California’s aid to low-income seniors and people with disabilities cannot compete with the high cost of housing. The Supplemental Security Income/State Supplementary Payment (SSI/SSP) grants help over 1 million low-income older adults and people with disabilities pay for housing and other necessities. However, the current individual grant of $1,183 is less than the Fair Market Rent (FMR) for a studio apartment in 25 counties.
Cuts during the Great Recession still impact the SSI/SSP program today. During this period, the state repealed the Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) for the SSP grant. Had the COLA been protected, the SSP grant would be almost double what it is today.
Boosting the SSI/SSP grant levels is essential to helping low-income Californians make ends meet. Along with protecting recent improvements, state leaders can take further action by increasing the maximum grant for individuals and restoring the annual state COLA.
There was a problem processing your signup. Please try again. Or contact us
Please check your email to confirm your signup.
key takeaway
Despite recent strides in increasing CalWORKs grants, persistent challenges remain in addressing deep poverty for California families. By advancing reforms, state leaders can lift families out of poverty and ensure economic security for Californians.
The California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program plays a crucial role in supporting children and families with low incomes. CalWORKs not only aids families financially, by providing modest monthly cash grants to over 650,000 children across the state, but also assists parents in overcoming employment barriers.1Based on Budget Center analysis of Department of Social Services data for September 2022, the most recent month with available statewide data. Although recent increases in CalWORKs grants have helped prevent deep poverty for many families, there is still work to do to ensure the prosperity of all CalWORKs families.
The Impact of Deep Poverty on California’s Children
Deep poverty — which occurs when a family’s income falls below half the official federal poverty line (FPL) — takes a toll on both children and the state. This hinders the development of a healthy society and economy. In 2022, approximately 6.6% of children in California were living in deep poverty.2Based on Budget Center analysis of US Census Bureau, American Community Survey data for 2022. Children experiencing poverty are more likely to face poverty in adulthood, impacting their overall well-being. When family incomes fall short of meeting basic needs, children may struggle to concentrate in school, face increased health risks in crowded living conditions, and endure heightened stress levels, negatively affecting their immune system and neurological development.3Mercedes Ekono, Yang Jiang, Sheila Smith, Young Children in Deep Poverty (National Center for Children in Poverty, January 2016). Allowing poverty to persist jeopardizes the prosperity of the entire state.
CalWORKs Advances: A Closer Look at Recent Progress
Despite facing cuts during and after the Great Recession, such as reduced grant levels and the elimination of the annual state cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), CalWORKs has seen positive developments in recent years. The 2022-2023 state budget marked a significant milestone with an effective 21% increase in CalWORKs grants — the largest since the program began in 1998. The 2023-2024 budget continued this trend with a 3.6% increase. For CalWORKs families, these advancements represent crucial steps toward eliminating deep poverty.
However, some CalWORKs families still receive grants below the deep poverty line. CalWORKs grants are adjusted according to the number of people in the household who are eligible for cash assistance. However, family members may be excluded from grant calculations if they:
have exceeded the time limit for assistance
are sanctioned for not meeting work requirements
are ineligible due to their immigration status
About 37% of CalWORKs families only receive aid for the children in the household, excluding the parents.4Based on Budget Center analysis of Department of Social Services data for September 2022, the most recent month with available statewide data. This amounts to 240,000 children in households that are not guaranteed a grant above the deep poverty threshold. This is only a baseline scenario, as some families may have one excluded parent while the other receives aid. Families of three with one excluded family member receive a maximum monthly grant that is as low as 42.5% of the FPL. This leaves them without sufficient assistance for basic needs.
Enhancing CalWORKs to Lift Families Out of Poverty
State leaders can help California families avoid deep poverty by increasing CalWORKS grants for families with excluded family members, similar to those not facing such exclusions. Simultaneously, leaders can strive to reduce the number of families that face exclusions by reforming CalWORKs sanctions. State leaders can ensure that no family in the CalWORKs program lives in deep poverty by:
Eliminating non-federally required sanctions.
Reducing the length of time parents are excluded from aid.
