Skip to content

Introduction

Governor Gavin Newsom released the May Revision to his proposed 2022-23 state budget on May 13, projecting $49 billion in discretionary revenues, a $227 billion General Fund spending plan, and total reserves of $37 billion. 

The state’s fiscal health presents state leaders with an opportunity to provide targeted relief to the Californians most harmed by rising costs of living and an ongoing pandemic. While the governor’s proposal makes some strides, it fails to adequately provide direct, meaningful assistance to individuals and families struggling the most to pay for basic needs. Specifically, the administration proposes to move forward with a proposal to provide rebates to households based on vehicle registration — knowing it will exclude many Californians who need help and include wealthy Californians who do not need the aid — that only reinforces California’s widening income and wealth gap.

Progress in the May Revision

The governor’s budget proposal would make progress by investing in:

  • Public health infrastructure at the local and state levels.
  • Comprehensive Medi-Cal for Californians with low incomes who are undocumented and ages 26-49.
  • Health premium subsidies for Californians with low and middle incomes.
  • Emergency rental assistance that state leaders agreed to earlier this year.
  • Homekey to support housing to help people exit homelessness.
  • Children’s behavioral health.
  • Pandemic protections for subsidized child care providers and families to boost economic security.
  • K-12 and higher education systems.

Missed Opportunities in the May Revision

In addition to the ill-advised vehicle-based rebates plan, the governor’s proposals fail to:

  • Expand or strengthen the California Earned Income Tax Credit (CalEITC) that provides direct cash assistance to Californians earning low wages.
  • Increase payment rates for California workers who need paid time off.
  • Adequately invest in long-term housing and supportive services to address homelessness.
  • Provide new investments in the development, acquisition, or preservation of affordable housing.
  • Provide more public health support to address health equity.
  • Increase payment rates for subsidized child care providers.
  • Increase CalWORKs grants at a level that keeps all families out of deep poverty.
  • Significantly invest in addressing the needs of older adults and people with disabilities.
  • Expand food assistance to all Californians who are undocumented.
  • Allocate large one-time discretionary grants in the K-12 and California Community College systems using equity-based formulas. 
  • Streamline and eliminate barriers that prevent students from low- and middle-income households and students of color from accessing state financial aid.

Tax Breaks for Wealthy Californians & Corporations

Too many of the governor’s proposals also potentially waste vital resources by providing  aid and tax breaks to wealthy Californians and corporations. Most notably, the administration proposes to spend $3 billion over the next two years to unnecessarily pay down a federal unemployment insurance loan, which amounts to a tax break that primarily benefits larger businesses and corporations. 

On the Gann Limit

The May Revision also outlines how the governor proposes to manage the state’s constitutional spending limit — or Gann Limit. The administration projects that the state will be under the limit for the two-year period ending on June 30, 2022 and will exceed the limit, pending other budget choices, in 2022-23. However, if state revenues continue to grow, state leaders may be confronted with making cuts to current services to meet the state’s rising constitutional spending obligations. As a result, the Gann Limit threatens to hold the state back from building a better and more equitable future for Californians and will need to be repealed or significantly reformed in future years.

Looking Ahead

This First Look report by the Budget Center team outlines key pieces of the May Revision to the governor’s 2022-23 budget proposal and examines how state leaders can expand upon the governor’s proposals to invest in the people who are most struggling to meet basic needs. Californians across the state have put their own health and well-being at risk to keep our communities running amid the ongoing pandemic, and the 2022-23 state budget agreed upon by the Legislature and governor should ensure kids, families, and individuals can be healthy and thrive.

what is the may revise?

Released on or before May 14, the May Revision (also known as the May Revise) updates the governor’s economic and revenue outlook; adjusts the governor’s proposed expenditures to reflect revised estimates and assumptions; revises, supplements, or withdraws policy initiatives that were included in the governor’s proposed budget in January; and outlines adjustments to the minimum funding guarantee for K-14 education required by Proposition 98 (1988).

Contents

Budget Overview

Health

Homelessness & Housing

Economic Security

Education

Justice Systems

Workforce & Other Proposals


Budget Overview

Revised Budget Projects Slightly Slower Economic Growth, Increase in Minimum Wage

The governor’s revised economic outlook expects US and California economic growth to continue in the coming years, but at a slower rate than projected in January. This reflects several factors including global supply chain bottlenecks, recent interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve, and persistently high inflation. The administration also expects steady job growth to continue, helping to draw more people back to the labor force and reducing the state’s unemployment rate to around 4% by the end of the year. In addition, the revised budget projects inflation to fall to around pre-pandemic rates by the end of 2023, which should contribute to real average wage gains in the coming years. The administration also projects that inflation will exceed 7% in 2021-22, which will trigger an automatic increase in the state’s minimum wage, bringing it up to $15.50 for all employers beginning January 1, 2023.

Revised Budget Reflects Even Stronger Revenues than Anticipated in January

The governor’s January budget projected state revenues to come in significantly higher than assumed in the 2021 enacted budget. Despite a less positive economic outlook than expected in January, the revenue outlook for the three-year budget window spanning 2020-21 through 2022-23 has continued to improve. The governor now estimates that General Fund revenues across the budget window will be $55 billion higher than estimated in the January proposal, before accounting for transfers such as to the state’s rainy day fund. 

The administration projects that total General Fund revenues before transfers will be $223 billion in the upcoming budget year — an increase of $25 billion over the January estimate. For the state’s three largest revenue sources, the revised budget projects 2022-23 General Fund revenues of:

  • $137 billion in personal income taxes,
  • $39 billion in corporation taxes, and
  • $34 billion in sales and use taxes.

Additionally, the administration now estimates that General Fund revenues for the current 2021-22 fiscal year will also total $223 billion — $29 billion higher than projected in the governor’s January proposal.

The estimated revenue growth over the three-year period reflects:

  • Increased personal income tax revenues due to strong wage growth and a booming stock market in 2021, prior to the 2022 market decline.
  • Increased corporation taxes due to higher corporate profits and more “pass-through” businesses choosing to participate in an elective tax payment program. The revenue from these elective payments will be largely offset through personal income tax credits for the owners and shareholders of these businesses.
  • Increased sales tax revenues due to inflation and some continuation of the trend of consumers spending more on taxable goods than on untaxed services during the pandemic.

The governor’s revised plan proposes several tax changes, including:

  • Modest improvements to the Young Child Tax Credit and a new tax credit for former foster youth, as proposed in January and covered in the CalEITC and Tax Credits section, at an estimated cost of $89 million in 2022-23.
  • A tax payment flexibility program proposed in January for low- and middle-income households, estimated to cost $100 million in the current year (2021-22) and $60 million in 2022-23.
  • A one-year suspension of the General Fund portion of the diesel sales tax (approximately 3.9%), estimated to cost $327 million in 2022-23 and $112 million in 2023-24. The governor proposes to use other General Fund revenues to backfill the lost revenues for transportation funding.
  • An extension of the California Competes tax credit program through 2027-28 at an annual cap of $180 million. This program awards tax credits to businesses that pledge to create jobs or make investments in the state and is currently set to expire after 2022-23. The governor also proposes $120 million to extend the California Competes grant program for one additional year. The grant program was created last year to provide awards to businesses that owe no taxes and do not benefit from tax credits. While California Competes is better structured than many other business tax incentives, the majority of these dollars go to large, profitable corporations.
  • An expansion of an existing sales tax exemption for business equipment purchases, focused on businesses that extract, process, or manufacture with lithium, at a cost of $15 million annually from 2022-23 through 2024-25. The governor also proposes an unspecified tax on lithium extraction.
  • A set of reforms to the state’s cannabis taxes, including the elimination of the tax on cannabis cultivation and mechanisms to ensure that cannabis tax-funded programs for youth, environmental restoration, and public safety continue to be funded at a baseline level of $670 million in each fiscal year through 2025-26. These mechanisms include providing up to $150 million one-time General Fund to backfill lost revenues as needed through 2025-26, and the option to increase the cannabis excise tax to make up the difference.

The revised budget also reflects tax changes proposed in January that have already been enacted through early action, including an early reversal of the temporary limitation on business tax credits and net operating losses as well as the exclusion of federal COVID-relief grants to restaurants and venue operators for state tax purposes. Finally, the revised budget now assumes that the two new business incentive programs the governor proposed in January to encourage climate change mitigation research and technologies will be administered as a grant program instead of tax credits.

Governor’s Car Rebate Proposal Steers Support in the Wrong Direction

The governor’s revised budget includes a proposal announced by the governor in March to provide rebates to car-owning Californians to address high gas prices. Under the proposal, Californians would be able to receive $400 each for up to two registered vehicles, at an estimated cost of $11.5 billion. This proposal appears to be one of the major ways the proposed budget would stay under the State Appropriations Limit (see the Gann Limit section). The governor indicated that the rebate would not be available for vehicles above a certain value, but did not specify what this value would be. Previous information released by the administration suggested that the rebates would be provided to eligible individuals by a third-party vendor based on information provided by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). 

This proposal falls short in several ways. Financial relief for Californians should be:

  • Targeted to Californians having the most difficulty making ends meet. Californians with low incomes and Black, Latinx, and other Californians of color are the most likely to be struggling to afford basic expenses. This reflects more than just gas prices. Low-income households have been hit hard by the rising costs of housing, food, and other necessities. And Californians in households without cars are more than twice as likely to be living in poverty. Additionally, some people with cars may not have valid registrations because they cannot afford to pay renewal fees or parking fines. Although the governor’s plan would provide needed assistance to non-vehicle owners by including $750 million for public transit agencies to provide free rides and by providing assistance with rent, utilities, health insurance, and child care costs, the scale of resources proposed for these purposes pales in comparison to the proposed payments for car owners. Policymakers should ensure that state resources are directed toward people that are in most need of help without providing windfalls to high-income and wealthy Californians who are not struggling to get by. 
  • Meaningful to those who receive it. Better targeting would also allow for the state to provide more meaningful relief that would go further in meeting the needs of the most financially strapped families and individuals.
  • Delivered through efficient and proven pathways. Last year, state leaders were able to provide direct assistance to Californians with low and middle incomes through two Golden State Stimulus packages for people who file taxes and Golden State Grants for people receiving CalWORKs and Supplemental Security Income. Instead of creating a new and untested system to deliver relief specifically for vehicle owners based on DMV records — which could take additional time and resources to ramp up — policymakers should build on proven mechanisms and identify options to provide aid to those left out of previous rounds of payments.

Unanticipated Growth in Revenues Allows State to Build Reserves to $37 Billion

California has a number of state reserve accounts, some of which are established in the state’s Constitution to require deposits and restrict withdrawals, and some of which are at the discretion of state policymakers.  

California voters approved Proposition 2 in November 2014, amending the California Constitution to revise the rules for the state’s Budget Stabilization Account (BSA), commonly referred to as the rainy day fund. Prop. 2 requires an annual set-aside equal to 1.5% of estimated General Fund revenues. An additional set-aside is required when capital gains revenues in a given year exceed 8% of General Fund tax revenues. For 15 years — from 2015-16 to 2029-30 — half of these funds must be deposited into the rainy day fund and the other half is to be used to reduce certain state liabilities (also known as “budgetary debt”).

Prop. 2 sets the maximum size of the BSA at 10% of General Fund Revenues and, if the limit is reached, any dollars that otherwise would have gone into the BSA would have to be spent on infrastructure, including spending related to deferred maintenance. 

Prop. 2 also established a new state budget reserve for K-12 schools and community colleges called the Public School System Stabilization Account (PSSSA). The PSSSA requires that when certain conditions are met, the state must deposit a portion of General Fund revenues into this reserve as part of California’s Prop. 98 funding guarantee (see Prop 98. section). 

The BSA is not California’s only reserve fund. Each year, the state deposits additional funds into a “Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties” (SFEU). Additionally, the 2018-19 budget agreement created the Safety Net Reserve Fund, which holds funds that can be used to maintain benefits and services for CalWORKs and Medi-Cal participants in the event of an economic downturn. 

Stronger-than-expected revenue collections result in changes to the BSA, PSSSA, and SFEU projections for 2022-23. The administration projects 2022-23 balances of:

  • $23.3 billion in the BSA;
  • $9.5 billion in the PSSSA; and
  • $3.4 billion in the SFEU.

The administration’s proposal for 2022-23 leaves the Safety Net Reserve at its 2021-22 level of $900 million.

The governor’s proposal estimates that the BSA is now at its constitutional maximum (10% of General Fund revenue), resulting in a required $476 million in infrastructure investments in 2022-23.

Taking into account the BSA, PSSSA, Safety Net Reserve, and SFEU, the governor’s proposal would build state reserves to a total of $37.1 billion in 2022-23.

State Is Under the Gann Limit Through 2021-22, but Exceeds the Cap in 2022-23

In 1979, California voters approved Proposition 4, a constitutional amendment to limit state and local spending that became known as the “Gann Limit” after its primary sponsor, Paul Gann. The Gann Limit restricts policymakers’ ability to use revenues that exceed the spending cap. At the state level, this cap is tied to California’s 1978-79 spending level and is adjusted each year for changes in population and per capita personal income, as explained in the Budget Center’s Gann Limit Q&A. The Gann Limit was not a factor in state budgeting for several decades but recently has emerged as a constraint because state revenues are “growing faster than the limit,” according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO).

If the state exceeds the Gann Limit over a two-year period, the Legislature must spend the revenue over the limit in specific ways — providing half to taxpayers and the other half to K-12 schools and community colleges. State policymakers have limited options to structure budgets to avoid exceeding the spending cap. For example, they can spend more on things that are excluded from the limit, such as tax refunds, emergency response, and infrastructure projects, which can include housing. Reducing tax revenues, such as by expanding tax credits like the CalEITC, also helps the state to avoid exceeding the Gann Limit.

The budget and policy choices reflected in the May Revision keep the state under the Gann Limit by $2.6 billion (on net) across 2020-21 and 2021-22, the current fiscal year. These choices include massive outlays in 2021-22 for infrastructure, emergency response, and the governor’s ill-advised cash rebates for vehicle owners — all of which are excluded from the Gann Limit. (See the “Rebates” section for more on the governor’s vehicle-based rebate proposal.) Specifically, the revised budget excludes:

  • $36.7 billion for infrastructure projects in 2021-22, up from $3.5 billion in 2020-21;
  • $13.4 billion to address the COVID-19 and drought emergencies in 2021-22, up from $2.1 billion in 2020-21; and
  • $11.5 billion in tax refunds for vehicle owners in 2021-22, up from $0 in 2020-21.

In contrast, the administration projects the state will exceed the Gann Limit by $3.4 billion in 2022-23, the fiscal year that begins on July 1. This occurs largely because the May Revision excludes much less spending from the Gann Limit in 2022-23 compared to 2021-22. For example, the revised budget excludes:

  • $15.7 billion for infrastructure projects in 2022-23, down from $36.7 billion in 2021-22;
  • $4.3 billion to address the COVID-19 and drought emergencies in 2022-23, down from $13.4 billion in 2021-22; and
  • $0 in tax refunds for vehicle owners in 2022-23, down from $11.5 billion in 2021-22.

Notably, only a small share of Gann-exempt infrastructure spending that the May Revision budgets for 2022-23 would go toward housing — a clear missed opportunity in light of the state’s housing affordability crisis. (See the Housing & Homelessness section.)

As the governor and legislative leaders work toward finalizing the 2022-23 budget package, they will be able to craft a spending plan that satisfies Gann Limit requirements while also continuing to support baseline public services and systems. This is because the state’s large budget “surplus” provides policymakers with room to maneuver this year. Policymakers can meet the state’s constitutional obligations — including the Gann Limit and the Proposition 98 school funding guarantee — while also maintaining and in some cases expanding state services overall.

However, the state is likely to face large and growing Gann Limit requirements in the next few years if revenues keep growing substantially. For example, the LAO estimates that under the governor’s revenue assumptions and spending proposals, the state would face Gann Limit obligations exceeding $20 billion in 2023-24. In addition, the state will continue to be required to spend part of each General Fund dollar to satisfy its other constitutional obligations, including Prop. 98 (funding for K-14 education) and Prop. 2 (reserve deposits and debt payments). Under this scenario, for every dollar in revenue that is subject to Gann Limit requirements, the state would have to spend more than a dollar to meet its constitutionally required obligations. To keep the budget in balance while also satisfying all of these obligations, state leaders would have to cut spending on services and systems that lack constitutional protections, including child care, health care, the CSU and UC, college financial aid, and much more.

In short, while state leaders will be able to manage within the Gann Limit’s constraints this year, over the longer term the spending cap is a roadblock to creating a more equitable California. Since the Gann Limit is in the state Constitution, state leaders would need to ask voters to approve any changes to it. Repealing or meaningfully reforming the Gann Limit would allow the state to make the investments needed for all Californians to be healthy and thrive.

Health

May Revision Bolsters COVID-19 Response Efforts

COVID-19 continues to be an ongoing health threat for communities across the state. Recognizing the possibility of new variants of the virus as well as future surges in cases, the May Revision reflects an increase of $1.2 billion General Fund in 2021-22 and $760.8 million General Fund in 2022-23 to bolster COVID-19 response. Of this amount, $1.1 billion would fund the SMARTER Plan for the next phase of California’s pandemic response. 

In order to implement the SMARTER Plan, the May Revision includes: 

  • $530 million to increase COVID-19 testing, specifically to purchase additional antigen tests, support testing at schools, and continue rapid testing and treatment sites. 
  • $468 million to support services for newly arrived migrants and border communities, such as temporary shelter, vaccinations, testing, and quarantine services.
  • $250 million for unanticipated COVID-19 emergency response needs.
  • $230 million for the Office of Community Partnerships and Strategic Communications to continue COVID-19 vaccine-related public education and outreach campaigns.
  • $183 million for COVID-19 operations support, including the COVID-19 call center, contractor support, and the Public Health Reserve Corps
  • $158 million to implement a program for therapeutic treatment, which would specifically target uninsured and underinsured Californians
  • $100 million for medical surge staffing to support health care facilities during COVID-19 surges.
  • $93 million for vaccination efforts. This funding would sustain mobile vaccination sites and support uptake of boosters for eligible Californians.
  • $40 million to support staffing for vaccinations. This funding would help the state prepare for the release of vaccines for children under five.
  • $16 million to continue tracking and monitoring of COVID-19 transmission, such as through wastewater surveillance, epidemiologic data analysis, modeling of future data trends, and research on the long-term impacts of COVID-19.

