Skip to content

Every Californian deserves quality education, health care, well-paying jobs, and the resources to build a secure future — and sustained public investment is how we get there. Recent experience shows that such investments are possible with voter-approved, progressive reforms that strengthen and expand California’s revenue base.

In 2012, California voters asked the state’s highest earners — the top 2% of Californians — to contribute a little more and use that money to invest in the services California’s communities need.

Proposition 30, approved by voters in 2012, temporarily raised income tax rates on just the top 2% of Californians. Four years later, voters chose to keep those rates in place through 2030 by passing Prop. 55. These tax rates have generated significant state revenue, securing investments in education and other important services.

Since its initial enactment, this measure has generated more than $104 billion. In the last couple of years alone, the higher rates have generated around $9 to $10 billion per year. These revenues now represent a core component of the state budget, supporting school programs and other vital services.

key impact

The tax rate on the top 2% of Californians generates $9 to $10 billion per year, supporting investments in education, tax credits for Californians with low incomes, and strengthening the state’s finances.

What investments did the additional revenue secure?

California has used Prop 30/55 revenues to increase investments in education, increase access to health care, expand tax credits to Californians with low incomes, and strengthen state reserves, among other investments. The rate increases, along with a rising economy, made it possible for the state to increase education spending. During this period, the state implemented a major school finance reform and launched other initiatives such as the Universal Meals Program.

Beyond the classroom, the voter-approved tax on the state’s highest earners helped policymakers expand California’s Earned Income Tax Credit, improve access to health care through the Medi-Cal program, and establish new retirement saving options for private-sector employees.

Additionally, the additional revenues contributed to larger deposits into the state’s rainy day fund and payments to reduce state debts, moves that protected public services during times of economic downturns and lower-than-expected state revenues.

What’s next?

The top tax rates are set to expire in 2030, and voters will likely have an opportunity in November 2026 to renew this top tax rate to ensure the investments Californians make in schools, health care, and support for working families can continue.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Every Californian deserves affordable housing, health care, child care, well-paying jobs, and the resources to build a secure future — and sustained public investment is how we get there. Recent experience shows that such investments are possible with progressive reforms that strengthen California’s tax base, even when federal leaders push for the opposite.

In 2019, state leaders passed a budget that cleverly conformed to — adopted as part of state tax law — select provisions of the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), signed by President Trump in 2017. This federal tax package primarily slashed taxes for the wealthy and corporations, while cutting vital funding for food assistance and health care. California smartly chose to conform to only certain provisions that limited tax breaks for high-income households and businesses, thereby taking a step toward making the state’s tax system more fair and raising well over $1 billion in new, ongoing revenue each year.

key impact

Over $1 billion in new ongoing annual revenue, boosting K-14 education and expanding tax credits for working families

What Investments Did the Changes Make Possible?

This new revenue boosted funding for K-14 education and funded a significant ongoing investment in state refundable tax credits. Specifically, this new revenue allowed state leaders to fund the largest expansion of California’s Earned Income Tax Credit (the CalEITC) and the creation of the Young Child Tax Credit, both of which continue to provide hundreds or even thousands of dollars in tax refunds to families and individuals with very low incomes each year, helping them better meet basic needs.

CalEITC Expansion

The largest-ever expansion of the California Earned Income Tax Credit, putting hundreds to thousands of dollars back in the pockets of working families with the lowest incomes.

Young Child Tax Credit

A refundable tax credit, made possible by federal conformity, was created to provide direct financial support to families with young children and their futures.

How Did California Do It?

When the Republican-controlled Congress passed major federal tax legislation in 2017 — a package that largely benefited corporations and high-income households — California did not conform wholesale to federal law. Instead, state leaders, in collaboration with tax experts and advocates, carefully reviewed the changes and selectively adopted the provisions that scaled back tax breaks for wealthy households and corporations. Since these groups received generous federal tax giveaways, including tax rate cuts, many likely saw an overall decrease in taxes when considering both federal and state taxes.

By choosing which federal changes to incorporate into state law, California generated substantial new revenue without raising tax rates — making the tax system fairer while investing in communities.