There was a problem processing your signup. Please try again. Or contact us
Please check your email to confirm your signup.
key takeaway
Federal government shutdowns can significantly disrupt California’s essential safety net programs, potentially affecting millions of residents and underscoring the importance of ongoing support for these vital services.
Access to health care, affordable food, safe housing, and a safety net to turn to during unexpected challenges is essential for everyone. Safety net programs provide critical support to more than 1 in 3 Californians every year. Without these important public supports, California’s poverty rate would be much higher.
During a federal government shutdown, safety net programs that receive federal funding can be affected, potentially causing disruptions to the lives of millions of Californians. This Q&A provides an overview of California’s safety net programs and how they can be impacted during a federal government shutdown.
What Are Safety Net Programs and How Many Californians Do They Support?
Safety net programs provide financial assistance, health care, and other essential services to millions of Californians. These programs help people with low-incomes or people experiencing unexpected challenges — such as losing a job — receive the care and support they need to get by. California safety net programs are supported by state and federal funding.
Why Does a Federal Government Shutdown Happen?
A federal government shutdown occurs when the United States Congress fails to pass annual or temporary spending bills before the start of the new federal fiscal year, which begins on October 1st. Federal policymakers can enact temporary spending bills, or continuing resolutions, that allow the government to continue operating while policymakers reach an agreement on the federal budget. Shutdowns typically happen due to political disputes, disagreements over spending priorities, and legislative gridlock.
How Can a Federal Government Shutdown Impact Safety Net Programs?
The duration of a federal government shutdown would determine the impact on safety net programs. Prolonged shutdowns can have devastating consequences for Californians who receive health, food, and housing assistance. If a shutdown persists, California policymakers should allocate additional state funds to sustain critical programs and services.
In contrast, shorter federal government shutdowns, lasting only a few days, generally cause less disruptions. Californians can still access various health and safety net supports during these brief closures. For instance, Californians who rely on Medi-Cal can maintain access to health care services, as Medi-Cal providers could continue to receive reimbursement in the short term. This is partly due to advance funding provisions within the Medicaid program, which can be secured in prior federal budgets.
What Are the Potential Impacts of a Brief Government Shutdown?
Community health centers, including Federally Qualified Health Centers, are more susceptible to adverse impacts. Even a brief shutdown would affect community health centers’ ability to provide services and meet operating expenses because they rely on funding from federal grants.
Short shutdowns can also have repercussions for other safety net programs. Some government employees would be furloughed during shutdowns, which means programs could experience staffing shortages. Staffing shortages could negatively impact Californians. For example, even though Californians could continue to receive rental assistance through HUD (Housing and Urban Development), nearly all of HUD’s fair housing activities would cease due to a reduced staffing.
What’s At Stake?
A prolonged federal shutdown could have disastrous effects on our state and disrupt the lives of millions of Californians, especially communities of color. Past and current racist wage and employment policies concentrate people of color into under-valued occupations with lower wages and minimal benefits. As a result, Black, Latinx, and other Californians of color are more likely to have trouble affording basic needs — like housing, groceries, and diapers — and are also more likely to qualify for safety net programs. If a prolonged shutdown leads to a suspension or reduction of critical programs and services, it would disrupt the lives of millions of Californians and exacerbate economic inequality. This underscores the need to ensure that every Californian, regardless of their race, age, zip code, or gender, can thrive and share in the state's prosperity.
There was a problem processing your signup. Please try again. Or contact us
Please check your email to confirm your signup.
key takeaway
California’s uninsured rate reached an all-time low in 2022, but the state must now work to maintain this progress. State leaders must ensure equitable access to health coverage as they process Medi-Cal renewals, which were temporarily suspended during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Consistent access to health care is necessary for everyone to be healthy and thrive. During the pandemic, millions of Californians with low incomes were able to stay continuously enrolled in Medi-Cal (California’s state Medicaid program) due to a federal pandemic-era policy.1A provision in the federal Families First Coronavirus Response Act passed in March 2020 required states to provide continuous coverage for Medicaid beneficiaries in exchange for enhanced federal funding during the federally declared Public Health Emergency (PHE). The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, which federal policymakers passed in December 2022, delinked the continuous coverage provision from the PHE, thereby ending this provision on March 31, 2023. Partly as a result of this federal policy, Medi-Cal enrollment in California reached an all-time high — with over 15 million people enrolled — while the uninsured rate dropped to a historic low (6.5%).
