on two particular dimensions of the Index: Employment & Earnings, and Economic Security.

A number of interconnected factors, such as gender- and race-based discrimination and weak public systems and supports, have resulted in women facing far greater economic hardship than men. In fact, at all stages of life women are more likely than men to live in poverty. With a focus on gender justice and racial equity, we released a set of briefs covering the key areas of Work Supports, Boosting IncomeBuilding Wealth, and the Safety Net.

During this webinar, we examined these focus areas and discuss actions that policymakers and other key decision makers can take to ensure California is a place where all women and their families can thrive.

This webinar was made possible with support by:

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!