What’s Next?

On the heels of another round of massive federal tax cuts for large corporations and the wealthy, state leaders should consider how they can recapture some of those revenues to sustain investments in health care, child care, affordable housing, and other assistance Californians need.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

What’s the difference between income and wealth? Taxes for individuals and corporations in California? Tax credits and deductions? Corporate revenues and corporate profits? Understanding these key terms is critical to navigating the state budget and its intersection with California’s tax and revenue system to generate ongoing resources and provide quality education, affordable health care, child care, housing, and other services for communities.

Key Terms

Tax Justice Explained

Read our 5 Facts: California’s Tax and Revenue System Isn’t Fair for All to understand how elements of California’s tax and revenue system further or impede the goals of economic and racial equity for households, communities, and the state.

Read our Report: Why Aren’t Large Corporations Paying Their Fair Share of Taxes? to see how far corporate taxes have fallen as a share of corporate profits in California and reasons for the decline.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Communities across California face many challenges during President Trump’s second administration, from deep federal budget cuts that threaten to undermine Californians’ health, economic security, and well-being, to mounting affordability pressures and persistent inflation that have exacerbated communities’ longstanding unmet need for more affordable housing, health care, and child care. People with low incomes, immigrants, communities of color, and other marginalized Californians are bearing the brunt of these challenges, as harmful and discriminatory federal policies compound existing inequities based on race and wealth.

State leaders have an opportunity to chart a different path for California, and they have both the responsibility and the ability to respond. This report shows that:

  1. Policymakers have the tools to better meet Californians’ needs and the evidence to prove it. Recent progress — from improvements in health coverage, to gains in affordable housing and declines in homelessness, to increased child care enrollment and lower child poverty — shows that when the state invests in people’s essential needs, quality of life improves.
  2. Progress is now under threat from federal cuts and policy rollbacks. Federal cuts are targeting the very programs that have improved Californians’ lives, hitting the most vulnerable communities hardest and widening existing inequities.
  3. Policymakers have the resources and revenue solutions to fight back. California has the fourth-largest economy in the world and is home to a large share of the nation’s wealthy as well as some of the largest, most profitable corporations, all of which benefit from the state’s public services and infrastructure. Yet California loses billions of dollars each year due to tax breaks and loopholes that benefit corporations and the wealthy — resources that could be better spent meeting the needs of California families.
Portrait of child girl eating on snack time at school

H.R. 1 and the Federal Budget

H.R. 1, the harmful Republican mega bill passed in July 2025, will deeply harm Californians by cutting funding for essential programs like health care, food assistance, and education.

See how California leaders can respond and protect vital supports.

Tax Revenue Funds the Public Investments That Improve Californians’ Lives

Every Californian deserves affordable housing, health care, and child care, well-paying jobs, and the resources to build a secure future — and public investment is how we get there. Recent experience shows that when policymakers invest in meeting people’s essential needs, Californians’ quality of life improves. In recent years:

California’s uninsured rate fell to a historic low following investments to expand access to health coverage

In 2014, California fully implemented federal health care reform, which, along with more recent state initiatives to expand full-scope Medi-Cal to all income-eligible Californians regardless of immigration status, helped the state reach a historically low uninsured rate of 5.9% in 2024.

A teacher helps students during a coding lesson at Sutton Middle School.

case Study: How a Tax on Wealthy Households Funds Schools, Health Care & More

Voters asked the top 2% of earners to contribute more — generating $9 to $10 billion per year for education, tax credits for families with low incomes, and a stronger, more resilient state budget.

Expanding Medi-Cal to undocumented children led to significant improvements in their health

Undocumented children in California became eligible for full-scope Medi-Cal in 2016, and coverage was fully expanded to cover all income-eligible Californians in 2024. Research shows that after the expansion to undocumented children took effect, the percentage of non-citizen children who reported being in excellent health increased by 10 percentage points from 20% to 30%, suggesting that investing in health coverage for all contributed to significant improvements in people’s health.