Earlier this year, California began processing Medi-Cal renewals for the first time since the start of the pandemic. Recent data reveal an alarming trend: More than 500,000 Californians have lost Medi-Cal coverage during recent months. Although not everyone who loses Medi-Cal coverage becomes uninsured, the majority of people who lost coverage did so because of paperwork challenges. Certain groups, including immigrants, older adults, and people with disabilities, are at greater risk of losing Medi-Cal coverage during this continuous coverage “unwinding” period.
State leaders have implemented measures to reduce barriers to accessing and maintaining Medi-Cal coverage. Still, policymakers can take additional steps to prevent Californians who remain eligible for Medi-Cal from losing coverage. This includes pausing procedural terminations and investing in health navigators. By taking additional action, state leaders can strive to ensure that all Californians, regardless of race, age, disability, or immigration status, can access and maintain the critical health coverage they need to be healthy and thrive.
What is health equity?
When everyone has the opportunity to be as healthy as possible and no one is disadvantaged from achieving this because of their race, gender identity, sexual orientation, the neighborhood they live in, or any other socially defined circumstance.
California’s Health Coverage Landscape: Progress, Disparities, and the Path to Equitable Coverage
California has made significant strides in expanding access to health coverage. This progress is primarily due to the federal Affordable Care Act (ACA) and, more recently, the state’s efforts to expand comprehensive Medi-Cal coverage to income-eligible undocumented Californians. The percentage of Californians without health coverage decreased to 6.5% in 2022, down from the previous record low of 7% in 2021. These recent improvements in health coverage highlight the significant progress that California has made over the last decade when the uninsured rate was over 17%.
While access to health coverage has improved for all racial/ethnic groups in California over the last decade, racial disparities in coverage persist. Notably, gains in health coverage were significantly lower for Californians who identified as American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN), who had the highest uninsured rate. The uninsured rate of AI/AN Californians was nearly double that of the overall Californian population. Racial disparities were also evident for Latinx Californians, who had the second-highest uninsured rate. This is particularly concerning given that people identifying as Latinx account for over 40% of the state’s population.
The racial disparities in health coverage highlight the profound and enduring impact of racism, which blocks Californians of color from equal access to health care. For example, some people of color may hesitate to seek coverage because they distrust the government and health care systems that are responsible for past and ongoing mistreatment against them, their families, and their communities. Another instance of a racist policy is the exclusion of undocumented immigrants, driven by racial and xenophobic biases, from enrolling in federally funded Medicaid coverage or purchasing coverage through the ACA marketplaces.2Undocumented immigrants are not eligible to enroll in federally funded Medicaid coverage or purchase coverage through the ACA Marketplaces. In recent years, California has allocated state funding to expand eligibility for full-scope Medi-Cal to undocumented immigrants.
While California has made significant progress in increasing health coverage, there is much more work to be done to ensure equitable access to health coverage for all Californians. Addressing the racial disparities in health coverage requires targeted outreach and education efforts along with other antiracist policy actions to improve health and well-being for Californians of color.
Many Californians Are Losing Medi-Cal Coverage Due to Paperwork Challenges
On April 1, 2023, California began the process of redetermining eligibility for Medi-Cal enrollees for the first time since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) publishes data showing the number of Californians who become disenrolled as a result of the redetermination process (i.e., undergo a procedural termination).3The California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) publishes interactive Medi-Cal dashboards detailing statewide and county-level demographic data on Medi-Cal application processing, enrollments, redeterminations, and renewal outcomes. DHCS also provides valuable insight into the circumstances leading to the disenrollment of Medi-Cal beneficiaries, which are categorized as follows:
Procedural: an individual loses coverage due to issues with their renewal paperwork.4In this issue brief, the term "paperwork" is used in place of the term "procedural." This may be a result of a Medi-Cal enrollee not receiving or returning requested forms on time, or other issues with the application system.
Over Income: an individual's income exceeds the Medi-Cal eligibility threshold, potentially making them eligible for coverage through Covered California — the state’s health insurance marketplace.