Public Health Support Maintained, More Needed to Promote Health Equity

The California Department of Public Health as well as local public health departments play a critical role in protecting and promoting Californians’ health and well-being. Yet despite this important responsibility, funding has not kept pace with the cost of responding to ongoing and emerging health threats. Many Californians suffered as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic due to the state’s lack of preparedness. Most notably, communities of color experienced higher rates of illness and death due to historic and ongoing structural racism that deny many communities the opportunity to be healthy and thrive. The intersection of the pandemic and structural racism continues to highlight the need to address the root cause of health disparities. 

The governor’s revised budget maintains many public health investments that were proposed in January, including $300 million ongoing General Fund to improve public health infrastructure at the state and local level. Under this proposal, local health jurisdictions would receive a minimum base allocation to support workforce expansion, data collection and integration, and partnerships with health care delivery systems and community-based organizations. At the state level, this funding would establish a new Office of Policy and Planning to assess current and emerging public health threats as well as support other core functions, including emergency preparedness and public health communications. 

This funding provides much-needed support for public health infrastructure, but state leaders can make additional investments to bolster the public health workforce at the local level. Doing so can help to ensure that counties and cities have the capacity to address ongoing and future public health threats. State leaders can also do more to advance health equity. Given that structural racism continues to have a profound impact on the health and well-being of many communities across the state, the governor’s administration and other state leaders can employ a variety of strategies to combat the effects of historical and ongoing racist policies and practices. Such strategies include declaring racism a public health crisis at the state level and establishing dedicated funding to support community-based organizations, clinics, and tribal organizations in their efforts to advance health equity.

Revised Budget Maintains Expansion of Medi-Cal to All Undocumented Immigrants

Building on the federal Affordable Care Act (ACA), California has substantially expanded access to health coverage in recent years. For example, more than 14 million Californians with modest incomes — nearly half of whom are Latinx — receive free or low-cost health care through Medi-Cal (California’s Medicaid program), several million more than before the ACA took effect. Another 1.5 million Californians receive subsidies to reduce the cost of coverage purchased through Covered California, our state’s health insurance marketplace. Nonetheless, many Californians — including many immigrants who are undocumented — remain uninsured while those with health coverage often face high monthly premiums and excessive out-of-pocket costs, such as copays and deductibles, when they seek health care services.

The May Revision:

  • Maintains the governor’s January proposal to expand Medi-Cal eligibility to undocumented immigrants ages 26 to 49, the last group of income-eligible undocumented immigrants in California who are excluded from comprehensive Medi-Cal coverage. The governor assumes that implementation would occur no sooner than January 2024. Health care and immigrant advocates have called for this expansion to take effect earlier.
  • Proposes $933 million in one-time payments to around 600,000 hospital and nursing facility workers. These payments are intended “to help retain this critical workforce,” according to the administration. The state would provide a baseline payment and would increase the payment “up to $1,500 if employers commit to fully matching the additional amount.” 
  • Includes $304 million to reboot state premium subsidies for Californians with low- and middle-incomes who buy health coverage through Covered California, our state’s online health insurance marketplace. State premium subsidies were in effect in 2020 and 2021 but were suspended when the federal government began providing enhanced federal premium subsidies through the American Rescue Plan Act. With these enhanced federal subsidies expected to expire at the end of 2022, the governor proposes to restart the state’s own subsidy program, which reduces the cost of health insurance premiums for Californians with incomes up to 600% of the federal poverty line. However, these state subsidies would provide much less assistance than is currently available through the soon-to-expire enhanced federal subsidies ($1.7 billion per year).
  • Provides $100 million to help increase generic manufacturing of insulin and ultimately reduce the cost of this vital medication. The administration suggests that “CalRx biosimilar insulin products” would cost less than the current market price ($300 per vial) and would “disrupt market forces” that drive up the cost of insulin. The administration also notes that affordable insulin is an equity issue for people of color and Californians with low incomes, who are “much more likely to have diabetes-related complications, such as renal disease and amputations.”
  • Includes $57 million — on top of the $68 million proposed in January — to improve the availability and affordability of reproductive health care services. In response to the US Supreme Court’s likely decision to overturn Roe v. Wade as well as to growing restrictions on abortion access across the country, the May Revision includes proposals to bolster access to reproductive health care services and “prepare for the influx” of people from other states seeking reproductive health care services. This new package would provide $40 million to help reproductive health care providers offset the cost of providing abortion care services to people with low and moderate incomes who lack health coverage. Another $15 million would go to community-based organizations to provide medically and culturally competent outreach and education on sexual and reproductive health issues. The remaining $2 million would be used to develop and maintain a website focusing on reproductive rights as well as to conduct research on unmet needs for reproductive health care. These investments would come on top of the $68 million that the governor proposed in January to bolster reproductive health care in California.
  • Expands the governor’s January proposal to create Equity and Practice payments for Medi-Cal providers. The May Revision proposes $300 million ($150 million General Fund) for these payments, which would be on top of the $400 million ($200 million General Fund) the governor proposed in January. This funding would be available over five years, with the payments focused on “advancing equity, addressing COVID-19 driven health disparities, and improving quality measures in children’s preventive, maternity, and behavioral health care.” 
  • Proposes to continue certain flexibilities in the Medi-Cal program that would otherwise expire when the federal COVID-19 public health emergency ends on July 15. The revised budget includes $176.5 million ($71.2 million General Fund) to extend several flexibilities, including separate payments to Federally Qualified Health Centers for COVID-19 vaccinations, “presumptive eligibility” for older adults and people with disabilities, and reimbursing at 100% of the federal Medicare rate for oxygen and respiratory durable medical equipment.
  • Includes several proposals aimed at helping eligible Medi-Cal beneficiaries maintain coverage as the state prepares to resume annual eligibility renewals. With the end of the federal COVID-19 public health emergency on July 15 (unless extended), California will once again be required to annually verify Medi-Cal beneficiaries’ eligibility — a requirement that was temporarily suspended by the federal government at the outset of the pandemic. The state will have 14 months to complete annual eligibility renewals for almost all 14 million-plus Californians enrolled in Medi-Cal, a process that will involve a number of entities including counties, Medi-Cal managed care plans, and community-based organizations. The May Revision continues to include $146 million ($73 million General Fund) over two fiscal years to address counties’ workload costs due to annual eligibility renewals. The May Revision also includes two new key proposals related to Medi-Cal eligibility. First, it proposes $60 million ($30 million General Fund), available over four years, to continue funding Health Enrollment Navigators, who help Californians connect with and maintain Medi-Cal coverage. Second, the May Revision includes $25 million ($12.5 million General Fund) to support a media and outreach campaign to 1) educate Medi-Cal enrollees about the soon-to-be-reinstated annual eligibility renewal process and 2) encourage them to update their contact information with their counties.

Revised Budget Increases Funding to Support Children’s Mental Health

The May Revision builds on the significant investments that state leaders have made to support Californians’ behavioral health needs (mental health conditions and/or substance use disorders), which have increased as a result of the ongoing pandemic. The administration acknowledges the toll on children and youth in particular and proposes additional funding to urgently address their behavioral health needs. 

The revised budget includes the following changes for the Children and Youth Behavioral Health Initiative, which aims to transform California’s behavioral health system for all children and youth: 

  • An additional $85 million General Fund to increase Children and Youth Behavioral Health Initiative grants to schools, cities, counties, tribes, and/or community-based organizations. These grants would support programs that teach wellness and mindfulness practices to teachers and students. Grants could also be used to expand parent support and training programs to help parents address their children’s behavioral health needs.
  • An additional $65 million ($32 million General Fund) to increase access to behavioral health services for students, bringing the total to $194 million ($97 million General Fund) for the Student Behavioral Health Incentive Program. This increase in 2022-23 reflects a change to the timing of payments in the Children and Youth Behavioral Health Initiative. 
  • $100 million General Fund in the 2021-22 Budget Act for school behavioral health partnerships and capacity would shift to 2023-24.  
  • About $3 million General Fund for the CalHOPE Student Support that was previously included in 2021-22 would shift to 2022-23.

The May Revision also includes proposals for suicide prevention efforts, highlighting the need to address youth suicide rates, particularly among transgender youth and Black youth. Specifically, the May Revision includes:

  • $40 million General Fund for the Youth Suicide Prevention Program. This funding would develop and implement a data-driven and community-based youth suicide prevention program for youth at an increased risk of suicide, including Black, Native American, Latnix, and foster youth.
  • $50 million to support school and community-based crisis response. This funding would allow schools to pilot a new approach of designating youth suicide and youth suicide attempts as a reportable public health event, which would trigger screening and resource connections to support youth.

The revised budget also includes $64.7 million General Fund in 2022-23 to administer the governor’s proposed Community Assistance, Recovery and Empowerment (CARE) Court plan that was unveiled in early March. See the Homelessness and Housing section for more information. 

Building on the opioid response investments included in the governor’s January proposal, the May Revision includes an additional one-time $41.8 million Opioid Settlements Fund in 2022-23 and allocates the funding as follows:

  • $29.1 million for substance use disorder provider workforce training, bringing the total to $51.1 million for this program.
  • $10 million for the naloxone distribution project targeting unhoused populations, bringing the total to $15 million for this program.
  • $2.7 million for a public awareness campaign targeted towards youth opioid education and awareness and fentanyl risk education at the California Department of Public Health, which brings the total to $40.8 million for this program.

Press conference of governor of the state of California concept. Seal of the governor of the State of California on the tribune with flag of USA and California state. 3d illustration

The Governor’s May Revision Explained

Save the date + register now!

Join us on May 20 as our Budget Center experts explore what the governor’s budget proposals mean for Californians with low incomes who we know are most struggling to make ends meet.

Homelessness & Housing

Governor’s New Homelessness Proposals Prioritize Interim Housing and Homekey

Having a place to call home is the most basic foundation for health and well-being no matter one’s age, gender, race, or zip code. But more than 161,000 Californians were experiencing homelessness and its destructive effects in early 2020, with Black, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, and LGBTQ+ Californians particularly affected by inequitable burdens of homelessness, and many older adults experiencing homelessness.

The May Revision maintains the governor’s January homelessness proposals, which emphasize clearing encampments and funding interim housing and treatment services for unhoused individuals with serious behavioral health issues. New proposals to address homelessness in the May Revision include:

  • An additional $150 million in the current year for the Homekey program, administered through the Department of Housing and Community Development, which provides funds for local entities to acquire, rehabilitate, convert, or build permanent or interim housing for people experiencing or at risk of homelessness. This brings the total proposed Homekey funding to $2.9 billion over two years. 
  • A new allocation of $250 million General Fund each year in 2022-23 and 2023-24 for grants to local governments to create interim housing on state-owned land — for example “tiny homes” — intended as bridge housing for unsheltered individuals who could eventually transition to long-term housing that will be developed in upcoming years.

Some interim housing is needed within the homeless services system to meet urgent housing needs, but the most effective approaches to addressing homelessness — including for individuals with serious behavioral health needs — combine long-term housing with supportive services as needed. This housing can include leased units or tenant-based rental assistance as well as deed-restricted units. Besides the modest one-year increase in Homekey funding, the governor’s revised budget proposes no new investments to produce or acquire permanent affordable housing (see the Housing section) or to fund rental subsidies to enable individuals to exit homelessness.

Another significant proposal described in the revised budget is the Community Assistance, Recovery and Empowerment (CARE) Court, a plan to establish court-ordered treatment for people experiencing both homelessness and serious behavioral health challenges (see the CARE Court section).

The May Revision also maintains the $1 billion in flexible local funding in 2022-23 through the Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) Program that was provided through the 2021-22 budget as $1 billion annually for two years, with the intent to continue in future years “based upon performance and need.” In the May Revision, the governor proposes extending this annual funding beyond 2022-23 but requiring that local entities focus the spending on “highest priority needs, such as encampment resolution, Homekey operating sustainability, and CARE Court housing supports.” Continuing this funding commitment is important to sustain new projects and support existing effective local efforts, but requiring that the funding be spent on specific items would reduce flexibility to focus on identified local needs and gaps in services, which could reduce its effectiveness.

Governor Meets Emergency Rental Assistance Commitment, but Fails to Boost Investment in Affordable Housing

All Californians deserve a safe and stable place to call home, yet California’s serious housing affordability challenges continue to threaten the well-being of families and communities and the future growth of the state — with renters, those with low incomes, and Latinx, Black, and immigrant Californians most severely affected. 

The Governor’s May Revision maintains the $1.5 billion one-time General Fund (to be spent across 2022-23 and 2023-24) proposed in January to boost funding in some programs that support affordable housing development and preservation. The annual $500 million boost for the state Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) and multi-year funding allocation for student housing are also maintained. For future years, the May Revision proposes an additional $500 million General Fund, over 2023-24 and 2024-25, to increase “downtown-oriented and affordable housing” developed through “adaptive reuse” of underutilized commercial and retail space.

Beyond the $150 million for Homekey, described in the Homelessness section, the Governor proposes no new investments for development, acquisition, or preservation of affordable housing for 2022-23 in the May Revision – despite record-breaking revenues above January projections and constitutional budget rules (including the Gann limit and Proposition 2, see Gann Limit and Reserves sections) that encourage or require substantial spending on infrastructure this year. This represents a key missed opportunity to invest in long-term solutions to the state’s housing affordability crisis at a time when about half of renters with low incomes are facing housing hardship and “shovel ready” affordable housing projects face a funding backlog.

In terms of direct assistance to Californians experiencing hardship, the May Revision includes support for both rent and utility assistance by:

  • Meeting the commitment state policymakers made through early budget action to fulfill all eligible requests for emergency rental assistance submitted by March 31, 2022 through the COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP), allocating $2.7 billion one-time General Fund in the current year for that purpose. 
  • Proposing one-time funding of $1.2 billion for past-due residential energy bill balances, through the California Arrearage Payment Program, and
  • Allocating one-time funding of $200 million for past-due residential water and wastewater charges, through the Low-Income Household Water Assistance Program.

Both utility assistance programs are administered by the Department of Community Services and Development.

Proposed CARE Court Framework Lacks Housing First Practices

Addressing the growing number of unhoused Californians has become one of the most serious issues facing the state and a top priority for policymakers. The current homelessness challenge is primarily due to the severe shortage of affordable housing — especially for people with the lowest incomes. However, for the minority of unhoused Californians with behavioral health conditions or substance use issues, inadequate investments in behavioral health services has also been a compounding factor, among others. 

In an attempt to target the small number of unhoused individuals that lack decision-making capacity due to an untreated serious behavioral health condition, the May Revision includes the governor’s proposed Community, Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Court plan that was unveiled in early March. The proposal creates a new framework to provide at-risk or unhoused Californians with untreated schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorders, who may also have substance use disorders, with a court-ordered treatment plan. Individuals can be referred to CARE Court by behavioral health providers, community-based social services, family, first responders, or other specified parties. 

As proposed, all counties would participate in the program, but it does not require courts to order housing or to require the county to provide housing. This structure does not prioritize effective “housing first” interventions that provide the housing and supportive services needed for individuals to maintain stable housing and live a healthy life. If individuals are deemed to have not successfully completed their mandated Care Plan, they may be referred to conservatorship. 

To administer CARE Court, the May Revision proposes $64.7 million General Fund in 2022-23. This includes $39.5 million General Fund in 2022-23 and $37.7 million ongoing General Fund for the Judicial Branch, $10 million ongoing General Fund for the Department of Aging for the CARE Court Supporter Program, and $15.2 million General Fund in 2022-23, with smaller ongoing funds to the Department of Health Care Services for training and technical assistance, data collection, and evaluation. The administration estimates that CARE Court would serve 7,000-12,000 individuals. 
Given the limited scale of the proposed new program, and the lack of a “housing first” approach, the proposed funding could be better spent in investing in existing housing and behavioral health supports (see the Homelessness, Housing, and Behavioral Health sections).

Economic Security

May Revision Maintains Refundable Tax Credit Proposals

The governor’s revised budget maintains his January proposals to:

  • End the work requirement for the Young Child Tax Credit (YCTC) and annually adjust the credit for inflation so that it keeps up with rising prices, at a cost of $55 million and $14 million in 2022-23, respectively.
  • Establish a new refundable tax credit for former foster youth modeled after the Young Child Tax Credit, at a cost of roughly $20 million ongoing; and
  • Provide $10 million to support efforts to increase awareness of California’s Earned Income Tax Credit (CalEITC) and YCTC and connect tax filers with low incomes to free tax preparation services. This is $5 million less than the state provided in the 2021-22 budget. However, the administration indicated that they intend to build this $10 million into the Franchise Tax Board’s baseline budget so that this program is funded on an ongoing basis. 

As in January, the revised budget does not include any proposals to strengthen or expand the CalEITC.

May Revision Maintains Medi-Cal Expansion, but Fails to Expand Food Assistance to All Undocumented Immigrants

California has the largest share of immigrant residents of any state and is home to an estimated 2 million to 3.1 million individuals who are undocumented. Half of all California workers are immigrants or children of immigrants. These Californians are deeply integrated into our communities, schools, and workplaces. Prioritizing the urgent needs of undocumented immigrants and their families is an important opportunity for California’s policymakers to make our support systems more equitably inclusive, to make our state’s economy more resilient, and to lead in this time where the state has the resources. 