More Californians are exiting homelessness — thanks to public investments

This is in large part due to significant state investments in the Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) program, which allows communities across California to fund solutions tailored to their local needs. In 2024 alone, homeless service providers assisted over 330,000 Californians experiencing homelessness. HHAP has helped drive a 24% decline in youth homelessness since 2019 and supported more than 90,000 Californians in moving into permanent housing since 2023. These and other state homelessness investments have led to a statewide 9% drop in unsheltered homelessness in 2025.

California has doubled the production of new affordable homes in recent years

According to the California Housing Partnership, California produced more than 17,900 units in 2024. This increase was largely driven by major state investments in various affordable housing programs between 2019 and 2023, which helped thousands of developments pencil out and open their doors. More homes are still needed — but the gains are spreading, with more counties becoming affordable for California households with middle and lower incomes.

Enrollment in publicly funded child care has steadily increased following the partial expansion of subsidized child care spaces

In 2021, the Newsom administration promised to expand affordable child care to more than 200,000 children. Around 60% of that promise has been fulfilled: the share of eligible children enrolled in publicly funded child care grew from 11% in 2022 to 16% in 2024. That means thousands more children are getting the care that supports their healthy development and thousands more families have the economic security to thrive.

California’s child poverty rate dropped by 40% in one year following the significant temporary expansion of the federal Child Tax Credit

In 2021, the federal Child Tax Credit was increased and made fully refundable, allowing millions of families with very low incomes to access the full credit for the first time. This expansion drove a 40% drop in California’s child poverty rate and was associated with reductions in food insecurity and racial income inequities. This demonstrates that poverty is a policy choice and that a significant expansion of California’s own tax credits could have a widespread impact for families and individuals experiencing poverty.

Family in a store checking the fruits measuring weight

case Study: Clever Strategy Allowed California to Raise New Revenue Following Federal Tax Cuts

In 2019, California selectively conformed to parts of the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted during President Trump’s first term, and raised over $1 billion in new, ongoing annual revenue — boosting K-14 education and expanding tax credits for working families.

Critical Needs Remain For Californians

Despite recent progress, much more public investment is needed — even before accounting for the growing harm of federal funding cuts. For example:

Yet recent and projected budget shortfalls make clear that California’s tax system isn’t generating enough resources even to maintain recent progress — let alone build on it. And now, deep federal funding cuts and other harmful actions are upending California’s progress toward a more equitable future.

Federal Cuts Are Threatening California’s Hard-Won Progress

The progress California has made didn’t happen by accident — it took sustained public investment. Now federal cuts are targeting the very programs that made that progress possible, and the communities bearing the greatest burden are those that were already struggling most.

If state leaders fail to raise additional revenue and expand public investments, here’s what’s at risk for California families:

Up to 2 million Californians may lose their Medi-Cal coverage

Federal cuts to health care could cause up to 2 million Californians with low and modest incomes, who are disproportionately Latinx and other Californians of color, to lose their Medi-Cal coverage. While this will impact all Californians, immigrants’ access to care is specifically restricted, including the elimination of health insurance coverage for many immigrants, such as refugees, asylees, and trafficking survivors. This is estimated to leave 200,000 Californians without crucial health insurance they need to survive. Recent state action to restrict coverage for immigrants will add to the harm by reversing progress made towards providing health care for all.

As people lose health insurance, clinics and hospitals — especially in rural areas — will face additional financial strain, leading to overcrowded clinics, fewer options for care in local communities, and higher premiums, among other ripple effects that will impact the entire health care system. Proposed additional state cuts to health care access for immigrants would further exacerbate the harm by causing even more Californians to lose coverage.

Over 3 million California households are at risk of losing some of all food assistance

Federal cuts to food assistance could put more than 3 million households with very low incomes, disproportionately Black, Latinx, and other people of color, at risk of losing some or all assistance. The harshest cuts target some of the most marginalized state residents, including refugees, asylees, and other humanitarian immigrants, as well as former foster youth, veterans, and people experiencing homelessness. Without state action to offset the cuts, food insecurity and poverty will rise, and an entire ecosystem of jobs and businesses connected to the food economy will be damaged.