Other Reasons: an individual moves out of the state, voluntarily disenrolls, or passes away.
Nearly 9 in 10 Californians (89.2%) who lost Medi-Cal coverage in August 2023 did so because they did not complete the renewal paperwork or had incorrect or missing information in their forms. Although not everyone who loses Medi-Cal coverage becomes uninsured, the data reveal a troubling trend.5Medi-Cal members have 90 days after their disenrollment to provide the necessary outstanding information to their local Medi-Cal office to restore their coverage. After the 90 days, people can submit a new application. Historically, California has seen a reinstatement rate of about 4% over the 90-day period.
Completing the renewal process often involves complex paperwork and documentation requirements, which can be difficult to navigate. Additionally, some Californians have experienced extended call wait times when attempting to contact county Medi-Cal workers regarding their application.
Certain groups, including older adults and people with disabilities, are at greater risk of losing Medi-Cal coverage during the unwinding period.6Jennifer Tolbert and Meghana Ammula, 10 Things to Know About the Unwinding of the Medicaid Continuous Enrollment Provision (Kaiser Family Foundation, June 2023). Immigrants and their family members face unique obstacles to remaining covered, such as language barriers, privacy concerns, and fear of immigration consequences. As such, many Californians who are losing Medi-Cal coverage due to paperwork challenges may still meet the eligibility criteria.7Of the redeterminations that were received and processed in August 2023, about 20% were ineligible. See California Department of Health Care Services, Medi-Cal Continuous Coverage Unwinding Dashboard (August 2023), 14.
The high disenrollment rate due to paperwork challenges underscores the need to further streamline the renewal process and alleviate the paperwork burden on beneficiaries during the unwinding period and beyond. Addressing these challenges is essential to ensure that those who are eligible for Medi-Cal continue to receive vital health coverage.
Policy Recommendations to Support Equitable Access to Health Coverage Amidst the Unwinding Period
State leaders have taken steps to mitigate the impact of the continuous coverage unwinding period and better support access to health coverage. Earlier this year, the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) set forth a detailed plan with a guiding principle to maximize the continuity of coverage for Medi-Cal beneficiaries. These actions include:
Providing one-time funding support to local county offices, which are responsible for determining the initial and continuing Medi-Cal eligibility for an individual or a family.
Authorizing Covered California to enroll individuals in a qualified health plan when they lose Medi-Cal coverage.
Engaging community partners to serve as “Coverage Ambassadors” to share information with Medi-Cal beneficiaries about how to maintain Medi-Cal coverage.
State leaders can build on previous policy changes by taking action on the following recommendations:
Encouraging DHCS to suspend procedural Medi-Cal terminations given the high rate of such termination
This could help toprevent undue disruptions in health coverage. Additionally, the state can identify the reasons why these disenrollments are occurring and develop strategies to remedy this.
Recommending DHCS to increase the rate of ex parte renewals
Expanding investments in health navigators to ensure that Californians who are eligible for Medi-Cal do not lose coverage
Health navigators are trusted members of a community who play an important role in making sure that people who are eligible for Medi-Cal can access coverage. They help to inform community members about health coverage programs and services in a way that is linguistically and culturally responsive to the communities they serve.
Accelerating the implementation of continuous Medi-Cal coverage for children from birth to age 5
In 2022, policymakers passed legislation that would allow children enrolled in Medi-Cal to remain enrolled without administrative renewals. However, this policy is not slated to begin until January 2025.
Submitting a waiver to provide adults 12 months of continuous coverage
Several other states have done so. Extending continuous coverage for adults would promote consistent health care access, reduce administrative burdens, and increase economic stability for Californians.
By taking these steps, state leaders can work towards ensuring that all eligible individuals, regardless of age, disability, or immigration status, can access and maintain the critical health coverage they need in order to be healthy and thrive.
A provision in the federal Families First Coronavirus Response Act passed in March 2020 required states to provide continuous coverage for Medicaid beneficiaries in exchange for enhanced federal funding during the federally declared Public Health Emergency (PHE). The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, which federal policymakers passed in December 2022, delinked the continuous coverage provision from the PHE, thereby ending this provision on March 31, 2023.