Specifically, the May Revision:

  • Maintains the governor’s proposal to expand comprehensive Medi-Cal coverage to all undocumented Californians starting no sooner than January 2024. In recent years, California has expanded eligibility for comprehensive Medi-Cal coverage to undocumented immigrants up to age 25 and adults age 50 and older who otherwise qualify for the program. The governor’s May Revision maintains his proposal from January to expand comprehensive Medi-Cal coverage to undocumented adults ages 26 to 49 starting no sooner than January 1, 2024 (See Coverage, Affordability, and Access section).
  • Maintains the govenor’s proposal to limit the expansion of the California Food Assistance Program (CFAP) to undocumented Californians who are age 55 or older. CFAP provides state-funded basic nutrition assistance for Californians who are blocked from CalFresh, California’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), due to xenophobic and racist rules. 
  • Provides funding to support newly arrived migrants and “border operations.” This includes $175 million one-time General Fund for the Department of Social Services to administer rapid response efforts to support migrant arrivals at the southern border; $468 million for the Department of Public Health for “border operations” and “humanitarian activities at the southern border,”  including temporary shelter, testing, vaccines, and support services for newly arrived migrants; and an additional $9 million is allocated to the California Office of Emergency Services for “border response operations.”

The May Revision misses an opportunity to extend targeted economic support to undocumented families who have been excluded from thousands of dollars in federal aid and other support programs to help families meet their basic needs during the pandemic, including unemployment benefits. The administration’s proposal to expand food assistance to adults age 55 and older is an important step. But more than half of children in undocumented immigrant families live in poverty. Completing this expansion to include Californians of all ages, regardless of immigration status, is necessary to truly dismantle racist and xenophobic barriers and to address persistent gaps in federal aid.

Revised Proposal Yields Mixed Progress for CalWORKs Families

The California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) is a critical support that provides modest cash assistance for families with low incomes, particularly families of color. Monthly CalWORKs grants are adjusted according to the number of people in the household who are eligible for CalWORKs. A family member may be excluded from grant calculations for reasons including having exceeded the time limit for assistance, not meeting work requirements, or due to their immigration status. These situations are not rare but rather represent almost two-thirds of CalWORKs cases. 

In recent years state policymakers have raised the maximum CalWORKs grant above the deep poverty threshold (50% of the federal poverty line) for some CalWORKs families but not for those with an excluded family member, unfairly leaving them out of receiving sufficient assistance for basic needs. In the revised budget, the administration again misses the opportunity to raise CalWORKs grants above deep poverty for all families. The May Revision includes an 11% increase to CalWORKs grants (at an estimated $296.2 million in 2022-23). This increase is due to AB 85 of 2013, which provides a grant increase based on projected sales tax revenues. For example, under the governor’s proposal, while a family of three with no excluded members would receive a grant that is above deep poverty at 53% of the federal poverty line, a family with an excluded member would receive a grant that is below deep poverty at just 42% of the federal poverty line. To ensure grants are above deep poverty for all families, state legislators should also provide an additional 18% grant increase targeted to families with an excluded member.

The May Revision maintains the January proposal to allow former CalWORKs families to receive outstanding child support debt that currently goes to the state, county, and federal governments as “reimbursement” for the costs associated with the CalWORKs program. Under this change, these families would receive an estimated annual total pass through of $187 million. State leaders should build on this change to end racist policies that block Black, Latinx, and other families from economic security by also passing through 100% of child support payments to current CalWORKs and Medi-Cal recipients and ending the state’s collection of interest on child support debt.

May Revision Maintains Governor’s CalKIDS Proposal

The California Kids Investment and Development Savings (CalKIDS) program was created in 2019-20 to establish college savings accounts for all newborns and deposit at least $25 into those accounts. In 2021-22, the program was expanded to establish accounts for all public school students in grades 1-12 who live in families with low incomes and to deposit $500 into those accounts, with an additional $500 for foster youth and $500 for homeless students, up to a maximum of $1,500 per child. CalKIDS is expected to launch this summer.

The May Revision proposes to allocate $299,000 one-time General Fund and $1.5 million ongoing General Fund beginning in 2023-24 to support last year’s expansion of the CalKIDS program and to support outreach costs. This is a reduction in funding from the governor’s January budget which proposed allocating $170 million ongoing General Fund to support the expansion of CalKIDS as well as $5 million one-time and $5.2 million ongoing General Fund to support outreach and implementation costs.

Governor Fails to Increase Payment Rates for Subsidized Child Care Providers

California’s subsidized child care and development system has long been critical to the state’s economic infrastructure, helping families struggling to make ends meet cover the high cost of early care and education for their children. The governor’s May Revision would maintain federal child care relief funding that was included in the January proposal to expand child care programs to serve an additional 36,000 children ($22.5 million for General Child Care and $247.3 million for the Alternative Payment Program). Yet, the May Revision would not increase provider payment rates for the 2022-23 state fiscal year, despite stagnant payment rates, the rising statewide minimum wage, and the increasing price of food and supplies

Other child care investments in the May Revision include:

  • $200.5 million for child care infrastructure. This includes $100 million General Fund and $100.5 million federal funds for minor renovation and repairs to child care facilities in child care deserts and low-income communities.
  • $136 million to extend family fee waivers for one year. Under federal law, most families must pay a family fee for subsidized child care. California took advantage of flexibility offered by the federal government during the pandemic to waive these fees to boost family economic security. The May Revision provides $136 million in federal Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplementary Appropriation relief funds to continue this waiver until June 30, 2023.
  • $114 million to pay providers based on enrollment. Prior to the pandemic, the state paid subsidized child care and California State Preschool Program providers based on whether or not a child was in attendance. During the pandemic, state leaders opted to reimburse providers based on enrollment, similar to the private market, to stabilize providers’ budgets. The May Revision would continue this reimbursement policy through the 2022-2023 fiscal year, primarily using federal funds.
  • $20 million to boost administrative capacity in the Alternative Payment Program. The Alternative Payment Program provides subsidized child care vouchers to eligible families. The May Revision provides funding to enable these community-based programs to expand services and enroll additional children and families in the Alternative Payment Program.

Finally, the administration has not made any proposals to further boost the economic security of child care providers, such as by offering health care or retirement benefits. Nor have state leaders provided resources for workforce development training — funding that was rescinded in the 2021-22 budget agreement due to pandemic-related budget uncertainties.

California’s paid family leave and state disability insurance programs allow workers to take paid time off from work to attend to their own health or that of a family member. The Disability Insurance Fund — funded entirely by California workers’ contributions — provides benefits to workers when care needs arise. Policymakers temporarily increased payment rates for these programs in 2018 from 55% of earnings to 70% for workers with very low pay and 60% of earnings for all other workers, including full-time workers paid the minimum wage. Yet workers paid very low wages are far less likely to utilize the benefits they’ve paid for. 
Californians should be able to take paid time off to care for themselves or their family without risking their jobs or financial security. Governor Newsom’s paid family leave task force and Master Plan for Early Learning and Care both recommended that payment rates be increased to 90% for some workers to increase access for workers paid low wages, but the administration’s revised budget does not increase payment rates for these critical programs. And without action this year, payment rates will revert to just 55% of earnings at the end of 2022.

May Revision Does Not Accelerate a Pending Increase to State SSP Grants

Supplemental Security Income/State Supplementary Payment (SSI/SSP) grants help well over 1 million low-income seniors and people with disabilities to pay for housing and other necessities. Grants are provided to individuals and couples and are funded with both federal (SSI) and state (SSP) dollars. State policymakers made deep cuts to the SSP portion of these grants in 2009 and 2011 to help close budget shortfalls caused by the Great Recession. Except for a small increase provided in 2017, the recession-era cuts to SSP grants remained in effect for more than a decade.

State leaders changed course last year and adopted a substantial (24%) increase to SSP grants that took effect on January 1, 2022. The maximum monthly SSP grant for individuals jumped from $160.72 to $199.21. For couples, the maximum monthly SSP grant rose from $407.14 to $504.64.

Also as part of the 2021-22 budget package, state leaders committed to providing an additional substantial increase to SSP grants in January 2024, subject to funding being provided in the 2023-24 state budget. In the meantime, advocates for older adults and people with disabilities have called on state leaders to accelerate this increase to provide a permanent and more timely boost to the modest budgets of SSI/SSP recipients as the cost of housing, food, and other necessities continues to rise.

The May Revision:

  • Does not propose to accelerate the pending increase to the state’s SSP portion of SSI/SSP grants. As a result, the maximum SSI/SSP grant for individuals will remain below the federal poverty line for at least another year and a half.

Lacks significant new investments to address the needs of older adults and people with disabilities and advance the bold goals included in the Master Plan for Aging.

support the Budget Center

Want to support our work? Please consider donating to the Budget Center to help advance understanding and transparency in the state budget process and create a more inclusive California.

Education

Administration Continues Push for Pre-Kindergarten Programs

The state currently funds two pre-kindergarten programs: transitional kindergarten (TK) and the California State Preschool Program. TK is a two-year kindergarten program offered at local educational agencies (LEAs) to children turning five between September 2 and December 2 of each year. The 2021-22 budget agreement included a multi-year plan to expand the state’s existing TK program to all four-year-olds in the state. The May Revision builds off of the transitional kindergarten proposals included in the January proposal, by eliminating credential requirements for TK teachers through June 30, 2026. 
The May revision also proposes two additional changes to the California State Preschool Program, including the substantial changes to this program included in the January proposal. The California State Preschool Program is an early learning program for children from low and moderate income families offered by community based organizations and LEAs. The May Revision proposals include two items: 1) $21.6 million to waive family fees for participating children ($10.8 million Proposition 98 and $10.8 million General Fund) and 2) paying California State Preschool Program providers based on enrollment, not attendance — a policy known to stabilize funding for subsidized early care and education providers (see Child Care section).

Increased Revenues Significantly Boost the Minimum Funding Level for K-14 Education

Approved by voters in 1988, Proposition 98 constitutionally guarantees a minimum level of funding for K-12 schools, community colleges, and the state preschool program. Changes in state General Fund revenues tend to affect the Prop. 98 guarantee, and the May Revision’s estimates of 2021-22 and 2022-23 revenues are significantly higher than those estimated in January’s budget proposal. As a result, the May Revision assumes a 2022-23 Prop. 98 funding level of $110.3 billion, $8.4 billion above the level assumed in the Governor’s proposed budget, and a 2021-22 Prop. 98 funding level of $110.2 billion, $11.1 billion above the level assumed in January. The revised budget assumes a 2020-21 Prop. 98 funding level of $96.1 billion, slightly above the $95.9 billion funding level assumed by the Governor in January. 

Revenue projections in the Governor’s January budget proposal would have required total deposits of $9.7 billion into the Public School System Stabilization Account (PSSSA) — the state budget reserve for K-12 schools and community colleges. However, the May Revision projects a decrease in capital gains revenues as a share of total taxes that would reduce required PSSSA deposits and bring the total account balance to $9.5 billion in 2022-23. (See Reserves section.) Because the PSSSA balance is projected to exceed 3% of the total K-12 share of the Prop. 98 minimum funding level in 2021-22, current law would prevent K-12 school districts from maintaining more than 10% of their budgets in local reserves beginning in 2022-23.

May Revision Dramatically Increases Funding for Several K-12 Education Programs

The largest share of Prop. 98 spending goes to California’s school districts, charter schools, and county offices of education (COEs), which provide instruction to 5.9 million students in grades kindergarten through 12. The governor’s revised spending plan significantly increases funding for the state’s equity-based K-12 education funding formula, the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), but proposes a less equitable per-pupil formula to allocate a large discretionary block grant. Specifically, the May Revision:

  • Allocates $8 billion for a one-time “discretionary block grant.” The governor proposes to use a per-pupil formula to allocate the block grant to local educational agencies (LEAs), which could be used for a wide variety of purposes including maintaining staff levels and addressing student learning challenges. Under the governor’s proposal, funding received by LEAs would reduce outstanding state mandate debts, which reflect the cost of state-mandated services that LEAs provided in prior years but for which they have not yet been reimbursed. Allocating these one-time grant funds on a per-pupil basis arguably fails to meet the goal of equitable funding established by the LCFF. 
  • Allocates $3.8 billion to modify the LCFF. The LCFF provides school districts, charter schools, and COEs a base grant per student, adjusted to reflect the number of students at various grade levels, as well as additional grants for the costs of educating English learners, students from low-income families, and foster youth. Because many school districts are experiencing reductions in average daily attendance (ADA) and LCFF base grants are calculated based on ADA, the governor’s January budget proposed changing the LCFF base grant calculation to allow LEAs to use the average of three prior years’ ADA. The May Revision maintains the proposed option for LEAs to use a three-year rolling average of ADA to calculate base grants, but would modify how 2021-22 ADA is calculated to allow classroom-based LEAs to “be funded at the greater of their current year average daily attendance or their current year enrollment adjusted for pre-COVID-19 absence rates.” The administration estimates a total cost of $3.3 billion ongoing and $463 million one-time to implement these changes to the LCFF.
  • Adds $2.2 billion in ongoing funding for LCFF base grants. The May Revision would boost LCFF base grant funding for K-12 school districts and charter schools by $2.1 billion and for COEs by $101.2 million. 
  • Includes funding for a 6.56% LCFF cost of living adjustment (COLA). The May Revision notes that the 6.56% COLA would be the largest since the LCFF was implemented. The governor’s January budget proposal provided $2.1 billion to fund a 5.33% COLA for the LCFF. 
  • Includes $1.8 billion in one-time Prop. 98 funding for deferred maintenance of school facilities. The May Revision would provide these funds to LEAs for a variety of purposes such as repairing and restoring classrooms. The revised budget proposal would allocate $100,000 to each COE and the remainder of funds to LEAs in an equal amount per their unduplicated number of English learners, foster youth, and students from low-income families.
  • Adjusts one-time non-Prop. 98 General Fund K-12 school facilities spending. The governor’s January budget proposed spending $1.3 billion in 2022-23 and $925 million in 2023-24 to support new construction and modernization projects through the School Facilities Program. Instead, the May Revision proposes to appropriate these dollars in the current fiscal year (2021-22). 
  • Expands one-time funding for community schools by $1.5 billion. Community schools provide integrated educational, health, and mental health services to students. The 2021 budget agreement provided $3 billion for community school grants. Despite this level of funding, the May Revision states that demand for the grants exceeded expectations and that additional funding would expand access to the program. 
  • Allocates more than $800 million in one-time funding to support educator workforce programs. The governor’s proposal includes $500 million to expand the Teacher Residency Grant Program for teachers and school counselors, $300 million to increase professional development resources available through the Educator Effectiveness Block Grant, and $15 million over three years to continue the work of the Educator Workforce Investment Grant Program in areas of special education and support for English learners.
  • Includes $611.8 million in ongoing funding for school nutrition programs. In January, the governor proposed $596 million to fund a requirement included in the 2021 budget agreement that all public schools provide two free meals per day to any student regardless of income eligibility in 2022-23. The May Revision would expand funding to increase the state meal reimbursement rate beginning in 2022-23. To the extent an increase in federal school meal reimbursement rates frees up state funds, the revised budget proposes to reallocate state funding for the Kitchen Infrastructure and Training Grant Program. 
  • Adds $403 million in ongoing funding for the Expanded Learning Opportunities Program (ELOP). The revised spending plan increases the governor’s January budget proposal to provide $3.4 billion in ongoing funding for the ELOP to provide additional learning time for students before or after school, as well as outside of the traditional school year. 
  • Allocates $100 million in one-time funding to expand the Community Engagement Initiative (CEI). The CEI’s goals include building the capacity of communities and school districts to facilitate conversations that focus on improving student outcomes. The May Revision proposes to expand the number of LEAs that have been reached by the initiative since it was established in 2018. 
  • Allocates $62.1 million to increase the COLA for non-LCFF programs. The May Revision increases the COLA for several categorical programs that remain outside of the LCFF to 6.56% from the 5.33% provided in January.

The Revised Budget Includes Base Augmentations for the California Community Colleges

A portion of Proposition 98 funding provides support for California’s Community Colleges (CCCs), the largest postsecondary education system in the country, which serves high percentages of students of color and students with low incomes. CCCs prepare approximately 1.8 million students to transfer to four-year institutions or to obtain training and employment skills. 

The 2022-23 revised budget proposes to increase funding for deferred maintenance projects at the CCCs, increase base funding for the Student Centered Funding Formula (SCFF), and provide a large one-time discretionary block grant using a less equitable allocation method than the SCFF. Specifically, the revised spending plan:

  • Provides $1.1 billion one-time Prop. 98 dollars for deferred maintenance projects. The funds are intended to support deferred maintenance and energy efficiency projects at the CCCs. These dollars are in addition to the $387.6 million proposed in January. 
  • Includes $750 million one-time Prop. 98 dollars for discretionary block grants to CCC districts. Grants are intended to support districts in addressing pandemic-related issues and “reduce long-term obligations.” Grants would be allocated by the California Community College Chancellor’s Office based on the number of full-time equivalent students and can be used for any purpose determined by each community college district. Allocating these one-time dollars based on the number of full-time equivalent students arguably fails to meet the goal of equitable funding established by the SCFF.
  • Provides $375 million ongoing Prop. 98 dollars for base increases for the SCFF. These dollars include $250 million to increase funding rates for all components of the SCFF and an additional $125 million to boost the SCFF’s base allocation. 
  • Allocates nearly $85 million ongoing Prop. 98 for a COLA for apportionments and enrollment growth. The revised budget includes an increase of $83.5 million to reflect a higher COLA (6.56%) for apportionments. The 6.56% COLA (up from 5.33% in the January budget) increases total funding to $492.9 million. The budget also includes an additional $1.3 million for a 0.5% enrollment growth for a total of $26.2 million for this item.
  • Includes nearly $62 million Prop. 98 dollars to support apprenticeships. The revised budget includes $45 million in one-time dollars for the California Healthy School Meals Pathways Program and $16.9 ongoing to make changes to the apprenticeship program Related and Supplemental Instruction rate. 

Proposed Budget Provides Multi-Year Investments in the CSU and the UC

California supports two public four-year higher education institutions: the California State University (CSU) and the University of California (UC). The CSU provides undergraduate and graduate education to roughly 462,000 students on 23 campuses, and the UC provides undergraduate, graduate, and professional education to about 290,000 students on 10 campuses. For both institutions, the administration maintains the governor’s January proposal of a multi-year budget through 2026-27, focused on increasing enrollment, raising graduation rates and closing graduation gaps, increasing affordability of on-campus housing, and decreasing non-tuition costs. 