At least 75,000 Californians could fall into homelessness

Federal threats to housing and homelessness programs, combined with inadequate state support, could undermine California’s progress in reducing homelessness and supporting housing stability for Californians with the lowest incomes, a large share of whom are older adults and people with disabilities. Harmful changes to federal Continuum of Care funding are expected, and current federal appropriations still fall short of covering nearly 15,000 California families with an Emergency Housing Voucher — putting homelessness services and households who have already secured housing at risk of falling back into homelessness. At the same time, a proposed federal rule targeting mixed-status households could put roughly 7,190 California families at risk of losing HUD-assisted housing, most of which include children, and impose new red-tape on more than 820,000 U.S. citizens in California. Proposed cuts to HHAP and the failure to provide new General Fund investments in affordable housing add to these challenges.

State Leaders Have Common-Sense Options to Raise Revenues and Protect Californians From Federal Harm

The choices state leaders make will determine who bears the burden and who benefits from H.R. 1. Maintaining the status quo means choosing to protect tax breaks for corporations and the wealthy at the expense of everyone else. Without bold action, people with low incomes, immigrants, communities of color, and other marginalized Californians will be left to bear the full brunt of federal cuts. California has commonsense options to minimize the harm, including:

Closing the “water’s edge” loophole, the most costly state corporate tax break

The “water’s edge” loophole allows global corporations that shift US profits to tax havens to avoid $3 to $4 billion in state taxes each year, at the expense of everyday people. This tax break rewards large profitable corporations that engage in aggressive tax planning by making it appear they are less profitable in the US and in California than they actually are — something small domestic businesses and individuals working for a living cannot do.

Putting reasonable limits on corporate tax credits and deductions

Reasonable caps on corporate tax credits and deductions would ensure corporations cannot use them to reduce their tax bill to the mere state $800 minimum tax. Policymakers can continue the temporary limit on business tax credits put in place by the 2024-25 budget agreement — which capped the use of credits to $5 million per business each year from 2024 through 2026 — and reverse course on the provision allowing businesses to claim refunds for the credits that exceeded the cap after the temporary limit expires. These refunds are estimated to cost the state $6.8 billion across fiscal years 2026-27 and 2034-35, a time when millions of Californians will be dealing with the harms of the federal budget cuts and the state will be ill-positioned to protect Californians without substantially raising revenue.

Ensuring that wealthy individuals inheriting valuable assets don’t escape taxation

This can be done by eliminating the state’s “basis step-up” tax break so that people inheriting assets pay tax on the full increase in value of those assets when they sell them and reinstating an estate or inheritance tax on large estates or inheritances. Most California estates go untaxed due to California’s lack of a state-level estate or inheritance tax and the overly generous exemption from the federal estate tax, which allows wealthy families to pass up to $30 million to their heirs tax-free ($15 million per individual). The basis step-up tax break is estimated to cost the state around $5 billion each year — although revenue gains from repealing it would start small and accrue over time. The potential revenue from enacting an estate or inheritance tax — which would have to be approved by state voters — would depend on the design, but by one estimate could raise between about $900 million and $3.6 billion, depending on the size of estates that would be subject to the tax.

The Path Forward: Equitable Revenue, Public Investment, and a California Where Everyone Thrives

Strengthening California’s revenue base is long overdue — and now, as the federal government abandons its responsibility to support the health and well-being of all Americans, it is more urgent than ever. California can and must chart a different course. By ensuring the most profitable corporations and wealthiest Californians pay their fair share, state leaders can generate the resources needed to protect communities from federal harm, build on hard-won progress, and move toward a California where everyone can thrive.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Millions of Californians are struggling to make ends meet and the affordability crisis continues to drive up the cost of basic necessities like groceries and rent. Simultaneously, the 2025 Republican megabill — H.R.1 — is further straining the budgets of low-income households, by making unprecedented cuts to health care and food assistance, and giving out over a trillion dollars worth of tax breaks to the already wealthy and corporations.

