Skip to content

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

There is increasing recognition in California and nationally that the financial aid students receive to attend college should address the cost of attendance beyond tuition and fees, since living expenses – particularly housing expenses – often make up the largest share of students’ budgets. Consequently, recent financial aid reform efforts at the state and federal levels have focused on aligning the structure of financial aid with the total cost of attendance. Cost of attendance estimates are determined by individual higher education institutions and are used by state and federal financial aid departments to calculate students’ financial aid award amounts. Currently, there is no standardized methodology for how colleges calculate off-campus housing cost of attendance estimates, which can create inaccurate and incomparable estimates across colleges. Bringing consistency and uniformity to how the cost of college is reported across institutions will better support students in their college investment decisions and create a standardized process by which financial aid eligibility is calculated. This Issue Brief compares three potential options for calculating off-campus housing costs and the benefits and limitations of each, and outlines approaches state policymakers could take to ensure cost estimates are standardized at higher education institutions across California.

See the print-friendly table to learn:

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Nearly 2.6 million California K-12 public school students (41.8%) bring a linguistic asset with them to school every day: living in homes where a language other than English is spoken. A majority of these students (1.4 million) demonstrate English proficiency during their school years. But students’ home language skills are often neglected at school and that means many do not receive the state biliteracy designation on their high school diplomas that could benefit students as they apply for higher education and employment opportunities. California can change this trend of overlooking the language assets of its K-12 students by increasing its supply of adequately trained bilingual education teachers who can help students become biliterate. Increasing the number of bilingual education teachers in California’s classrooms would help improve students’ futures and play an important role in meeting the demand for bilingual workers and boosting the state’s competitiveness in an increasingly globalized economy.

While California has taken some important steps in recent years to help bilingual students achieve biliteracy, the state faces significant challenges in meeting the need for adequately trained bilingual education teachers who can support these students. Voters ended restrictions to bilingual programs by approving Proposition 58 in November 2016. The following year the State Board of Education adopted the California English Learner Roadmap and the Legislature established the Bilingual Teacher Professional Development Program. In that time, the demand for bilingual education teachers has grown — as it has every year since 2012-13 when school districts estimated hiring close to 220 bilingual education teachers. By 2017-18, that number had increased by nearly 250%, to an estimate of roughly 760.

The shortage of adequately trained bilingual education teachers adds to the challenge of increasing demand.1 One way to assess that shortage is to look at the number of teachers who have been authorized to teach bilingually in recent years, which pales in comparison to the number of K-12 students who live in homes where languages other than English are spoken. Specifically, a large imbalance exists between 1) the number of students who live in homes where one of the top 10 languages is spoken and 2) teachers who earned an authorization to teach in those languages from 2008-09 to 2017-18 (See Table). For example, while Spanish-speaking teachers earned the largest share of bilingual authorizations during this period, the number of students who lived in Spanish-speaking homes in 2017-18 was substantially higher, resulting in a ratio of more than 250-to-1. The ratio for most other languages was even more imbalanced: more than 2,000-to-1 for students from Vietnamese-speaking homes, nearly 3,200-to-1 for Filipino-speaking homes, and more than 6,800-to-1 for Arabic-speaking homes.

The bilingual education teacher shortage is a significant obstacle preventing California students from achieving biliteracy. To address this shortage, policymakers can take additional steps to encourage people to become bilingual education teachers, support and retain them, and diversify the languages that those educators are prepared to teach. For example, the Legislature should extend and increase the modest $5 million provided for the Bilingual Teacher Professional Development Program, funding that will run out in 2020. Policymakers should also create systems to track and report students who receive the State Seal of Biliteracy and use this information to recruit, and diversify the languages of, bilingual education teachers, incentivize and prioritize career and technical education funding that creates pathways for bilingual educators, and increase the number of universities offering programs that authorize bilingual education teachers.

The language assets of California’s K-12 students present key opportunities. Increasing the supply of adequately trained bilingual education teachers is necessary to leverage those opportunities so more students can achieve biliteracy and the state can meet the demands of an increasingly globalized economy.


Support for the California Budget & Policy Center’s research and analysis of K-12 education issues is provided by the Sobrato Family Foundation and the Stuart Foundation.

1For a discussion of the shortage of bilingual teachers see the 2017 survey conducted by Californians Together.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

This 1-hour webinar was hosted by the California Budget & Policy Center, topics covered include:

  • Explain why the state budget matters for California’s K-12 schools
  • Increase understanding of the state budget process
  • Review the key players in the budget process, along with the timeline
  • Provide information to improve community engagement in the state budget process
  • Discuss a case study: Bilingual Teacher Professional Development Program

Speakers included:

  • Martha Zaragoza Diaz, Lobbyist, Zaragoza Diaz & Associates
  • Lizzette Barrios-Gracian, Teacher, Anaheim High School
  • Jonathan Kaplan, Senior Policy Analyst, California Budget & Policy Center

 

Download the slide deck to this presentation

 

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

California has a key advantage in meeting the increasing demand for a multi-lingual workforce: nearly 2.6 million K-12 public school students who live in homes where a language other than English is spoken. A majority of these students (1.4 million) have demonstrated English proficiency either when they started school or after being categorized as English learners. However, only a small share of these students have been able to demonstrate literacy in their home language — a sign that policymakers and education leaders are missing a key opportunity to leverage the language assets of the state’s students. Increasing the number of bilingual students who achieve biliteracy is a worthwhile goal that can improve their life outcomes and the state’s competitiveness in an increasingly globalized economy.