For the CSU, the revised budget provides the following adjustments in addition to the $304.1 million ongoing General Fund proposed in January:

  • $147.5 million to invest in facilities to support the growth of a STEM workforce to meet the state’s goals on climate change.
  • An additional $25 million one-time General Fund to support CSU University Farms.
  • An increase of $1.5 million General Fund to support services for foster youth at CSU East Bay and CSU Northridge. 

For the UC, the revised budget provides the following adjustments in addition to the $307.3 million ongoing General Fund proposed in January:

  • $514.1 million one-time General Fund to fund various programs, including research on the digital economy and biotechnology, graduate medical education, fire advisors for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, and African American studies at UCLA. Of the $500 million allocated for biotechnology research, only $300 million is for 2022-23.
  • $13 million ongoing General Fund to support and expand UC Labor Centers.
  • $1.5 million General Fund ($650,000 ongoing) to integrate independent colleges and universities onto the ASSIST web platform that supports prospective transfer students.

May Revision Misses Opportunity to Provide Additional Financial Support for Students Pursuing Higher Education

Cal Grants are the foundation of California’s financial aid program for students with low and middle incomes pursuing higher education in the state. Cal Grants provide aid for tuition and living expenses that do not have to be paid back. The May Revision estimates that over 400,000 financial aid grants will be awarded to students in the 2022-23 academic year. Ensuring Californians have access and resources to attend and thrive in the state’s higher education institutions broadens opportunities for individuals and families and strengthens our state’s workforce to drive long-term economic growth.

The governor’s revised spending plan proposes no new changes to student financial aid from those included in the governor’s January proposal. The governor misses an opportunity to better support California students. High costs of higher education, exacerbated by the economic hardship of COVID-19 pandemic, have caused many students to cancel their education plans. Since the beginning of the 2021-22 academic year, students in low-income, Black and Latinx households were most likely to cancel all plans to take classes from postsecondary institutions. The governor can continue to support students with low and middle incomes and reduce racial inequities in higher education by pursuing reforms to Cal Grants that streamline and eliminate remaining barriers that prevent more students from accessing state financial aid. In addition, more investments are needed to adequately address non-tuition costs, such as housing, food, transportation, and other basic living expenses.

Justice Systems

Governor Does Not Propose to Close More State Prisons

More than 97,000 adults who have been convicted of a felony offense are serving their sentences at the state level, down from a peak of 173,600 in 2007. American Indian, Black, and Latinx Californians are disproportionately represented in state prisons — a racial disparity that reflects implicit bias in the justice system, structural disadvantages faced by these communities, and other factors. Among all incarcerated adults, most — 92,514 — are housed in state prisons designed to hold fewer than 82,000 people. This level of overcrowding is equal to 112.9% of the prison system’s “design capacity,” which is below the prison population cap — 137.5% of design capacity — established by a 2009 federal court order. California also houses more than 4,500 people in facilities that are not subject to the cap, including fire camps, in-state “contract beds,” and community-based facilities that provide rehabilitative services. The sizable drop in incarceration has resulted both from 1) a series of justice system reforms enacted by voters and state leaders and 2) changes adopted in 2020 to further reduce prison overcrowding in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as suspending intakes from county jails and implementing early releases.

The revised budget:

  • Does not call for the closure of additional state prisons. California recently closed the state prison in Tracy and was on track to shut down the Susanville prison by the end of June 2022 until litigation filed by the city of Susanville halted the process. In the meantime, the revised budget does not outline a plan to close more prisons even though the Legislative Analyst’s Office estimates that California could close as many as five prisons over the next few years. However, the administration says it is “committed to right-sizing California’s prison system” and suggests that “it may be possible to close three additional state prisons by 2024-25” (emphasis added). Closing more prisons, particularly those with costly, decaying infrastructure, would generate substantial savings as well as reduce overreliance on incarceration, which disproportionately impacts Californians of color and does not make neighborhoods and communities safer.
  • Projects that the prison population will temporarily rise before resuming its long-term decline by 2024-25. The prison population is estimated to increase by about 3,300 between 2021-22 and 2022-23, primarily because the state has been transferring people to prison who were temporarily being held in county jails to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmissions in the prison system. However, current estimates also suggest that the prison population will soon resume its long-term decline, falling to roughly 95,700 by 2024-25.
  • Maintains the governor’s January proposal to keep providing emergency housing services to adults who are at risk of being unhoused when they leave prison. The Returning Home Well Program, which was created in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, would continue for another three years at a cost of $10.6 million General Fund annually.
  • Proposes $3 million in one-time funding to provide transitional housing for youth who are at risk of homelessness when they are discharged by the Board of Juvenile Hearings.

Proposal Maintains Inequitable Crime Reduction Plan, Modestly Invests in Additional Public Safety-Related Programs

California has adopted various justice system-related policy changes that reformed sentencing laws while still ensuring public safety. These reforms, passed through legislative action and voter approval, have led to sustained decreases in overall crime and prison population rates. Despite the relatively low and stable crime rates California has experienced since the mid-2000s, the May Revision maintains proposals that target retail theft and other crimes, and does not explicitly account for the potential racial discrimination that may arise in enforcement of those policies. 

The May Revision also proposes a series of new investments to support law enforcement, probation services, and victim supports, including:

  • $50 million one-time General Fund for officer wellness grants for efforts that support peace officers’ physical and mental health and build community relations. The grants will be administered by the Board of State and Community Corrections to counties and cities to support eligible programs.
  • $20 million one-time General Fund for mobile probation center grants to increase access to probation services, especially for unhoused Californians. The mobile centers are intended to help individuals more easily access court appearances and pre-trial check-ins and complete various types of needs assessments. 
  • $30 million one-time General Fund to establish innovative victim service pilot programs, including recovery centers in hard-to-reach and rural areas. These funds are intended to be spent over three years. 
  • $12 million one-time General Fund over three years for a competitive grant program to support California tribes in locating and identify missing Indigenous persons.
  • $7.9 million General Fund in 2022-23 and $6.7 million ongoing for the Department of Justice to establish the Fentanyl Enforcement Program. 

Workforce & Other Proposals

The Revised Budget Makes Additional Climate-Related Workforce Investments

To create pathways to jobs in industries related to the care economy and climate adaptation, the revised spending plan maintains workforce development proposals included in the January budget and adds additional investments.

The May Revision maintains investments in the care economy workforce and health-related fields. Those investments include major proposals such as $350 million for community health workers and $340 million for high road training partnerships in “family-sustaining” health care jobs. 

The revised spending plan also maintains all the investments aimed at supporting the state’s efforts to combat the climate crisis and the ongoing transition to clean energies. Those include $265 million to support the transition from oil and gas to other industries and $235 million for training programs and grants across various climate-related industries. 

The revised budget includes additional investments in workforce development opportunities related to climate adaptation, which include: 

  • $41.5 million General Fund to support the state’s response to extreme heat. This includes $24.5 million to the Department of Industrial Relations to provide targeted outreach and education to communities in order to protect workers from heat-related illnesses and smoke from wildfires. It also includes $17 million over two years to the Workforce Development Board to expand high road training partnerships with industries that support the state’s response to extreme heat conditions. See Climate Change section for other climate-related investments.

Other proposals in the revised spending plan include additional investments in apprenticeships. This includes: 

  • Nearly $62 million Prop. 98 dollars to support apprenticeship programs. As discussed in the California Community Colleges section, these funds include $45 million in one-time dollars for the California Healthy School Meals Pathways Program and $16.9 million ongoing to make changes to the apprenticeship program Related and Supplemental Instruction (RSI) rate.

The Revised Spending Plan Proposes $1.1 Billion to Bridge the Digital Divide

The pandemic has exposed the inequities in access to computers and high-speed internet, also known as the digital divide. Access to such technology is necessary to participate in education and other essential activities such as remote work, applying for jobs, virtual health appointments, and access to many other services. The digital divide disproportionately impacts low-income and Latinx households, as well as children and youth, seniors, and people with disabilities. 

The governor’s revised spending plan proposes $1.1 billion one-time over two years for broadband infrastructure. The proposal would provide $600 million in 2023-24 and $500 million in 2024-25 to the California Department of Technology (CDT) to support broadband infrastructure projects currently underway across the state. These dollars are in addition to investment of $3.25 billion for the same purpose provided in the 2021-22 budget. 

While broadband infrastructure is necessary to reach many households that are unconnected, especially in rural areas of the state, the proposal does not include support to address other aspects of the digital divide such as affordability barriers that keep many California households from connecting to the internet.

Governor Proposes Additional Relief for Small Businesses

In addition to the business tax proposals noted in the Revenue Outlook & Tax Proposals section — which are not specific to small businesses — the revised budget proposal includes some additional assistance targeted to small businesses, including:

  • $500 million one-time General Fund to provide grants of between $10,000 and $50,000 to small businesses and nonprofit organizations in industries hit hardest by the pandemic.
  • $75 million one-time General Fund to provide grants of between $30,000 and $50,000 for small agricultural businesses — those with 100 or fewer full-time employees in 2021 — that have lost revenue due to drought. 

Both of these grant programs would be administered by the Office of the Small Business Advocate (CalOSBA).

Governor Maintains Unnecessary Unemployment Insurance Loan Payment

Millions of California workers who lost their jobs during the depths of the COVID-19 pandemic used unemployment insurance benefits to pay for basic needs like food and rent. Although these benefits are supposed to be financed through employer payroll taxes, California businesses — for decades — haven’t been paying the true costs of the benefits workers need during recessions. Consequently, California’s unemployment fund has been chronically underfunded, and the state had to borrow billions of dollars from the federal government to help pay for unemployment benefits during the pandemic.

The governor’s revised budget continues to propose wasting $1 billion General Fund in 2022-23 and $2 billion in 2023-24 to pay down a portion of the state’s outstanding federal loans for these benefits. This proposal is unnecessary and amounts to a tax giveaway mostly benefiting large, profitable corporations, while wasting $3 billion that could be better spent supporting small businesses and California workers struggling to afford the high cost of living. Specifically, this proposal:

  • Is unnecessary because there is already a sensible process in place for paying off the state’s unemployment debt. Under federal law, California businesses will pay off this debt very gradually through small increases in the federal payroll tax rate. For example, in 2023, businesses will pay just $21 per worker more for the entire year. It makes sense for businesses to gradually pay off this debt since it largely resulted from decades of insufficient contributions by businesses to California’s unemployment fund prior to the pandemic.
  • Is a giveaway to large, profitable corporations that haven’t been paying the true cost of unemployment benefits for their workers for decades. The more employees a business has in California, the more a business would benefit under this proposal. One corporation that stands to benefit most is Chevron, which employs 10,000+ California workers and raked in $15.6 billion in profits last year as soaring gas prices strained the budgets of millions of Californians.

Businesses That Will Benefit Most Under Governor’s Unnecessary Unemployment Insurance Loan Payment

Company
Examples of Private-Sector Businesses with At Least 5,000 California Employees
Most Recent Annual Profit (Billions)
Alphabet (parent company of Google)$76.0
Intel$19.9
Chevron$15.6
eBay$13.6
Sony Pictures$11.0
Cisco$10.6
Amgen$5.9
Walt Disney Company$2.5
Space Exploration Tech Corp (SpaceX)*
*Not a publicly traded company so its profits are not reported publicly. However, SpaceX is estimated to be the second-highest-valued private company in the world.
Source: Employment Development Department and US Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Would provide no immediate relief to small businesses that are still recovering from the pandemic. In January, the governor indicated that one rationale for this proposal is to reduce how much small businesses will pay in increased federal payroll taxes in future years. But the proposal would primarily benefit large corporations, and “provide no near-term economic relief to employers or workers,” according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office.

Administration Increases Spending to Respond to Climate Change

The revised budget provides additional funding for various proposals intended to help California and its residents adapt and respond to climate change. This includes:

  • An additional $8 billion to support the Clean Energy Investment Plan, of which $5.2 billion will support the Strategic Electricity Reliability Reserve to help the state’s energy grid withstand extreme climate events;
  • $970 million for the Public Utility Commission to provide residential solar and storage system incentives, of which $670 million would be for low-income households;
  • An additional $1.3 billion General Fund for a wide range of projects intended to help communities, fish, and wildlife avoid the negative impacts of extreme drought;
  • $1.2 billion to reduce or eliminate past due energy bill balances for California households, as outlined in the Housing section;
  • $250 million to leverage additional state financing tools to develop strategic clean energy projects;
  • $220 million over two years to support community cooling centers, as included in the state’s updated Extreme Heat Action Plan;
  • $150.2 million ($141.7 million General Fund) and 465 positions to increase CalFIRE’s ability to respond to wildfires due to climate change;
  • $100 million one-time General Fund for the Tribal Nature-Based Solutions program to support initiatives by California’s Native American tribes that use nature-based solutions to combat the climate crisis;
  • $100 million in match funding to support carbon removal projects;
  • An additional one-time $100 million from Cap and Trade auction proceeds to increase the number of satellites launched to measure methane emissions;
  • $24.5 million General Fund to the Department of Industrial Relations to help protect workers from heat-related illness and wildfire smoke hazards;
  • An additional one-time $20 million Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for the Community Air Protection Program, which aims to reduce emissions in communities with a disproportionate exposure to air pollution; and
  • $17 million General Fund over two years to the California Workforce Development Board to support training in industries that support the state’s response to extreme heat, as outlined in the Workforce Development section.

The revised budget also outlines a plan for how to spend $768 million included in the 2021-22 budget to implement California’s Natural and Working Lands Climate Smart Strategy to advance “climate-focused land management” and the Pathways to 30×30 Strategy to accelerate conservation of California’s lands and coastal waters. In addition, the administration proposes to accelerate its $10 billion zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) plan to increase clean transportation options. Finally, the revised budget proposes converting two tax credits included in the January budget into a single Climate Innovation Grant program administered by the California Energy Commission and provides a Sales and Use Tax exclusion to incentivize projects that manufacture, process, or recover lithium, as outlined in the Revenue Outlook & Tax Proposals section.

Each year, the Budget Center comes out with a First Look analysis of the governor’s May Revision, and we are proud to provide you with this timely breakdown. Want to support our work? Please consider donating to the Budget Center to help advance understanding and transparency in the state budget process and create a more inclusive California.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

State Leaders Have Opportunity to Provide Targeted Relief to Californians Struggling to Make Ends Meet

The California Budget & Policy Center, a research and analysis nonprofit advancing public policies that expand opportunities and promote well-being for all Californians, released the following statement from Executive Director Chris Hoene following the release of Governor Newsom’s revised 2022-23 state budget proposal, or May Revision: “At the end of the day, the state budget … Continued

About this event

Our Budget Center experts will break down Governor Newsom’s May Revision and explore what the governor’s proposals mean for Californians with low incomes who we know are most struggling to make ends meet.

Watch the recording

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

5 Questions We’re Asking Ahead of the May Revision 

Our analysis First Look: Understanding the Governor’s 2022-23 May Revision In the coming days, Governor Newsom will unveil his updated 2022-23 California state budget proposal — commonly known as the May Revision or May Revise. This revised proposal outlines the governor’s economic and revenue outlook and his administration’s policy priorities, including changes since his January … Continued

Governor Gavin Newsom released his proposed 2022-23 state budget on January 10, drawing on a second year of stronger-than-expected revenues to call for a series of emergency investments to respond to the public health effects of COVID-19 and a combination of one-time and ongoing investments to provide greater support for the health and economic well-being of Californians. The proposed $213 billion General Fund spending plan includes total reserves of $35 billion.

The state’s fiscal health presents state leaders with an opportunity in the 2022-23 state budget to address California’s great paradox: How can a state with such wealth also be home to immense poverty where so many Californians are blocked from comprehensive health care, affordable housing, stable jobs, paid sick leave, reliable child care, and quality higher education? 

The governor’s budget proposal would make progress by providing comprehensive Medi-Cal for Californians who are undocumented and ages 26-49, providing cash assistance for low-income Californians through state tax credits, investing in homelessness prevention and housing, investing in behavioral health, and committing additional funding across education systems, from early learning to K-12 to higher education.

The governor’s proposals leave open the possibility of additional urgent and ongoing investments. As state leaders deliberate on the 2022-23 state budget, other priority investments that should move forward include but are not limited to:

  • Extending temporary economic support to families, including a larger amount of aid for Californians who are undocumented and excluded from federal support;
  • Expanding cash support for Californians without children;
  • Significantly increasing investments in rebuilding the child care system, particularly supporting providers who have struggled to stay open and parents who can’t find affordable care for their kids so they can go to work;
  • Providing additional paid sick leave so workers can follow public health guidelines during the pandemic and increasing paid family leave benefits;
  • Fast-tracking planned investments in the social safety net, such as Medi-Cal expansion and increases in SSI-SSP grants, currently not scheduled to begin until 2024 and within the means of the state to start earlier;
  • Expanding CalWORKs to include children in all eligible households;
  • Monitoring K-12 funding and enrollment formulas to ensure students and schools are not harmed by attendance shifts as a result of the pandemic; 
  • Providing ongoing funding for people experiencing homelessness; and 
  • Boosting ongoing investments in public health. 

The governor’s proposal also includes a number of proposals for tax breaks for businesses that are unnecessary or deserve further scrutiny. Most notably, the administration proposes to spend $3 billion over the next two years to unnecessarily pay a federal unemployment insurance loan, which amounts to a tax break that primarily benefits larger businesses and corporations. 

State leaders must also figure out how to manage the state’s constitutional spending limit — or Gann Limit — that holds the state back from building a better future that is especially critical for Californians with low incomes, people of color, immigrant Californians, and women. The administration is leaving details of how the state will manage the spending limit to the May Revision.

With the 2022-23 state budget proposals, state leaders can ensure corporations and the wealthy are not the only ones who reap the benefits of the state’s strong economy. This First Look report outlines key pieces of the 2022-23 budget proposal, and examines how the governor and the Legislature can expand upon the governor’s proposals to invest in the people who have put their own health and well-being at risk to keep our communities running and move California forward.