The California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) publishes interactive Medi-Cal dashboards detailing statewide and county-level demographic data on Medi-Cal application processing, enrollments, redeterminations, and renewal outcomes.
4
In this issue brief, the term "paperwork" is used in place of the term "procedural."
5
Medi-Cal members have 90 days after their disenrollment to provide the necessary outstanding information to their local Medi-Cal office to restore their coverage. After the 90 days, people can submit a new application. Historically, California has seen a reinstatement rate of about 4% over the 90-day period.
Of the redeterminations that were received and processed in August 2023, about 20% were ineligible. See California Department of Health Care Services, Medi-Cal Continuous Coverage Unwinding Dashboard (August 2023), 14.
You may also be interested in the following resources:
There was a problem processing your signup. Please try again. Or contact us
Please check your email to confirm your signup.
About this event
Making sure every Californian has access to quality health care should be a top priority for policymakers. Despite significant progress toward universal coverage over the last decade, we know that racial disparities in coverage persist. In addition, many Californians are losing access to health care, including our state’s Medi-Cal system.
We’ll explore the recent downward trend in Medi-Cal coverage and learn what state leaders can do to ensure that all Californians can access and maintain the health coverage they need in order to be healthy and thrive.
You’ll hear from a panel featuring a researcher, an advocate, a community health worker, and a state official, each offering their unique perspective on efforts to expand health care coverage and build a robust health workforce that reflects communities throughout California.
Maria Lemus, Executive Director, Vision y Compromiso
Celia Valdez, Director of Health Coverage, Maternal and Child Health Access
Elizabeth Landsberg, Director, California Department of Healthcare Access and Information
Thank you to our event sponsors
Blue Shield of California Foundation, Heising Simons Foundation, James Irvine Foundation, Hilton Foundation
About the California Budget & Policy Center
The California Budget & Policy Center is a research and analysis nonprofit advancing public policies that expand opportunities and promote well-being for all Californians.
Over 50% of Eligible College Students Don’t Participate in SNAP
While there are safety net programs in place, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) — or CalFresh, as it is known in California — to help people put food on the table, people who are enrolled in college at least half-time face significantly more complex rules to qualify.
A recent government report estimated that over 50% of eligible students did not participate in SNAP. The report pointed to the complexity of student-specific eligibility rules as a likely contributor to low enrollment rates. To qualify, students enrolled at least half-time must meet the regular income eligibility criteria and also meet one of eight additional requirements.1Under SNAP/CalFresh, people are considered students if they are enrolled in an institution of higher education at least half-time, are between the ages of 18 and 49, and are deemed mentally and physically fit. Students who are enrolled less than half-time are not classified as “students” under CalFresh. These students only have to meet the regular income eligibility criteria to receive benefits. Four of these requirements are geared toward parents or caretakers. The other four require that students:
Be in their final semester.
Work at least 20 hours a week.
Participate in work study, or enroll in an employment training program.
If they do not meet these requirements, they cannot receive CalFresh regardless of their income or needs.
CalFresh Requirements Need to Be Simplified for College Students
Given the increasingly high costs of attending college, students with low incomes face a significant disadvantage and a higher likelihood of experiencing food insecurity. In fact, within the California Community Colleges (CCC) system, which serves high percentages of people of color and people with low incomes, over half of all students are enrolled at least half-time. Therefore, these students would need to meet the burdensome requirements to access CalFresh. Nearly three-quarters of these students are under the age of 25, which makes them less likely to meet requirements geared toward parents and families. This suggests that most students in need of food assistance would have to take on jobs on top of their heavy course loads. This could significantly impact their ability to meet their educational goals.
Under federal COVID-19 relief policies, additional exemption criteria were granted to allow more students to receive CalFresh. The expansion allowed students eligible for federal or state work study, regardless of whether they participated, or those with $0 in expected family contributions to qualify for CalFresh if they met the regular income requirements. As a result, student applications for CalFresh more than quadrupled in 2021.2Aaron Kunst, Andrew Cheyne, Becky Silva, and Ruben E. Canedo, CalFresh for College Students: Equitable and Just Access (California Association of Food Banks, March 2022), 4, https://www.cafoodbanks.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/College-CalFresh-WhitePaper-final-March2022.pdf. However, these federal exemptions ended in June 2023. Students who qualified for CalFresh via these exemptions will no longer be eligible at their renewal date.