To encourage biliteracy and recognize students’ language skills, California established the State Seal of Biliteracy program in 2012. Any school district, county office of education, or charter school can offer the Seal of Biliteracy to high school graduates who achieve a high level of literacy and fluency in English and at least one other language. The State Seal of Biliteracy is free, voluntary, and schools can adopt it using an easy on-line form. However, while a majority of California school districts that issue high school diplomas offered the Seal of Biliteracy to their students in 2018-19, more than 3 in 10 (31.8%) did not.

Relatively few California students who live in homes where a language other than English is spoken receive the Seal of Biliteracy, despite the language assets they bring to the state’s classrooms. Any student who does not become biliterate represents a missed opportunity. But, this is especially true for students who live in homes where a language other than English is spoken and are also proficient in English: Five in six — more than 146,000 — of these “qualified” 12th grade students did not receive the Seal of Biliteracy in 2017-18.

Why aren’t more students receiving Seals of Biliteracy? One reason may be that the State Seal of Biliteracy has not been adopted by their schools. The remedy for this problem is easy: All school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools that award high school diplomas should adopt the Seal and offer it to their graduates. Other causes may be more challenging to address. For example, California lacks the number of adequately trained bilingual educators needed to deliver instruction in the home languages of the state’s large number of bilingual students, especially given the diversity of those languages.1 Ironically, the state could help meet its bilingual teacher shortage if even a small fraction of bilingual students who receive the Seal of Biliteracy became bilingual educators. The Seal is an important step toward identifying these students. But if California wants to employ bilingual students to address the state’s bilingual teacher shortage it will need to do a better job tracking those who receive the Seal of Biliteracy and providing them the support they need to become teachers. California’s State Seal of Biliteracy can encourage bilingual students to become biliterate, but unless schools adopt the program students will not be able to demonstrate biliteracy. Even if schools adopt the State Seal of Biliteracy, until they have qualified bilingual educators many students who are bilingual will not be able to achieve biliteracy.

Policymakers and education leaders can take key next steps in promoting California’s bilingual opportunities, including encouraging schools to adopt the Seal of Biliteracy, setting up tracking of students who receive Seal designations on their diplomas, and using this collective information to recruit and support qualified bilingual educators. This can all help leverage the language assets of the state’s large number of bilingual students to assist more Californians to become biliterate and strengthen our state’s workforce.


Support for the California Budget & Policy Center’s research and analysis of K-12 education issues is provided by the Sobrato Family Foundation and the Stuart Foundation.

1 Not graduating from high school is another reason students may not receive the Seal of Biliteracy.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Every day, millions of California students come to school with an invaluable asset: living in homes where a language other than English is spoken. However, this asset is often squandered as many of these students do not become literate in their home language. Achieving biliteracy benefits the students who are proficient in more than one language, the schools and colleges they attend, and the communities where these bilingual Californians live and eventually work. A large body of research, including studies cited in last year’s Getting Down to Facts II report, shows that “bilingual education, on average, benefits English Learner (EL) students, resulting in improved outcomes in English proficiency, target language proficiency, reclassification, academic performance, and social outcomes.” The report also cited research that points to the “important economic, cognitive, and cross-cultural benefits” of bilingualism, including the economic demand for bilingual workers. California has an opportunity to meet this demand given its large number of students who speak a language other than English at home. The question is whether the state can leverage that opportunity to improve the lives of these students, and also the state’s competitiveness in an increasingly globalized economy.

California’s K-12 schools educate a large number of students who live in a home where a language other than English is spoken. The state labels these students by three categories early in their education:

  1. English learner ⁠— students who have yet to demonstrate English proficiency;
  2. Reclassified fluent English proficient ⁠— students who previously were English learners and have been reclassified; and
  3. Initial fluent English proficient ⁠— students who demonstrate English proficiency when they enter school.

Grouped together, this universe of students is nearly 2.6 million in California’s public schools (41.8% of K-12 public school enrollment). By the state’s categories it’s: 1.2 million students who are classified as English learners (19.3%), 1.1 million students reclassified fluent English proficient (18.3%), and 261,000 students classified as initial fluent English proficient. (4.2%).

Few question the need for all California students to become literate in English and the 1.1 million English learners who have been reclassified as fluent English proficient signal progress toward that goal. However, labeling these students based on their English proficiency indicates their home language may be seen as a challenge to overcome rather than an asset. This may help explain why many of the state’s students who live in a home where a language other than English is spoken often are not provided the education required to achieve literacy in their family language. While students who speak more than one language are bilingual, they are not biliterate if they can’t read and write in more than one language. Until California prioritizes quality bilingual education for these students, the state will continue to miss opportunities to help Californians achieve biliteracy and leverage their language assets in our schools and workplaces.

California has taken some important steps in recent years to help bilingual students achieve biliteracy. Voters approved Proposition 58 in November 2016, which ended restrictions to bilingual programs that had been in place for nearly two decades and hindered students’ ability to become biliterate. The following year, the State Board of Education adopted the California English Learner Roadmap that intends to strengthen policies, programs, and practices for students classified as English learners. One key principle of the Roadmap includes building the capacity of educators to leverage the strengths and meet the needs of these students. Paradoxically, a key obstacle to leveraging the language assets of California’s students is a shortage of bilingual educators. A 2017 survey  conducted by Californians Together indicated a majority of K-12 districts (58%) planned to expand their bilingual programs. However, a large share of these districts (86%) said that their supply of bilingual teachers was insufficient to meet the staffing needs of those planned expansions.

Policymakers should look to students who speak languages other than English as an opportunity to help more Californians become biliterate, prepare for the workforce, and improve the state’s competitiveness in an increasingly globalized economy. With quality educational programs and adequate support, students who speak languages other than English can achieve biliteracy and improve knowledge and expertise in our workplaces and communities.


Support for the California Budget & Policy Center’s research and analysis of K-12 education issues is provided by the Sobrato Family Foundation and the Stuart Foundation.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!