Contents

Budget Overview

Health

Homelessness & Housing

Economic Security

Education

Justice System

Workforce & Small Business


Budget Overview

Governor’s Budget Assumes Continued Economic Recovery, but Significant Risks

Nearly two years into the COVID-19 pandemic, the state is experiencing a continued, but uneven, economic recovery. The budget proposal notes that as of November 2021, California had added back about 70% of jobs that were lost in March and April of 2020. Low-paying industries that were hardest hit in the early days of the pandemic — such as leisure and hospitality — have been recovering more slowly than high-paying industries. The governor’s economic outlook projects that the state will regain all of the jobs lost by the end of 2022, while the hardest hit low-paying industries will not fully recover until early 2023. 

The state saw strong growth in average wages in 2021 despite the return of many low-paying jobs. The administration notes that employers have had to raise wages to attract workers in the face of lower labor force participation due to workers’ pandemic fears, child and dependent care obligations, and searches for better jobs. Wage gains are expected to continue, even after accounting for inflation, but at a lower rate as labor force participation improves and inflation slows down.

The outlook assumes that the federal infrastructure package enacted in late 2021 will provide a modest boost to jobs in the state beginning this year, but does not assume the enactment of the federal “Build Back Better” plan. Additionally, the economic outlook was finalized prior to the emergence of the COVID-19 Omicron variant so it does not account for potential economic disruptions related to Omicron or future variants, such as ongoing weak labor force participation and supply-chain delays. 

The administration also highlights other ongoing risks to the economic outlook, including the potential for a stock market drop, the effects of climate change, unaffordable living costs and increasing inequality, and changing demographics such as the aging of the population and lower fertility and migration rates.

Governor’s Proposal Reflects Strong Revenue Growth and Includes Tax Changes

Although the COVID-19 pandemic has been devastating to many Californians, the state has recently experienced unprecedented revenue growth due to factors including surging incomes among the wealthy, the booming stock market, steep growth in corporate profits, and strong retail sales. Accordingly, the administration estimates that General Fund revenues across the three-year budget window spanning 2020-21 through 2022-23 will be $28.7 billion higher than estimated in the enacted 2021-22 budget, before accounting for transfers such as to the state’s rainy day fund. 

The administration projects that total General Fund revenues before transfers will be $197.6 billion in the upcoming budget year. For the state’s three largest revenue sources, the proposal projects 2022-23 General Fund revenues of:

  • $130.3 billion in personal income taxes,
  • $32.2 billion in sales and use taxes, and
  • $23.7 billion in corporation taxes.

Additionally, the proposed budget assumes that General Fund revenues for the current 2021-22 fiscal year will total $193.8 billion — $12.2 billion higher than projected in the June budget.

The governor cautions that these revenue projections assume continued economic growth and that risk factors discussed in the Economic Outlook section could threaten the expectation of continued revenue growth.

The governor’s budget includes several proposed tax policy changes that would affect some individuals and businesses, most of which are reflected in the governor’s revenue projections.

Proposed tax changes for individuals include:

  • Improvements to the Young Child Tax Credit, as outlined in the Economic Security section, estimated to cost $74 million for the 2022 tax year.
  • Creation of a $1,000 tax credit for certain former foster youth with low incomes, as described in the Economic Security section, estimated to cost about $20 million annually. 
  • Extended income tax payment plans for low- and middle-income households, which would allow participating tax filers to make installment payments on their 2019, 2020, and 2021 taxes until the end of September 2023 without incurring penalties or interest. Eligible filers must have incomes below $75,000 for single filers or $150,000 for couples filing jointly.

Proposed tax changes for businesses include:

  • Elimination of the temporary limitation on business tax credits and net operating losses — enacted in the 2020-21 budget package — one year earlier than planned, estimated to decrease General Fund revenues by $5.5 billion in 2022-23.
  • Creation of a new temporary tax credit for companies investing in climate change mitigation technologies that are headquartered in California, costing approximately $250 million annually for three years.
  • Creation of a new temporary tax credit for companies developing green energy technologies and agreeing to share profits with the state, costing $100 million annually for three years.
  • Exemption from taxable income of federal COVID-relief grants for restaurants and venue operators provided through the American Rescue Plan. The proposal would also allow these businesses to deduct expenses related to these grants for tax purposes, Total estimated cost: Nearly $500 million over several years, including $130 million in 2021-22 and $144 million in 2022-23.

Additionally, the governor proposes pausing the inflation adjustment for gas and diesel excise taxes scheduled to go into effect in July 2022, meaning these tax rates would not change for 2022-23. This pause is estimated to reduce special fund revenues that support state and local transportation projects by $523 million in 2022-23. The governor has indicated an intention to backfill the loss of local revenues with other funds.

While some of the governor’s tax proposals would improve equity in the state by increasing support for Californians with low and middle incomes, more detail will be needed on the business tax proposals to determine whether they are appropriately structured and targeted to help struggling businesses and employees and to incentivize new investments in combating climate change rather than providing a windfall to businesses that would have made these investments anyway. These are critical questions because revenues forgone to tax breaks represent dollars that could otherwise have supported investments to improve the health, economic, and social well-being of Californians who have been hit hard by the pandemic and who were blocked from prosperity long before the pandemic — including Californians with low incomes, many Californians of color, immigrants, and LGBTQ+ Californians.

Stronger-Than-Expected Revenues Allow State to Build Reserves to $35 Billion

California has a number of state reserve accounts, some of which are established in the state’s Constitution to require deposits and restrict withdrawals, and some of which are at the discretion of state policymakers.  

California voters approved Proposition 2 in November 2014, amending the California Constitution to revise the rules for the state’s Budget Stabilization Account (BSA), commonly referred to as the rainy day fund. Prop. 2 requires an annual set-aside equal to 1.5% of estimated General Fund revenues. An additional set-aside is required when capital gains revenues in a given year exceed 8% of General Fund tax revenues. For 15 years — from 2015-16 to 2029-30 — half of these funds must be deposited into the rainy day fund and the other half is to be used to reduce certain state liabilities (also known as “budgetary debt”).

Prop. 2 sets the maximum size of the BSA at 10% of General Fund Revenues and, if the limit is reached, any dollars that otherwise would have gone into the BSA would have to be spent on infrastructure, including spending related to deferred maintenance. 

Prop. 2 also established a new state budget reserve for K-12 schools and community colleges called the Public School System Stabilization Account (PSSSA). The PSSSA requires that when certain conditions are met, the state must deposit a portion of General Fund revenues into this reserve as part of California’s Prop. 98 funding guarantee (see section on Prop. 98)

The BSA is not California’s only reserve fund. Each year, the state deposits additional funds into a “Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties” (SFEU). Additionally, the 2018-19 budget agreement created the Safety Net Reserve Fund, which holds funds that can be used to maintain benefits and services for CalWORKs and Medi-Cal participants in the event of an economic downturn. 

Stronger-than-expected revenue collections result in changes to the BSA, PSSSA, and SFEU balances for the current fiscal year (2021-22) and also affect projections for 2022-23. The administration projects:

  • A total BSA balance of $19.3 billion in 2021-22, growing to $20.9 billion in 2022-23;
  • A PSSSA balance of $6.7 billion 2021-22, growing to $9.7 billion in 2022-23; and
  • An SFEU balance of $20.5 billion in 2021-22, which partly reflects the state’s receipt of unanticipated revenues amid the pandemic, dropping to $3.1 billion for 2022-23.

The administration’s proposal for 2022-23 leaves the Safety Net Reserve at its 2021-22 level of $900 million.

The governor’s proposal estimates that the BSA “is now at its constitutional maximum (10% of General Fund revenue), resulting in a required $2.4 billion in infrastructure investments in 2022-23.”

Taking into account the BSA, PSSSA, Safety Net Reserve, and SFEU, the governor’s proposal would build state reserves to a total of $34.6 billion in 2022-23.

Gann Limit Impact on Spending Priorities Is Uncertain — Clarity Expected in May

One of the biggest unknowns in the governor’s proposed budget is how the Gann Limit will affect budget and policy choices during the 2022-23 budget cycle. The Gann Limit, also known as the State Appropriations Limit, is a constitutional spending cap approved by voters via Proposition 4 in a 1979 special election. The cap is tied to California’s 1978-79 spending level and is adjusted each year for changes in population and per capita personal income, as explained in the Budget Center’s new Gann Limit Q&A.

If the state exceeds the Gann Limit over a two-year period, the Legislature must spend the revenue over the limit in specific ways — providing half to taxpayers and the other half to K-12 schools and community colleges. State policymakers have limited options to structure budgets to avoid exceeding the limit. For example, they can spend more on things that are excluded from the limit, such as emergency response and infrastructure projects, which can include housing.

According to current estimates, the state exceeded the Gann Limit by $19 billion in 2020-21 and is expected to be under the limit by $16.4 billion in 2021-22. The difference — $2.6 billion — is the amount by which the state is currently projected to surpass the Gann Limit over these two fiscal years combined. In contrast, current estimates suggest the state will not exceed the Gann Limit across the next two-year period: 2021-22 and 2022-23. However, all of these estimates will change as new revenue, personal income, and other numbers become available.

The governor does not outline a plan for addressing the Gann Limit as part of his proposed budget. Instead, the administration plans to release “an updated calculation” of the Gann Limit as well as “proposals to address it” as part of the governor’s May Revision. It is very likely that the next set of Gann Limit estimates will show the state substantially outstripping the limit across multiple years, especially if state revenues continue to exceed projections. Under this scenario, the governor and legislative leaders would need to decide how to address the “excess” revenues in ways that are consistent with the Gann Limit’s constitutional limitations.

In addressing the Gann Limit, state leaders should prioritize investments to improve the health, economic, and social well-being of Californians who have been hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic and who were blocked from prosperity long before the pandemic — including people with low incomes, many people of color, immigrants, and LGBTQ+ Californians. For example:

  • If policymakers choose to boost spending on infrastructure — the governor and legislative leaders have already advanced proposals — they should include significant investments in housing, which (as noted above) can be counted as infrastructure for the purpose of the Gann Limit. Our state’s inadequate supply of affordable housing is perhaps the greatest challenge facing Californians with low incomes and Black and Latinx Californians.
  • If policymakers choose to provide tax refunds, these payments should be targeted to Californians with low incomes, who struggle with our state’s high cost of living, as well as to Californians who are undocumented, who are blocked from many public supports that other residents can access to meet basic needs.

Even if state policymakers are able to manage within the spending cap over the next year or two, the Gann Limit’s restrictive rules mean that many kinds of ongoing expenditures would be off the table or much harder to sustain, such as big new investments in affordable child care and health care. The Gann Limit also challenges state leaders’ ability to simply maintain current service levels, as the Budget Center explains in this Q&A. Since the spending cap is in the California Constitution, state leaders would need to ask voters to approve any changes to it. Substantially reforming or — better yet — repealing the Gann Limit would allow the state to make the bold investments needed for all Californians to share in the state’s wealth.

Health

Proposed Budget Bolsters COVID-19 Response Efforts

As the state approaches two years into the COVID-19 pandemic, a contagious variant of the virus (Omicron) continues to spread across California communities. The recent surge in cases and hospitalizations are a stark reminder that the pandemic is not yet over. Recognizing this ongoing health threat, the administration proposes additional funding to bolster vaccination and booster efforts, expand testing capacity, and support health care workers. The administration proposes a total of $2.7 billion to mitigate the spread of the virus and protect the health of Californians. Of this amount, the administration requests the legislature to include $1.4 billion in an early action package before the June budget. 

Overall, the proposed $2.7 billion COVID-19 response package includes: 

  • $1.2 billion to improve the state’s testing capacity. This funding would allow testing sites across the state to expand their hours of operation as well as their capacity. The funding would also be used to distribute antigen tests to local health departments, community clinics, and county offices of education and schools. 
  • $583 million to increase vaccination uptake among Californians. Working in partnership with ethnic media outlets and community-based organizations, the administration aims to provide information about COVID-19 vaccines and boosters. This funding would also support in-home vaccination and testing programs as well as provide free transportation to vaccination appointments. 
  • $614 million to support health care systems and frontline workers.
  • $200 million to enhance the state’s emergency response and public health capacities, including staffing and information technology for state-level operations.
  • $74 million to support services for newly arrived migrants and border communities, such as vaccinations, testing, and isolation and quarantine services.
  • $36 million to expand statewide contact tracing, which is a practice that public health workers use to identify and notify people who have been exposed to someone who has tested positive for COVID-19.

Governor Proposes Much-Needed Public Health Investments

The California Department of Public Health protects and promotes the health of all Californians through infectious disease control, chronic disease prevention, and more. Yet despite its important responsibilities, funding for this department has not kept pace with the cost of responding to ongoing and emerging health threats. Due to chronic underfunding in public health, counties and cities across the state were not adequately prepared to respond to COVID-19 and many communities suffered as a result. Most notably, communities of color experienced higher rates of illness and death due to historic and ongoing structural racism that deny many communities the opportunity to be healthy and thrive. The intersection of the pandemic and structural racism has underscored the need to address the root cause of health disparities. 

The governor’s proposed budget includes the following public health investments:

  • $235.2 million for disease surveillance readiness and maintenance of IT operations at the state level. Specifically, this funding is for the Department of Public Health to maintain and operate technology and data platforms and applications in 2022-23, both for the ongoing COVID-19 response and for future disease outbreaks.
  • $200 million ongoing General Fund for public health infrastructure at the local level. Under this proposal, local health jurisdictions would receive a minimum base allocation of $350,000 to support workforce expansion, data collection and integration, and partnerships with health care delivery systems and community-based organizations.
  • $100 million General Fund annually for public health infrastructure at the state level. This funding would establish a new Office of Policy and Planning to assess current and emerging public health threats. It would also support other core functions, such as emergency preparedness, the public health workforce, and public health communications. 
  • $55 million for opioid overdose prevention and surveillance. This funding would also improve the Department of Public Health’s ability to collect and analyze data on drug overdoses. 
  • $50 million ongoing General Fund to expand home visiting services and the California Black Infant Health Program, both of which aim to improve maternal and child health outcomes.

This funding would provide much-needed support for public health infrastructure and health promotion programs. Ensuring that counties and cities have the resources needed to overcome COVID-19 and other health threats is vital to address this pandemic and future public health needs. 

However, state leaders can do more to advance health equity. Given that structural racism continues to have a profound impact on the health and well-being of many communities across the state, the governor’s administration and other state leaders can employ a variety of strategies to combat the effects of historical and ongoing racist policies and practices. Such strategies include declaring racism a public health crisis at the state level and establishing dedicated funding to support community-based organizations, clinics, and tribal organizations in their efforts to advance health equity.

Governor Calls for Expanding Medi-Cal to All Undocumented Immigrants

Building on the federal Affordable Care Act (ACA), California has substantially expanded access to health coverage in recent years. For example, more than 14 million Californians with modest incomes — nearly half of whom are Latinx — receive free or low-cost health care through Medi-Cal (California’s Medicaid program), several million more than before the ACA took effect. Another 1.4 million Californians receive federal subsidies to reduce the cost of coverage purchased through Covered California, our state’s health insurance marketplace. Nonetheless, many Californians — including immigrants who are undocumented — remain uninsured, while those with health coverage often face high monthly premiums and excessive out-of-pocket costs, such as copays and deductibles, when they seek health care services.

The governor’s proposed budget:

  • Expands — no sooner than January 2024 — Medi-Cal eligibility to undocumented immigrants ages 26 to 49, the last group excluded from coverage. In recent years, California has expanded eligibility for comprehensive Medi-Cal coverage to certain immigrants who qualify for the program except for their immigration status. This includes children and young adults up to age 25 as well as adults age 50 and older. However, undocumented adults ages 26 to 49 continue to be excluded from Medi-Cal coverage even though they otherwise qualify. The governor proposes to close this eligibility gap by extending full-scope coverage to these adults no sooner than January 1, 2024. This expansion is estimated to cost $819.3 million ($613.5 million General Fund) in 2023-24, rising to $2.7 billion ($2.2 billion General Fund) at full implementation. These figures include the cost of providing In-Home Supportive Services to newly eligible adults who are anticipated to enroll in the program.
  • Reduces the premiums that many Californians pay for Medi-Cal coverage. These are Medi-Cal enrollees whose incomes are “marginally above” the cut-off for no-cost Medi-Cal and who therefore must pay a monthly premium to access Medi-Cal services. The governor proposes to reduce these premiums for around 500,000 Medi-Cal enrollees, a group that includes pregnant women, children, and working people with disabilities. The proposed budget includes $53.2 million ($18.9 million General Fund) to implement this proposal in 2022-23, rising to $89 million ($31 million General Fund) annually thereafter.
  • Calls for creating “equity payments” for Medi-Cal providers. The governor includes one-time funding of $400 million ($200 million General Fund) for equity payments in the Medi-Cal program. These payments are intended to promote patient-centered models of care, advance equity, and improve quality in children’s preventive care, maternity care, and integrated behavioral health care, according to the governor’s budget summary.
  • Includes several proposals to maintain and improve availability of reproductive health care services. These proposals include reducing administrative barriers to medication abortion services; adding the human papillomavirus vaccine as a covered benefit under the Family PACT program, effective July 1, 2022; providing one-time funding of $20 million General Fund for scholarships and loan repayments to help boost the number of reproductive health care services providers; and providing one-time funding of $20 million to help reproductive health care facilities improve their security.
  • Rescinds the decade-old 10% Medi-Cal payment reductions for eight categories of providers. These eight categories are: nurses of all types, alternative birthing centers, audiologists and hearing aid dispensers, respiratory care providers, select durable medical equipment providers, chronic dialysis clinics, non-emergency medical transportation providers, and emergency medical air transportation providers. The proposed budget includes $20.2 million ($9 million General Fund) in 2022-23 and $24 million ($10.7 million General Fund) annually thereafter to eliminate the 10% rate cut for these providers. The state rescinded this reduction for other categories of providers in prior years.
  • Continues to envision the establishment of an Office of Health Care Affordability. The 2021-22 budget included funding for this new office, but legislation to establish it did not pass last year. This office would be charged with addressing health care cost drivers and improving affordability of health coverage.