Policymakers Can Ensure College Students Have Better Access to Food Assistance
College students should have the same opportunity as any other Californian to access CalFresh. Policymakers have a responsibility to support college students in meeting their educational goals to ensure a skilled workforce in California.
Federal policymakers can help reduce student hunger by:
Reinstating COVID-19 expansions to SNAP.
Completely removing the additional red tape that students face to put students on equal footing with everyone else.
In the meantime, state policymakers can continue to support students by investing in administrative support and ensuring that the program is accessible to all eligible students.
Support for this report was provided by the Hilton Foundation.
Under SNAP/CalFresh, people are considered students if they are enrolled in an institution of higher education at least half-time, are between the ages of 18 and 49, and are deemed mentally and physically fit. Students who are enrolled less than half-time are not classified as “students” under CalFresh. These students only have to meet the regular income eligibility criteria to receive benefits.
There was a problem processing your signup. Please try again. Or contact us
Please check your email to confirm your signup.
key takeaway
State policymakers must continue to invest in the health workforce in order to meet the needs of Californians. This includes investments in community-led efforts to promote health, such as community health workers and promotores de salud.
Access to health care services is important for everyone’s health and well-being. The state’s workforce must meet the needs of Californians to achieve equitable access to timely and culturally competent health services. While state policymakers have made considerable investments in recent years to bolster the health workforce, investments in various health workforce areas still fall short.
Investments to Increase Provider Participation in Medi-Cal Are Critical
More than 15 million Californians with modest incomes — nearly half of whom are Latinx — receive free or low-cost health care through Medi-Cal (California’s Medicaid program). In order to better support the millions of Californians who rely on the state’s health safety net, policymakers have taken steps to increase provider participation in Medi-Cal.
Specifically, this year’s 2023-24 budget includes $237.4 million to increase Medi-Cal provider rates effective January 1, 2024. Rate increases are targeted to:
primary care, which includes nurse practitioners and physical assistants,
maternity care (i.e., obstetrics/gynecology physicians and doulas),
and non-specialty mental health services, such as for mental health evaluation and treatment.
The governor’s administration also plans for additional Medi-Cal provider rate increases in future years for hospital outpatient procedures and services, family planning services, emergency physician services, and more.
Policymakers Should Also Invest in Community-Led Efforts to Promote Health
California is home to people with diverse cultural and ethnic backgrounds. Therefore, policymakers should invest in workforce strategies that leverage community-led efforts to improve health. This includes investing in community health workers and promotores de salud, frontline public health workers who are trusted members of their communities. They serve as liaisons between the community and health and social service providers in order to facilitate access to services and improve service delivery. Community health workers and promotores provide services in a way that is linguistically and culturally responsive to the needs of the communities they serve.
State leaders have taken initial steps to integrate community health workers and promotores into the Medi-Cal workforce. For instance, state leaders established a community health worker benefit within the Medi-Cal program in July 2022. This allows these workers to be paid for providing services to Medi-Cal enrollees. These services include:
health education to help patients manage chronic health conditions,
and health navigation to assist people access health care services.
Additional ongoing investments are needed to develop a strong pipeline of community health workers and also to ensure that workers are paid fair wages.
State Policymakers Should Increase Health Workforce Opportunities for Youth
Youth and young adults have tremendous power to improve health outcomes within their communities — both in the immediate and long term. Examples of youth supporting youth are peer-to-peer programs in school settings and peer support specialists. Research shows that peer-to-peer supports help improve mental health outcomes, decrease substance use, and reduce hospital admission rates. Policymakers should invest in peer support programs that lead to meaningful career pathways for youth and young adults. Particularly, for individuals disconnected from school or employment.
Meeting the health needs of Californians will require significant long-term investment in youth workforce development programs. In 2019, the California Future Health Workforce Commission developed a strategic plan for addressing health workforce gaps. According to a recent progress report, policymakers have made progress on many of the priority recommendations. However, state leaders can do more to recruit and train students from rural areas and other historically underserved communities to practice in community health centers.