Proposed Budget Sets in Motion Robust Medi-Cal Reform Initiatives

This year the administration is moving forward with implementing the ambitious Medi-Cal reform effort known as CalAIM (California Advancing and Innovating Medi-Cal) that was originally introduced in 2019. In late 2021, California received the federal authority needed to implement these reforms through the approval of the CalAIM Section 1115 demonstration and CalAIM Section 1915(b) waivers. The initiatives outlined build on previous pilot programs targeted to coordinate physical health, behavioral health, and social services in a patient-centered manner with the goal of improving health and well-being through Medi-Cal. CalAIM also aims to improve quality outcomes, reduce health disparities, reduce complexity across all delivery systems, and implement value-based initiatives and payment reform. 

The main goal of these changes is to better support millions of Californians enrolled in Medi-Cal — particularly those experiencing or at-risk of homelessness, children with complex medical conditions, children and youth in foster care, Californians involved with the justice system, and older adults — who often have to navigate multiple complex delivery systems to receive health-related services. 

The proposed budget allocates $1.2 billion ($435.5 million General Fund) in 2021-22, $2.8 billion ($982.6 million General Fund) in 2022-23, $2.4 billion ($876.4 million General Fund) in 2023-24, and $1.6 billion ($500 million General Fund) in 2024-25 for CalAIM reforms. Key initiatives added this year focus on justice-involved Californians, including:

  • $50 million total funds ($16 million General Fund) in 2022-23 to implement CalAIM justice-related initiatives, and an additional $561 million over five years for related capacity building efforts. This funding supports resources and capacity efforts that will help implement mandated pre-release Medi-Cal application processes in county jails and youth correctional facilities. It also supports the coordination of targeted medical, behavioral health, social service, and reentry services for qualifying people who are incarcerated prior to their release. 
  • $1.3 billion total funds over five years for the development of Enhanced Care Management (ECM) and Community Supports in CalAIM through the Providing Access and Transforming Health (PATH) initiative. PATH provides funding for capacity building to community-based organizations, counties, and other local providers as the implementation of Enhanced Care Management and Community Supports begins. These efforts also support effective pre-release care for justice-involved populations, particularly through the expansion of ECM, to close the gap for Whole Person Care pilot programs that are currently serving previously incarcerated Californians with complex needs.

Other CalAIM initiatives that are set to begin in 2022-23 include:

  • The development of a Foster Care Model of Care to support the complex medical and behavioral health needs of foster youth. 
  • Mandatory managed care enrollment for eligible beneficiaries that qualify for both Medi-Cal and Medicare.
  • Required long-term care coverage by all managed care plans.

Proposed Budget Includes Funding to Launch Behavioral Health Initiatives

Behavioral health services — mental health care and/or treatment for substance use — are primarily provided by California’s 58 counties, with funding from the state and federal governments. Even before the pandemic, millions of Californians were coping with mental health conditions or substance use disorders and too many also confronted challenges in accessing care. As a result of the pandemic and economic recession, many Californians experienced stress, grief, isolation, depression, and other hardships. Long after businesses and schools reopen and economic recovery progresses, the work to support Californians’ mental health and well-being will be far from over.

The administration recognizes the toll on health and well-being that COVID-19 has taken, particularly on children and youth. This year, the administration proposes funding for the Children and Youth Behavioral Health Initiative, which aims to transform California’s behavioral health system for all children and youth in California. The administration’s budget proposal includes the following in 2022-23 as part of the Children and Youth Behavioral Health Initiative: 

  • $450 million General Fund for school behavioral health partnerships and capacity to increase the number of students receiving behavioral health services in school settings.
  • $429 million General Fund for evidence-based behavioral health practices
  • $230 million General Fund for the Behavioral Health Services and Supports Platform and related e-Consult service and provider training.
  • $87 million ($41 million General Fund) to implement dyadic services effective January 1, 2023. Dyadic behavioral health visits are provided for the child and caregiver or parent at medical visits and are intended to provide screening for behavioral health conditions and referrals for appropriate follow-up care.

The proposed budget also includes:

  • $1.5 billion General Fund ($1 billion in 2022-23 and $500 million in 2023-24) for behavioral health bridge housing to support people experiencing homelessness and serious behavioral health conditions. The funding would be used to purchase and install tiny homes and provide operational supports in bridge housing settings. See the Homelessness and Housing section for more information. 
  • $135.1 million ($67.6 million Mental Health Services Fund and $67.5 million federal funds) to extend Medi-Cal provider training to treat and prevent Adverse Childhood Experiences, which are defined as traumatic events that occur before age 18. This funding would be available over a three-year period.
  • $108 million ($16 million General Fund) to increase access to community-based mobile crisis intervention services through a new mandatory Medi-Cal benefit as soon as January 1, 2023. The benefit would be implemented through county behavioral health delivery systems by mobile crisis teams in the community. Under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, this benefit qualifies for 85 percent federal funding.
  • $96 million General Fund to expand the medication assistance treatment program. Medication-assisted treatment is the use of medications as well as counseling and behavioral therapies to provide a “whole-patient” approach to treating substance use disorders.
  • $93 million General Fund in 2021-22 and $571 million General Fund ongoing to support early stabilization and community care coordination as well as the expansion of diversion and community-based restoration capacity for individuals who have been determined by a court to be incompetent to stand trial.
  • $86 million one-time opioid settlement funds for opioid prevention and treatment. Of this amount, $50 million would be used for a public awareness campaign targeted towards youth on opioids and fentanyl risk, $26 million would be used for provider training on opioid treatment, $5 million would be dedicated to opioid surveillance, and $5 million would be used to distribute naloxone to homeless service providers. 
  • $7.5 million General Fund ($6 million ongoing) to improve emergency response for individuals experiencing a mental health crisis. This funding would be used to implement the national suicide and mental health crisis phone number (988) and system.

These investments in our behavioral health system are critical, especially now. The governor’s proposal to transform the behavioral health system for children and youth would increase access to prevention and early intervention services. Expanding access to behavioral health services helps Californians thrive and it can also reduce hospitalization or even incarceration due to behavioral health conditions.

Homelessness & Housing

Governor’s Proposals Focus on Encampments and Behavioral Health Needs

Everyone needs a safe place to live as the most basic foundation for health and well-being. Yet more than 161,000 Californians were experiencing homelessness at the last point-in-time count. Homelessness has devastating effects on individuals’ physical health and mental health and creates serious barriers to maintaining a job or participating in other aspects of community. There are also deep inequities in who experiences homelessness in California, with Black, American Indian, and Pacific Islander Californians disproportionately affected, as well as LGBTQ+ individuals.

The 2021-22 state budget included approximately $12 billion to address homelessness over the 2021-22 and 2022-23 fiscal years. The governor’s current budget proposal adds another $2 billion over two years. New proposals focus on two areas:

  • $500 million one-time General Fund to address homeless encampments, specifically “for jurisdictions to invest in short- and long-term rehousing strategies for people experiencing homelessness in encampments.” More details about allowed uses of these funds will be important for understanding whether these efforts would effectively and respectfully address the housing and support service needs of Californians living in encampments.
  • $1.5 billion General Fund over two years for immediate housing and treatment services for unhoused individuals with serious behavioral health issues. These funds would be administered through the Department of Health Care Services’ Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program, and would address immediate needs through interim housing such as tiny homes or other bridge housing settings such as assisted living facilities (see the Behavioral Health section). While some interim housing is needed within the homeless services system to meet urgent housing needs, the most effective approach to addressing homelessness among individuals with serious mental health needs combines supportive services with permanent housing, which can include leased units as well as deed-restricted units.

Homelessness intersects with many other issues and systems, and the governor’s budget proposal includes items in various other areas that aim to prevent homelessness or address the needs of specific subpopulations of unhoused individuals, particularly individuals with serious behavioral health issues and individuals exiting incarceration. These proposals include:

  • Adding mobile mental health and substance use crisis services as a new Medi-Cal benefit (see the Behavioral Health section).
  • Providing transitional reentry housing for adults leaving state prisons who are at risk of being unhoused, by continuing the Returning Home Well Program (see the State Corrections section).
  • Connecting adults leaving incarceration with Medi-Cal health coverage and encouraging “warm hand-offs” to behavioral health services, to reduce the risk of poor outcomes including homelessness, as part of CalAIM (see the CalAIM section).
  • Coordinating health care with behavioral health and social services for Medi-Cal participants, through the Enhanced Care Management and Community Supports components of CalAIM (see the CalAIM section).
  • Increasing state capacity to serve individuals with serious mental health issues determined incompetent to stand trial (IST) (see the Behavioral Health section).

Governor Proposes $2 Billion in New One-Time Resources to Increase Affordable Housing

Safe and stable housing is a fundamental basic need, but many Californians struggle to maintain stable housing because of unaffordable housing costs. Renters, people with low incomes, Black and Latinx Californians, and Californians who are undocumented are especially likely to pay an unaffordable amount for housing. As of December 2021, about 1 in 5 California adult renters with household incomes below $50,000 reported being behind on rent payments.

The governor’s budget proposal includes $1.5 billion one-time General Fund to boost funding in several programs that support affordable housing development and preservation, with a focus on infill locations near jobs, schools, and other amenities in order to also address climate and equity goals. These investments include:

  • $500 million for the Infill Infrastructure Grant program ($225 million in 2022-23 and $275 million in 2023-24) administered by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
  • $300 million for the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities program ($75 million in 2022-23 and $225 million in 2023-24) for infill and compact development that reduces greenhouse gas emissions. These funds are proposed in addition to the annual cap and trade auction funds that support this program, projected at $314 million for 2022-23.
  • $100 million for affordable housing development and adaptive reuse on excess state land ($25 million in 2022-23 and $75 million in 2023-24).
  • $100 million for per-unit adaptive reuse incentive grants ($50 million in 2022-23 and $50 million in 2023-24) to be paired with other state housing funds to remove barriers to converting sites to residential use, prioritizing sites in downtown locations.
  • $200 million for loans to develop mixed-income rental housing ($50 million in 2022-23 and $150 million in 2023-24), through the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA). 
  • $200 million for the Portfolio Reinvestment Program to preserve at-risk affordable housing in downtown areas ($50 million in 2022-23 and $150 million in 2023-24), administered by HCD.
  • $100 million for the Mobilehome Park Rehabilitation and Resident Ownership Program ($25 million in 2022-23 and $75 million in 2023-24), administered by HCD, to preserve and develop affordable mobilehome parks.

The proposed budget also allocates an additional $500 million for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), continuing the annual boost to the LIHTC allocation for the fourth year running. Following through on a commitment from 2021-22, the budget also includes $750 million one-time General Fund for public colleges and universities to develop or acquire housing for low-income students, as the second installment of a total proposed $2 billion over three years.

In addition to these funding proposals, the governor proposes to help local governments meet state mandated housing and climate goals by working “in partnership with local governments… to identify land across California that is well situated for diverse, new downtown-oriented housing types.” This process is expected to identify sites that would be eligible for state infill development funding and streamlining opportunities.

Not included in the governor’s proposal is any funding for emergency rental assistance for struggling renters, despite the fact that requests for help from California’s COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program now total more than the $5.2 billion in federal funds initially provided to the state. California may receive some additional federal funding for this purpose, but if federal funds do not close the gap, many renters with low incomes will risk losing their housing.

Economic Security

Administration Proposes Ending Work Requirement for Young Child Tax Credit

California’s Young Child Tax Credit provides up to $1,000 annually to help families with low incomes and young children pay for basic needs, such as food and diapers. More than 8 in 10 people who are eligible to benefit from this tax credit are people of color, and nearly 6 in 10 are women. Last year, this credit provided an average of $931 to over 420,000 families. To qualify for the credit, families must have annual earnings between $1 and $30,000 and at least one child age 5 or younger. Families who do not have work earnings are excluded from the credit.

The administration proposes ending the work requirement for the Young Child Tax Credit, allowing families with no annual work earnings to qualify for a $1,000 credit as long as they meet other eligibility rules. Budget documents state that “young children living in households with no earned income are just as deserving of being protected from poverty as are children living in households with low income.” This proposal is projected to cost $55 million annually, implying that they expect 55,000 families to newly qualify for the credit.

Work requirements have a long racist and sexist history in the United States and contribute to racial and gender inequities in who lives in poverty. By removing a racist and sexist barrier to the Young Child Tax Credit, this proposal will increase equitable access to one of California’s most critical cash supports for families with children.

This proposal would likely make California the first state to end the work requirement for a state child tax credit. Federal policymakers temporarily ended the work requirement for the federal Child Tax Credit last year, but the Senate has been unable to secure enough votes to approve legislation that the House passed last fall that would end the work requirement permanently.

Governor Newsom also proposes annually adjusting the Young Child Tax Credit for inflation so that it keeps up with rising prices starting in the 2022 tax year. The credit has not been adjusted for inflation since it was created in 2019, and without annual inflation adjustments, it will lose value over time, helping families less each year. California’s other refundable tax credit, the California’s Earned Income Tax Credit (CalEITC), has been adjusted for inflation each year since it was created in 2015. The administration estimates that this proposal will cost $19 million for the 2022 tax year. 

Administration Proposes Creating Tax Credit for Former Foster Youth

The proposed budget includes a new refundable tax credit for former foster youth modeled after the Young Child Tax Credit. Specifically, this credit would provide a $1,000 credit to young adults ages 18 to 25 who were in the foster care system at some point at age 13 or older and would otherwise qualify for California’s Earned Income Tax Credit (CalEITC). The administration estimates that this new credit will cost $20 million annually, implying that they expect it to benefit 20,000 young adults each year.

This proposal would reduce poverty among current and former foster youth, increasing their long-term financial health, according to John Burton Advocates for Youth. Transition-age foster youth experience high rates of poverty due to high unemployment and low annual earnings. A Santa Clara County pilot program that provided free tax assistance to current and former foster youth showed how refundable tax credits, like the CalEITC, are important tools for boosting the incomes of transition-age youth, helping them to maintain housing, stay in school, and pay for basic needs like food. 

The Proposed Budget Makes No Improvements to the CalEITC

California’s Earned Income Tax Credit (CalEITC) is a refundable state tax credit that helps millions of families and individuals with low earnings from work pay for basic needs, such as food. The administration does not include any proposals to strengthen or expand the CalEITC.

Advocates for the CalEITC would like California to increase the size of the credit for workers without dependents in their home, who comprise more than 7 in 10 CalEITC recipients. Nearly half of these individuals receive less than $100 from the CalEITC and many do not qualify for the federal EITC despite their low earnings.

Governor’s Proposals Expand Support for Immigrants

California has the largest share of immigrant residents of any state and is home to an estimated 2 million to 3.1 million individuals who are undocumented. Half of all California workers are immigrants or children of immigrants. About 1 in 4 of these immigrant workers are employed in an industry highly affected by the COVID-19 economic shutdown. Among California’s undocumented workers, approximately 1 in 3 are employed in an industry highly affected by the COVID-19 economic shutdown, according to Budget Center estimates.

The governor’s proposal builds on important supports provided to immigrants in the 2021-22 budget. Specifically the 2022-23 proposed budget:

  • Expands comprehensive Medi-Cal coverage to all undocumented Californians starting no sooner than January 2024. In recent years, California has expanded eligibility for comprehensive Medi-Cal coverage to undocumented immigrants up to age 25 who otherwise qualify for the program. The 2021 budget made adults age 50 and older eligible for Medi-Cal coverage starting May 2022. The governor’s budget proposes to expand comprehensive Medi-Cal coverage to undocumented adults ages 26 to 49 starting no sooner than January 1, 2024. The expansion in the proposed budget is estimated to cost $819.3 million ($613.5 million General Fund) in 2023-24, rising to $2.7 billion ($2.2 billion General Fund) at full implementation, including In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) costs. (See Coverage, Affordability, and Access section.)
  • Ends the exclusion of undocumented adults, age 55 and older, from food assistance program. Administrative estimates show an additional $40 million General Fund in 2022-23 to continue the expansion of the state-funded basic nutrition assistance through the California Food Assistance Program (CFAP) to undocumented adults over the age of 55. CFAP provides state-funded food assistance to “qualified” immigrants who are not eligible for CalFresh, California’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). While the proposal extends CFAP to adults over the age of 55, it pares back the framework for broader CFAP expansion in the current year (2021-22) budget. (see Food Assistance section.) 
  • Provides funding to support newly arrived migrants and communities near the California and Mexico border. $74 million one-time General Fund is set aside for the California Department of Public Health for “humanitarian efforts,” including sheltering, testing, vaccines, and support services for newly arrived migrants.
  • Invests in immigrant workforce development programs. The proposal includes $30 million to expand the English Language Learner pilots in the Integrated Education and Training Programs, $20 million for the Employment Training Panel to expand workplace literacy training, and $10 million to expand earn-and-learn community change career pathways for community college students, including immigrant students.
  • Supports undocumented students at California Community Colleges. The governor’s proposal allocates $20 million one-time Proposition 98 for emergency financial assistance to eligible AB 540 students.

The governor’s budget proposal misses an opportunity to extend temporary economic support through additional stimulus payments to Californians who are undocumented and have been excluded from most support programs, including standard unemployment insurance as well as expanded COVID-19 federal relief. In the 2021-22 budget, the governor included initial resources and committed to expanding CFAP to “individuals regardless of immigration status”. The administration’s proposal to expand this support to adults age 55 and older is an important step, but falls short of ensuring all Californians have access to food assistance. More than half of children in undocumented immigrant families live in poverty. Policymakers can end this xenophobic and racist exclusion of immigrants from a crucial support they need to avoid hunger. Prioritizing the urgent needs of undocumented immigrants and their families is an important opportunity for California’s policymakers to make our support systems more equitably inclusive, to make our state’s economy more resilient, and to lead in this time where the state has the resources.

Proposed Budget Continues CalWORKs Investments But Falls Short on Grants

The California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program provides modest cash assistance for children from low-income households while helping parents overcome barriers to employment and find jobs. Even before the COVID-19 crisis, CalWORKs primarily served children of color, who faced higher rates of economic insecurity than did white children. As millions of California workers – especially workers of color – lost their jobs or saw reduced wages due to a long-term public health emergency and recession, CalWORKs is a particularly critical source of support.

The governor’s proposed budget:

  • Increases the maximum CalWORKs grant but does not lift all CalWORKs children out of deep poverty. Monthly CalWORKs grants are adjusted according to the number of people in the household who are eligible for CalWORKs. At least one family member is ineligible for cash assistance in about 55% of CalWORKs cases because they have exceeded the 48-month time limit (extended to 60 months in 2020-21), have not met work requirements, or due to their immigration status. After over a decade of inadequate grants, state policymakers in recent years have raised the maximum CalWORKs grant above the deep poverty threshold (50% of the federal poverty line) for many children in CalWORKs. However, these prior increases left children who share resources with ineligible family members living in deep poverty. Even as the administration proposes a 7.1% increase to the maximum grant (with an estimated cost of $200.7 million in 2022-23), the proposed budget continues to keep these children well below the deep poverty threshold.

The proposed budget also makes changes to child support collections for former CalWORKs families (see Child Savings Accounts and Child Support section).

Budget Proposal Implements Child Savings Accounts and Boosts Child Support Pass-Through

The 2021-22 budget included nearly $2 billion in one-time funds to establish college savings accounts for public school students in grades 1-12 who are defined as low-income under the state’s K-12 Local Control Funding Formula, with larger investments for foster youth and students experiencing homelessness. This CalKIDS program (California Kids Investment and Development Savings Program) is administered through the ScholarShare Investment Board. The governor’s proposed budget begins the ongoing implementation of this plan, allocating $170 million ongoing General Fund to add savings accounts for incoming first-grade cohorts of students, while adding $5 million one-time and $5.2 million ongoing General Fund to support outreach and implementation costs. The existing CalKIDS program also establishes college savings accounts for all California newborns.

The proposed budget also redirects more collected child support to former CalWORKs parents. When one CalWORKs parent has primary custody of a child, the non-custodial parent must provide child support payments. For formerly assisted families, outstanding child support debt that is collected does not go to the families but rather goes to the state, county, and federal governments as “reimbursement” for the costs associated with the CalWORKs program. The administration now proposes to allow former CalWORKs families to receive the money themselves. Under this change, these families will receive an estimated annual total pass through of $187 million. State leaders should build on this change to end racist policies that block Black, Latinx, and other families from economic security by also passing through 100% of child support payments to current CalWORKs and Medi-Cal recipients and ending the state’s collection of interest on child support debt.

Budget Proposal Pares Back Plan to Provide Food Assistance to Immigrants

The governor’s budget proposal includes a number of provisions to combat food insecurity in California. This includes $50 million one-time General Fund for the CalFood program, which provides emergency resources for food banks. Food banks have been a critical resource to curb food hardship during the pandemic

Additionally, administrative estimates show $40 million General Fund in 2022-23 to continue the expansion of the state-funded basic nutrition assistance through the California Food Assistance Program (CFAP). The 2021-22 budget agreement included initial resources to expand CFAP to undocumented Californians who are excluded from the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as CalFresh in California. However, the budget proposal would limit this expansion to just undocumented Californians who are age 55 or older. More than half of children in undocumented immigrant families live in poverty. Completing this expansion to include Californians of all ages who face food insecurity, regardless of immigration status, is necessary to truly dismantle racist and xenophobic barriers and to address gaps in federal aid. 

Finally, in order to maintain the governor’s pledge to support the caregiving economy, the final budget agreement should boost state support for child care providers offering free meals to children and families through the federal Child and Adult Care Food Program. Currently, state law includes racist and sexist pay penalties that offer less state support per meal to child care providers — overwhelming women and disproportionately women of color — than to public schools.

Governor Assumes a 24% Increase to State SSP Grants in 2024

Supplemental Security Income/State Supplementary Payment (SSI/SSP) grants help well over 1 million low-income seniors and people with disabilities to pay for housing and other necessities. Grants are provided to individuals and couples and are funded with both federal (SSI) and state (SSP) dollars. State policymakers made deep cuts to the SSP portion of these grants in 2009 and 2011 to help close budget shortfalls caused by the Great Recession. Except for a small increase provided in 2017, the recession-era cuts to SSP grants remained in effect for more than a decade.

State leaders changed course last year and adopted a substantial (24%) increase to SSP grants that took effect on January 1, 2022. The maximum monthly SSP grant for individuals jumped from $160.72 to $199.21. For couples, the maximum monthly SSP grant rose from $407.14 to $504.64. Also as part of the 2021-22 budget package, state leaders committed to providing an additional increase to SSP grants in January 2024, subject to funding being provided in the 2023-24 state budget.

The governor:

  • Does not call for an increase to the state’s portion of SSI/SSP grants in 2022-23. Even with the 24% increase to SSP grants that took effect on January 1, the maximum SSP payment for individuals — $199.21 — falls far short of the level it would have reached — more than $360 — if state leaders had consistently adjusted this grant for annual changes in the cost of living since 2008, according to Budget Center calculations. In other words, grants have not kept pace with the cost of living in California due to state policy choices. Nonetheless, under the governor’s proposed budget, the state’s SSP portion of SSI/SSP grants would remain frozen throughout the upcoming 2022-23 fiscal year.
  • Assumes the state’s SSP portion of SSI/SSP grants will increase by an additional 24% in 2023-24, as envisioned in the 2021-22 budget package. As noted above, state leaders committed — as part of the 2021-22 budget package — to providing an additional SSP grant increase during the 2023-24 fiscal year. Under the governor’s assumption of a 24% increase, the maximum SSP grant for individuals would rise from $199.21 to about $247 on January 1, 2024. For couples, the maximum monthly SSP grant would increase from $504.64 to nearly $626. The administration estimates a half-year cost of $296 million General Fund in 2023-24, rising to a full-year cost of $593 million in 2024-25.

Proposal Funds New Child Care Spaces With Federal COVID-19 Relief Dollars

The governor’s proposed budget uses federal COVID-relief dollars to increase the number of subsidized child care spaces across the state. Since the beginning of the pandemic, California has received more than $5 billion in one-time federal COVID-relief dollars specifically for child care meant to stabilize children, working parents, and providers during pandemic. The administration proposes to use $823.7 million dollars — roughly one-third of the remaining relief funds — for 36,000 additional child care spaces. 

Other child care investments in the proposed budget include:

  • $35.6 million for support programs. This includes $25 million for the California Child Care Initiative Project to increase licensed family child care capacity for infants and toddlers in areas without providers and $10.6 million for the California Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation program.
  • $7.9 million for early care and education data systems. This includes $4.8 million General Fund for the initial design of a child care data system, as well as $3.1 million federal funds to support early childhood data initiatives.

COVID-19 and its consequences are far from over, yet the budget proposal fails to maintain policy changes implemented in the past year to support families and providers during the pandemic, such as waiving family fees for working parents and supporting providers when the virus impacts attendance or forces sites to temporarily close. 

Finally, state and federal leaders have never provided enough funding to provide subsidized child care for all children in eligible families or to pay providers offering subsidized care fair and just rates for this critical work. President Biden’s Build Back Better plan proposes significant new investments to expand subsidized child care, but the ability of Congress to pass this piece of legislation is uncertain. In order to stabilize the subsidized child care system during the current crisis, ensure continuity of care for families, and support the caregiving economy, state leaders will need to commit to additional, ongoing funding in the 2022-23 fiscal year and beyond.

Education

Proposed Early Learning Plan Continues Implementation of Transitional Kindergarten

The 2021-22 budget agreement included a multi-year plan to expand the state’s existing transitional kindergarten program (TK) to all four-year-olds in the state. TK is a two-year kindergarten program offered at local educational agencies (LEA) to children turning five between September 2 and December 2 of each year. The proposed budget includes more than $1 billion for the second year of the multi-year plan, including:

  • $639.2 million General Fund to expand TK to younger children. Specifically, the eligibility window would extend to all children turning five between September 2 and February 2 — instead of December 2 — a two-month extension. The General Fund dollars would be shifted to the Proposition 98 guarantee, permanently increasing funding for TK-12 schools and community colleges, while restricting General Fund spending by the same amount for other priorities.
  • $383 million Prop. 98 to add additional staff to TK classrooms. Current student-to-teacher staffing ratios in the TK program do not reflect research-based ratios for high-quality preschool programs. Hiring additional staff will more closely align staffing ratios with the California State Preschool Program (CSPP) — offered at LEAs and community-based organizations for children from families with low and moderate incomes — but still does not align with high-quality benchmarks. 

The governor’s budget proposal also makes significant changes to the CSPP. First, the budget proposal would require state preschool providers to ensure that at least 10% of children in their care have a disability. Second, providers would be required to offer additional supportive services for children who are dual language learners. To offset these costs, the proposal provides an additional $308.4 million ($197.8 million Prop. 98 and $110.6 million General Fund) to increase payment rates for providers providing care to children with disabilities and children who are dual language learners. The budget also includes $500 million one-time Prop. 98 for the Inclusive Early Educational Expansion Program, which provides funds to local education agencies to build or modify facilities. Finally, the proposed budget would change eligibility rules, so that providers could enroll two-year-olds, if all older children are served. In addition, once a family is determined to be eligible, the 12-month eligibility period would be extended to 24 months. Children with disabilities will be categorically eligible for the CSPP.

Increased Revenues Boost the Minimum Funding Level for K-14 Education

Approved by voters in 1988, Proposition 98 constitutionally guarantees a minimum level of annual funding for K-12 schools, community colleges, and the state preschool program. The governor’s proposed budget assumes a 2022-23 Prop. 98 funding level of $102 billion for K-14 education, $8.2 billion above the 2021-22 funding level of $93.7 billion estimated in the 2021-22 budget agreement. The Prop. 98 guarantee tends to reflect changes in state General Fund revenues and estimates of 2020-21 and 2021-22 General Fund revenue in the proposed budget are higher than those in the 2021-22 budget agreement. The governor’s budget proposal assumes a 2021-22 Prop. 98 funding level of $99.1 billion, $5.3 billion above the level assumed in the 2021-22 budget agreement, and a $95.9 billion 2020-21 Prop. 98 funding level, $2.5 billion above the level assumed in the 2021-22 budget package. Following an agreement in the 2021-22 budget package, the 2022-23 budget proposal would increase the percentage of General Fund revenues guaranteed for the Prop. 98 guarantee in so-called “Test 1” years from 38.02% to approximately 38.4% to accommodate enrollment increases due to the expansion of transitional kindergarten. This “rebenching” of the Prop. 98 guarantee would increase the Prop. 98 minimum funding level by $639.2 million in 2022-23, reflecting the addition of an estimated 56,000 transitional kindergarten students. 

Based on projections in the governor’s budget, the state is required to deposit $9.7 billion into the Public School System Stabilization Account (PSSSA) – the state budget reserve for K-12 schools and community colleges – $3.1 billion in 2020-21, $3.6 billion in 2021-22, and $3.1 billion in 2022-23 (see Reserves section). Because the PSSSA balance is projected to exceed 3% of the total K-12 share of the Prop. 98 minimum funding level in 2021-22, current law would prevent K-12 school districts from maintaining more than 10% of their budgets in local reserves beginning in 2022-23.

Significant Funding Boost Proposed to Expand Learning Opportunities for Students

The largest share of Prop. 98 funding goes to California’s school districts, charter schools, and county offices of education (COEs), which provide instruction to roughly 6 million students in grades kindergarten through 12. The governor’s proposed budget significantly increases ongoing funding for the Expanded Learning Opportunities Program and the state’s K-12 education funding formula – the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) – and one-time funding for several programs such as school transportation. Specifically, the governor’s proposed budget:

  • Increases ongoing funding for the Expanded Learning Opportunities Program (ELOP) by $3.4 billion. The 2021-22 budget agreement provided $1.8 billion in initial funding for the ELOP to provide additional learning time for students before or after school, as well as outside of the traditional school year, and allocated higher per pupil amounts for school districts, charter schools, and COEs with concentrated poverty above 80%. In addition to increasing ongoing funding for the ELOP, the governor’s budget proposes $937.4 million in one-time funding to integrate arts and music enrichment opportunities into the ELOP as well as to support the acquisition of infrastructure and equipment. 
  • Increases LCFF funding by approximately $3.3 billion. The LCFF provides school districts, charter schools, and COEs a base grant per student, adjusted to reflect the number of students at various grade levels, as well as additional grants for the costs of educating English learners, students from low-income families, and foster youth. The governor’s proposal provides $2.1 billion to fund a 5.33% cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for the LCFF. Because many school districts are experiencing reductions in average daily attendance (ADA) and LCFF base grants are calculated based on ADA, the governor also proposes to change “the LCFF calculation to consider the greater of a school district’s current year, prior year, or the average of three prior years’ ADA.” The administration estimates $1.2 billion in ongoing costs to make this change. According to the Assembly Budget Committee, total LCFF funding would reach $70.5 billion in 2022-23.
  • Provides $1.5 billion in one-time funding to support career pathway programs. The governor’s proposal would provide these dollars over four years to support programs focused on technology, health care, education, and climate-related fields. The governor’s proposal notes that “these programs are predicated on developing local partnerships” that include school systems, higher education institutions, and employers.
  • Provides $1.5 billion in one-time funding for school transportation. The governor’s proposal would provide these dollars over three years to mitigate the environmental impact of school bus fleets. The governor’s proposal would prioritize funding for small and rural school districts, charter schools, and COEs and those with high-concentrations of English learners, foster youth, and students from low-income families. 
  • Provides $1.3 billion in one-time non-Prop. 98 General Fund for K-12 school facilities. Because the administration expects Prop. 51 bond funding will be exhausted in 2022-23, the proposed spending plan provides this funding in 2022-23 and also proposes $925 million in one-time General Fund spending in 2023-24 to support new construction and modernization projects through the School Facilities Program. 
  • Provides more than $1 billion to expand school nutrition programs. The governor’s proposal provides $596 million to fund a requirement included in the 2021 budget agreement that all public schools provide two free meals per day to any student regardless of income eligibility in 2022-23. The governor’s proposal requires all schools eligible for a federal provision to fund universal free meals – the “Community Eligibility Provision” – to apply for that funding in order to maximize reimbursement by the federal government and then commits the state to pay for any unreimbursed costs. The governor also proposes $450 million in one-time funding over three years for kitchen infrastructure and equipment and $30 million in one-time non-Prop. 98 General Fund dollars over two years to expand farm to school demonstration projects.
  • Provides $700 million in one-time funding to create an early literacy initiative. The governor’s proposals would provide $500 million over five years in grants for literacy coaches and reading specialists in “high-needs schools” to assist struggling readers and $200 million to establish a grant program to create or expand multi-lingual libraries. 
  • Increases ongoing funding for special education by $500 million. The governor’s proposal includes several changes to the special education funding formula such as calculating base funding allocations at the local educational agency (LEA) level rather than the special education local plan area (SELPA) level and allocating mental health funds to LEAs rather than SELPAs. 
  • Provides $500 million in one-time funding to expand “dual enrollment.” Dual enrollment allows high school students to take college-level courses that count for high school graduation and college credit. The governor’s proposal would provide these dollars over four years to increase student access to “dual enrollment opportunities that are also coupled with student advising and support services.”
  • Provides $295 million to fund COLAs for non-LCFF programs. The governor’s proposed budget funds a 5.33% COLA for several categorical programs that remain outside of the LCFF, including special education, child nutrition, and American Indian Education Centers.

Proposal Misses Opportunity to Provide More Direct Support to CCC Students

A portion of Proposition 98 funding provides support for California Community Colleges (CCC), the largest postsecondary education system in the country, which serves high percentages of students of color and students with low incomes. CCCs prepare approximately 1.8 million students to transfer to four-year institutions or to obtain training and employment skills. 

The proposed budget includes $325 million Proposition 98 to support the CCC’s goals of expanding opportunities for students to transfer to four-year institutions, complete a degree in a timely manner, and to better align the system with the state’s workforce needs as part of their “multi-year roadmap.” Notable investments include:  

  • $105 million one-time to support the implementation of a common course numbering system across all community colleges. 
  • $100 million ongoing for students that are now eligible for the Student Success Completion Grant as part of the Cal Grant expansion (see Student Aid section for further details). 
  • $65 million one-time for colleges to implement legislation that ensures that students are placed on a transfer pathway for their intended major. 

Moreover, the budget proposes to continue supporting CCC’s efforts to increase enrollment and retention rates (CCCs have seen a significant decrease in enrollment from pre-pandemic levels), provide emergency financial assistance to some students who are undocumented, and provide funding for deferred facility maintenance. 

Specifically, the proposed spending plan: 

  • Provides $409.4 million ongoing for a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for apportionments. The proposal represents a 5.33% cost-of-living adjustment (COLA). 
  • Includes $387.6 one-time for deferred maintenance. These funds are intended to make progress in clearing a backlog of more than $600 million in deferred maintenance and also support energy efficiency projects. 
  • Provides $200 million ongoing to expand healthcare coverage for part-time faculty. This proposal expands the Part-Time Faculty Health Insurance Program to allow community college districts to expand coverage. 
  • Allocates $150 million in one-time funds to support student retention and enrollment efforts. This investment is intended to continue to fund strategies to increase retention and enrollment rates — the 2021-22 enacted budget provided $120 million one-time for the same purposes. 
  • Includes $130 million one-time over three years to support vocational pathways in healthcare for English language learners. $30 million is for 2022-23, $50 million is for 2023-24, and $50 million is for 2024-25. 
  • Allocates $20 million one-time for emergency financial assistance grants for AB 540 students. Under California law AB 540, certain students classified as nonresident (including students who are undocumented) are exempt from paying nonresident tuition. This proposal includes eligibility requirements that are still unclear. 

The proposed budget misses an opportunity to provide additional direct support to students at the community colleges. The pandemic has had severe impacts on community college students — particularly for students with low-incomes and students of color — which is evidenced in the large declines in enrollment from pre-pandemic levels. Additionally, the administration’s failure to enact Cal Grant reform (see Student Aid section) means that additional investments are necessary to support student needs at the community colleges.