Bottom line: State policymakers must continue to build a health workforce that meets the needs of Californians. Policymakers should also invest in efforts to make sure that the health workforce better reflects the diversity of all Californians. This includes their race/ethnicity, disability status, gender identity, and sexual orientation. Doing so will require sustained, ongoing investment.
There was a problem processing your signup. Please try again. Or contact us
Please check your email to confirm your signup.
All Californians deserve to be able to care for themselves or their loved ones when they are ill. While California is set to become the world’s fourth-largest economy, the state lags behind when comparing paid sick leave laws across the US (see Table). As a result, many California workers face the impossible decision of going to work while sick or losing their paycheck.
In California, state law mandates that eligible workers can earn up to 24 hours of paid sick leave, depending on how many hours they work. Employers may provide workers with more paid sick time. However, workers with low wages — who are disproportionately women and people of color — are far less likely to have additional employer-provided time off. This means many workers have just three days of paid sick leave for an entire year.
How are workers left behind in California?
Left behind: A father works as a janitor and has a daughter who gets the flu. He needs to stay home and care for her. He has earned the maximum amount of paid sick leave mandated by his state, but his employer doesn’t provide any further leave.
In California, he uses up his 24 hours to care for his daughter because she needs to stay home from school for three days. He is now left with zero paid sick leave for the remainder of the year.
In Colorado, he has 48 hours of paid sick leave. He uses 24 of those hours to care for his daughter, and has 24 hours left for other illnesses that arise.
Left behind: A grocery store cashier tests positive for COVID-19. She needs to stay home for at least five days. While she worked enough hours to accumulate the maximum amount of leave provided by her state, her employer does not provide additional leave.
In California, she uses up her 24 hours in the first three days — leaving her with no sick leave for the rest of the year — and must stay home for two more days, unpaid. She wants to stay home for more than five days to fully recover, but that would mean going even longer without pay or working while sick.
In New Mexico, she has 64 hours of paid sick leave. She uses 40 hours for her isolation period, and still has 24 hours remaining to further recover.
COVID-19 demonstrated the critical importance of paid sick leave. Unfortunately, the supplemental paid sick leave put in place during the early days of the pandemic has expired. Workers need more paid time off when they or their family members are sick. It’s time for California to catch up to the states that are leading on this issue.
Paid Sick Leave Policies in Effect in the US, 2023
State
How Many Hours Employees Must Be Allowed to Earn*
Applies to Which Employers?
Washington
No cap: 1 hour earned for every 40 hours worked
All employers
New Mexico
64 hours
All employers
Colorado
48 hours
All employers
Minnesota**
48 hours
All employers
Vermont
40 hours
All employers
New Jersey
40 hours
All employers
New York
40 or 56 hours
Employers with < 100 workers (40 hours)***
Employers with 100+ workers (56 hours)
Oregon
40 hours
Employers with 10+ workers
Massachusetts
40 hours
Employers with 11+ workers
Arizona
24 or 40 hours
Employers with < 15 workers (24 hours)
Employers with 15+ workers (40 hours)
Maryland
40 hours
Employers with 15+ workers
Rhode Island
40 hours
Employers with 18+ workers
Connecticut
40 hours
Employers with 50+ workers
Michigan
40 hours
Employers with 50+ workers
Washington DC
3, 5, or 7 days
Employers with < 25 workers (3 days)
Employers with 25-99 workers (5 days)
Employers with 100+ workers (7 days)
California
24 hours
All employers
* Employers may choose to provide more paid sick leave than required by state law, but these laws establish a minimum requirement that workers can earn.
** This will go into effect on January 1, 2024.
*** For employers with 4 or fewer workers, the requirement to provide at least 40 hours of paid sick leave applies only if the employer’s annual net income exceeded $1 million in the previous tax year.
Source: Data from A Better Balance and Budget Center analysis of state paid sick leave laws
There was a problem processing your signup. Please try again. Or contact us
Please check your email to confirm your signup.
This website uses cookies to analyze site traffic and to allow users to complete forms on the site. The California Budget & Policy Center does not share, trade, sell, or otherwise disclose personal information. By using our website you agree to our Privacy Policy.