Proposed Budget Provides Multi-Year Investments in the CSU and the UC

California supports two public four-year higher education institutions: the California State University (CSU) and the University of California (UC). The CSU provides undergraduate and graduate education to roughly 477,000 students on 23 campuses, and the UC provides undergraduate, graduate, and professional education to about 290,000 students on 10 campuses.

For the CSU, the administration proposes a multi-year budget through 2026-27 focused on increasing enrollment, raising graduation rates and closing graduation gaps, increasing affordability of on-campus housing, and halving the cost of instructional materials by 2025. These investments include:

  • $304.1 million ongoing General Fund, including $211.1 million for a 5% increase in operating costs, $81 million to increase undergraduate enrollment for California residents, and $12 million to support foster youth.

For the UC, the administration also proposes a multi-year budget through 2026-27 focused on increasing enrollment, raising graduation rates and closing graduation gaps, reducing the cost of instructional materials, and achieving debt-free education by 2030. These investments include:

  • $304.1 million ongoing General Fund, including $200.5 million for a 5% increase in operating costs, $98.8 million to increase undergraduate enrollment for California residents and to offset revenue losses from replacing out-of-state students with in-state students, and $6 million to support foster youth.

Proposed Budget Invests in Cal Grants and Middle Class Scholarship

Cal Grants are the foundation of California’s financial aid program for students with low and middle incomes pursuing higher education in the state. Cal Grants provide aid for tuition and living expenses that do not have to be paid back. The budget summary estimates that over 500,000 financial aid grants will be awarded to students in the 2022-23 academic year. 

In order to support California’s higher education students and increase college affordability, the proposed budget includes:

  • $515 million additional ongoing General Fund for the Middle Class Scholarship. This program supports students at the University of California (UC) and at California State University (CSU), including students who are pursuing a teaching credential. Additional funding targets reducing students’ total cost of attendance.
  • $300 million one-time General Fund for the Learning-Aligned Employment program. This program, established in the 2021-22 budget, funds UC, CSU, and California Community College (CCC) students to partner with external employers to promote career development and professional networking opportunities for students, prioritizing students from underrepresented communities, with a particular focus for STEM fields.
  • $100 million additional ongoing Proposition 98 for the Cal Grant entitlement program. The 2021 Budget Act eliminated the age and time out of high school requirements from the Cal Grant entitlement program that have barred many CCC students from receiving an award. This funding is expected to support an estimated 170,000 awards to newly eligible CCC students in the 2022-2023 academic year.
  • $20 million one-time Proposition 98 for emergency financial assistance to support eligible AB 540 students, including undocumented students at CCCs.

The governor can continue to support students with low and middle incomes by pursuing reforms to Cal Grant that streamline and eliminate remaining barriers that prevent more students from accessing state financial aid. In addition, more investments are needed to adequately address non-tuition costs. Ensuring Californians have access and resources to attend and thrive in the state’s higher education institutions broadens opportunities for individuals and families and strengthens our state’s workforce to drive long-term economic growth.

Justice System

Governor Does Not Propose to Close Additional State Prisons

More than 99,500 adults who have been convicted of a felony offense are serving their sentences at the state level, down from a peak of 173,600 in 2007. American Indian, Black, and Latinx Californians are disproportionately represented in state prisons — a racial disparity that reflects implicit bias in the justice system, structural disadvantages faced by these communities, and other factors. Among all incarcerated adults, most — 94,674 — are housed in state prisons designed to hold fewer than 82,000 people. This level of overcrowding is equal to 116% of the prison system’s “design capacity,” which is below the prison population cap — 137.5% of design capacity — established by a 2009 federal court order. California also houses over 4,800 people in facilities that are not subject to the cap, including fire camps, in-state “contract beds,” and community-based facilities that provide rehabilitative services. The sizable drop in incarceration has resulted both from 1) a series of justice system reforms enacted by voters and state leaders and 2) changes adopted in 2020 to further reduce prison overcrowding in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as suspending intakes from county jails and implementing early releases.

The proposed budget:

  • Does not call for the closure of additional state prisons. California recently closed the state prison in Tracy and was on track to shut down the Susanville prison by the end of June 2022 until litigation filed by the city of Susanville halted the process. In the meantime, the governor does not propose to target more prisons for closure even though the Legislative Analyst’s Office estimates that California could close as many as five prisons over the next several years. Closing additional prisons, particularly those with costly, decaying infrastructure, would not only generate substantial state savings but also continue to reduce our state’s overreliance on incarceration, which is not necessary to make neighborhoods and communities safer.
  • Anticipates that the prison population will temporarily rise before resuming its long-term decline by 2024-25. The prison population is estimated to increase by about 8,300 by 2022-23, primarily because the state has been transferring people to prison who were temporarily being held in county jails in order to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmissions in the state prison system. However, current estimates also suggest that the prison population will soon resume its long-term decline, falling to roughly 100,400 by 2024-25.
  • Expands access to substance use treatment in prisons. The governor proposes to expand the Integrated Substance Use Disorder Treatment Program, which was implemented in 2020 to deliver treatment and interventions to incarcerated adults with substance use disorders. This expansion would be funded with $126.6 million General Fund in 2022-23, rising to $162.5 million ongoing.
  • Proposes to continue providing emergency housing services to adults who are at risk of being unhoused when they leave prison. The Returning Home Well Program, which was created in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, would continue for another three years at a cost of $10.6 million General Fund annually. These resources would “support continuation of the program while also providing the opportunity to assess the ongoing needs of the release population,” according to the governor’s budget summary.
  • Increases incarcerated adults’ access to higher education through a partnership with the California State University. Bachelor’s Degree Programs would be created at seven prisons for an initial cost of $5 million General Fund and an ongoing cost of $4.7 million. These programs would be available to incarcerated adults who successfully complete their prison-based community college program.

Proposed Infrastructure Increases to Courts and Juvenile Facilities

All California counties play a key role in the state’s local correctional system by operating jails and supervising adults and juveniles on probation. While many counties have continued to follow COVID-19 emergency guidelines, including through temporarily lowering bail schedules and reducing the number of people held in custody, county jails still house roughly 59,000 adults on a given day. Since 2011, state-to-county “realignment” made counties responsible for managing certain adults who had traditionally been housed in state prisons and supervised by state parole officers upon their release. Recently, juvenile justice realignment also transferred responsibility for youth who are wards of the state to counties. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) will no longer house juveniles, with limited exceptions, and is scheduled to close on June 30, 2023. The local correctional system is also accompanied by California’s 58 county-based trial courts that supplement the foundation of the state’s judicial branch – ruling on both civil and criminal cases. 

This year the administration proposed focusing on continuing efforts to support current programs and funding additional infrastructure projects, including:

  • $263 million ($135.8 million General Fund and $127.2 million Public Buildings Construction Fund) for the acquisition or building of five courthouses. These will be located in the counties of Fresno, Solano, Los Angeles, Plumas, and San Luis Obispo
  • $100 million one-time General Fund for the Board of State and Community Corrections to improve county-operated juvenile facilities. These funds are intended for facilities to build their capacity to support youth with a variety of needs, focusing on trauma-informed care, restorative justice, and rehabilitative programming. 
  • $50 million ongoing General Fund to backfill an estimated loss of revenue to trial courts from expanding the ongoing fines and fees reduction pilot program. Newly proposed statutory budget language would qualify court-imposed civil assessments for this program and reduce them from a maximum of $300 to $150. Civil assessment fees are placed on individuals charged with traffic, misdemeanor, or felony charges who fail to appear in court or pay a fine. 
  • $42.6 million General Fund in 2022-23 and $42.3 million ongoing for 23 superior court judgeships, which fill all remaining judgeship vacancies allowed under current law.
  • $34.7 million General Fund in 2022-23 and $40.3 million in 2025-26 ongoing to continue the modernization of court operations through various technological initiatives sparked by the pandemic.

Governor’s Proposed Crime Reduction Plan Lacks Equity Considerations

Over the years, California has adopted various justice system-related reforms that moved away from “tough on crime” sentencing laws while still ensuring public safety. These reforms, passed through legislative action and voter approval, have led to sustained decreases in overall crime and prison population rates. Yet despite the relatively low and stable crime rates California has experienced, the administration introduced “cracking down on crime” proposals this year targeted at retail theft and other crimes that do not explicitly account for the potential enforcement disparities that may arise. Structural racism and its compounding factors still lead to the overpolicing of communities of color, racial profiling, sentencing disparities, and racial disparties in the state’s prison population which the proposed funding allocations fail to recognize.

The governor’s proposed budget allocates $356 million General Fund over three years, including $132 million in 2022-23, for various law enforcement efforts to address retail theft and provide some relief to small businesses. The proposal for this funding does not state how equity implications and implicit biases will be taken into consideration during enforcement and training. The major funding allocations include: 

  • $85 million annually through 2024-25 in competitive grants for local law enforcement to increase enforcement, task force participation, staffing presence at retail locations, diversion and supervision of people accused of committing retail theft, and retail theft training. 
  • $20 million one-time General Fund for grants to small businesses affected by retail theft. 
  • $10 million annually through 2024-25 for competitive grants to local District Attorneys to establish retail theft prosecution teams.
  • $6 million in 2022-23 to provide a total of $15 million annually for the California Highway Patrol to permanently expand their Organized Retail Theft Task Force.

The governor also proposed additional public safety-related funding, such as:

  • $25 million one-time General Fund to create a competitive grant program to boost local gun buyback programs and provide awareness about gun and youth violence.
  • $20 million one-time General Fund to expand the California Military Department’s existing drug interdiction support efforts in federally designated High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas.  

Workforce & Small Business

Proposed Budget Includes Several Investments Targeted to Small Businesses

In addition to the business tax proposals outlined in the Revenues section — which do not appear to be exclusively targeted to small businesses — the governor proposes investments of additional state dollars and the allocation of federal funds to help small businesses recover from the pandemic and to support entrepreneurs and startups.

The proposed budget includes:

  • $130 million in additional one-time General Fund dollars for the Small Business COVID-19 Relief Grant Program. This program was launched in December 2020 and demand continues to exceed capacity. These new funds would be added to $20 million in unallocated funds from the set-aside for nonprofit cultural institutions, so a total of $150 million would be available to businesses that have applied for but not yet received grants.
  • $40 million in one-time General Fund dollars to waive filing fees for new businesses registering between July 2022 and June 2023.
  • $20 million in General Fund dollars over four years to expand the Innovation Hub (iHub) program with a focus on inclusive economic growth. The iHub program was relaunched as part of the 2021 budget package, which included $2.5 million one-time General Fund to provide grants for the establishment of 10 regional iHubs — partnerships between research institutions, economic development organizations, business or workforce organizations, venture capital networks, and local governments — to support entrepreneurs and startups in the science and technology sectors. The additional funding would expand the number of iHubs to 13 and provide grants of up to $100,000 for five new businesses incubated at each iHub. The administration states that these grants would encourage science and technology business creation in underserved areas.
  • $20 million in one-time General Fund dollars for grants to small businesses that have experienced retail theft to assist them in repairing or replacing infrastructure.
  • $6 million in General Fund dollars in 2022-23 and $23 million ongoing for the Technical Assistance Expansion Program. This program was established in the 2018 budget agreement to provide grants to small business technical assistance centers to expand consulting and training services to more underserved business groups, including businesses owned by women, people of color, and veterans and those serving low-wealth, rural, and disaster-impacted communities. The initial funding commitment of $17 million annually over five years will expire in 2022-23, and the governor proposes to increase the funding level to $23 million in 2022-23 and to permanently support the program at that level.

The budget proposal also indicates that of the $1.2 billion in federal State Small Business Credit Initiative funds the state is expected to receive through the American Rescue Plan, it plans to allocate $1 billion to existing programs administered by the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (IBank) and the State Treasurer’s office to increase small businesses’ access to financing. The governor proposes allocating the remaining $200 million to establish a Venture Capital program at IBank to focus on underrepresented venture capital managers and business owners, socioeconomically disadvantaged areas of the state, and climate equity.

Many of the administration’s small business proposals indicate a focus on underrepresented business groups and underserved communities, which could contribute to a more equitable state economy if these businesses and communities are prioritized and the programs help to break down structural barriers faced by entrepreneurs and small business owners who are people of color, women, people from disadvantaged communities and other “historically underserved” groups.

Workforce Proposals Primarily Target Climate Change and the Care Economy

To help workers struggling to secure jobs or shift industries, and to create pathways to jobs in various sectors, the governor’s proposed budget includes a number of investments focused on workforce development. 

Several of these investments are also aimed at supporting the state’s efforts to combat the climate crisis and the ongoing transition to clean energies, including: 

  • $265 million to support the transition from oil and gas to other industries. The proposal includes $200 million over two years for the Department of Conservation to seal oil and gas wells, $50 million for a pilot fund intended to support displaced oil and gas workers, and $15 million for a well-capping workforce pilot to train displaced oil and gas workers.
  • $235 million for training programs and grants across various climate-related industries. The budget proposes $110 million over three years for a Goods Movements Training Center,  $60 million over three years for the Low Carbon Economy Workforce grant program, $35 million one-time for the University of California to establish climate-focused regional training hubs, and $30 million one-time over two years for community colleges to support workforce development in wildfire and forest resilience. 

Other investments task state agencies — the Labor and Workforce Development Agency and the California Health and Human Services Agency — with coordinating workforce development investments in the care economy and health-related fields. Major proposals include: 

  • $350 million for new community health workers. These funds are intended to support recruitment, training, and certification for 25,000 community health workers by 2025. 
  • $340 million for high road training partnerships in “family-sustaining” health care jobs. This proposal focuses on training and career development for people with “barriers to employment” through collaboration among various entities. 
  • $270 million to increase the number of nurses and other health professions. 
  • $210 million to support social worker pipelines. The funds are intended to support training programs and provide financial assistance in the form of scholarships and stipends. 
  •  

The budget proposal also includes several investments to support the educator workforce, including: 

  • $46 million one-time General Fund to increase the number of teachers. $36 million are intended for waiving certain teacher examination and credentialing fees and $10 million to provide grants to higher education institutions to implement teacher preparation programs that integrate a bachelor’s degree and a teacher credential in one pathway. 

Additional workforce development proposals include $50 million one-time to support English learners with language literacy and other skills used in the workplace.

Administration Proposes Unnecessary Payment on Federal Unemployment Insurance Loan

Millions of California workers turned to unemployment insurance benefits in 2020 and 2021, after suddenly losing their jobs as COVID-19 moved through homes and communities. These benefits helped Californians pay for basic needs, such as food and rent, while they could not work. 

California had to borrow billions of dollars from the federal government to pay for the unemployment benefits workers needed in 2020 and 2021. This was largely because, for decades, California had not required businesses – particularly large, profitable corporations – to cover the true cost of state unemployment benefits for their workers.

California businesses finance unemployment benefits for their workers by paying annual payroll taxes. These taxes generate revenues that are deposited into the state’s unemployment insurance fund and are available to pay benefits whenever workers lose their jobs through no fault of their own. In California, employer payroll taxes are based on only the first $7,000 of each employee’s annual pay. This is the lowest “taxable wage base” allowed under federal law, and just four states have bases this low.

California’s base has been frozen at just $7,000 since 1983 even though wages have increased substantially since then. As a result, businesses currently pay payroll taxes on just 12% of the average California worker’s earnings – the smallest share in the nation. This severely limits the amount of revenue California can generate for unemployment benefits and is a key reason the state had to borrow money from the federal government to pay for these benefits over the past two years. The taxable wage bases in 16 states are at least half of average annual earnings, and most of these states paid for unemployment benefits during the pandemic without federal loans.

The administration proposes using $3 billion General Fund over two years ($1 billion in 2022-23 and $2 billion in 2023-24) to pay down a portion of the state’s outstanding federal loans for unemployment benefits.

This proposal amounts to an unnecessary business tax break that would take $3 billion away from addressing Californians’ urgent needs at a time when families and communities are still reeling from a nearly two-year-long pandemic and are now grappling with the economic and health impacts of another COVID-19 surge. Specifically, this proposal:

  • Would essentially provide an across-the-board tax break for businesses that haven’t been paying enough in taxes to cover the true cost of unemployment benefits for their workers for decades. It would especially benefit large businesses, including profitable corporations, which are paying less than half the amount in state taxes, as a share of their income, than they did a generation ago largely due state policymakers’ decision to provide tax cuts and other breaks.
  • Is unnecessary because there is already a sensible process in place for paying off the state’s unemployment debt. Under federal law, California businesses will pay off this debt very gradually through small increases in the federal payroll tax rate. It makes sense that businesses are responsible for paying off this debt since it largely resulted from decades of employers not paying enough in taxes to support the unemployment benefits their workers need. Businesses’ first payment toward the debt will be due in 2023 and will amount to just $21 per employee for the entire year, the equivalent of a 0.07% of a full-time minimum wage worker’s annual earnings. The federal payroll tax will increase in each subsequent year, resulting in businesses paying an additional $21 per employee per year until the debt is paid off.
  • Will not benefit any California business for many years. The Legislative Analyst’s Office analyzed a similar proposal included in the governor’s revised budget last May and estimated that the earliest businesses would have benefited was in 2030, well after the economic effects of the pandemic on businesses are likely to have subsided.

The governor indicated that one rationale for this proposal is to reduce how much small businesses will pay in increased federal payroll taxes in future years. But the benefits of the proposal would primarily benefit larger businesses and corporations years from now. If the administration wants to provide short-term assistance to small businesses – particularly those struggling to stay afloat amid the pandemic – there are better alternatives that could provide aid directly to those businesses this year.

The administration also includes $470.1 million one-time General Fund to pay the forecasted interest payment on the federal loans the state took out to pay for unemployment benefits that are due in September 2022. Interest payments on these loans are traditionally paid for out of the state’s General Fund.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Statement on Governor Newsom’s Proposed 2022-23 Budget

The California Budget & Policy Center, a nonpartisan, research and analysis nonprofit committed to advancing public policies that improve the lives of Californians, released the following statement from Executive Director Chris Hoene following the release of Governor Newsom’s proposed 2022-23 state budget.