The California Earned Income Tax Credit, the Young Child Tax Credit, and the Foster Youth Tax Credit help millions of Californians afford basic necessities, yet California spends much less on these vital programs than on tax expenditures for profitable corporations.

Specifically, under Governor Gavin Newsom’s budget proposal, the state is estimated to spend almost six times more on tax breaks for corporations than on state tax credits for low-income Californians during the 2026-27 fiscal year.

Expanding refundable tax credits and closing corporate tax breaks are common sense policies as the federal safety net is being weakened and corporations are showered with new federal handouts. Policymakers can support Californians in combating the state’s affordability challenges by closing the “water’s edge” loophole and placing reasonable limits on corporate tax credits and deductions so that no profitable corporation pays next to nothing in corporate taxes.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

key takeaway

Large profitable corporations in California have several strategies to avoid paying more than the minimum $800 state tax, costing the state billions in lost revenue each year. State leaders can take steps to reduce corporate tax breaks to better invest in the health and well-being of all Californians.

At a time when many Californians struggle with the state’s affordability challenges and millions will be harmed by the impacts of the deep federal cuts to health care and food assistance enacted by H.R. 1, the 2025 Republican megabill, highly profitable corporations continue to benefit from generous tax breaks at the state and federal levels. These corporations benefit from California’s skilled workforce, public infrastructure, and strong consumer base — all made possible by public investments supported by tax revenues. Yet some of these corporations pay next to nothing in corporate taxes in California, largely due to overly generous state tax breaks.

Reforming California’s corporate tax system to ensure all profitable corporations are contributing their fair share to support essential public services is a necessary step to generate ongoing revenues that the state needs to support the health and well-being of Californians and strengthen economic security for all.

1. Many Corporations Only Pay the Minimum $800 State Tax

Most companies doing business in California are required to pay an $800 “minimum franchise tax” for the privilege of doing business in the state. Yet for nearly half of profitable corporations, this is all they pay in corporate tax to the state, even though they are turning a profit. They are able to do this by taking advantage of a variety of tax breaks that California policymakers have put into place over the years, such as generous tax credits that allow some corporations to essentially zero out their tax bills. For a corporation with $1 million in profits in California, paying only the $800 minimum state tax equates to an effective tax rate of 0.08% — while if it paid the full 8.84% statutory state corporate tax rate on those profits, it would owe $88,400.

Some corporations may also be profitable overall but make it look like they have no profits in the US or in California by shifting profits into foreign tax havens. They can then use the state’s water’s edge election to exclude those “foreign” profits from their total profits for the purposes of their California tax calculations and avoid paying taxes beyond the $800 minimum tax in California. Those corporations are not accounted for in the figures above, which only reflect the share of corporations reporting profits in California that only pay the minimum tax. There is no available data that would allow for distinguishing between corporations that are truly unprofitable and those that have used accounting mechanisms to shield profits from the reach of the state’s tax system.

2. Corporations are Receiving New Federal Tax Cuts, and Many are Paying No Federal Corporate Taxes

In 2017, Congress and the first Trump administration enacted major tax cuts, including slashing the federal corporate tax rate by 40%. In the first four years after those tax cuts, the largest and consistently profitable US corporations collectively saved about $240 billion in federal taxes, according to ITEP estimates. Moreover, after the 2017 law reduced the statutory tax rate from 35% to 21%, many corporations paid effective tax rates — the actual ratio of their tax bills to their profits — far below 21%. ITEP found that the effective tax rate was just 14% on average for Fortune 500 and S&P 500 companies that were consistently profitable from 2018 to 2022. Among this sample, 55 corporations had effective rates of less than 5%, and 23 paid nothing in federal tax across the entire 5-year period.

With H.R. 1, Congress and the second Trump administration doubled down on corporate tax cuts — making permanent some of the temporary tax breaks created in 2017 and rolling back provisions that were meant to raise corporate tax revenues to partially offset the cost of the steep corporate tax rate cut. Over a 10-year period, H.R. 1 will give corporations and other business tax cuts of more than $900 billion, while at the same time making the largest funding cuts to health care and food assistance in US history, which could result in up to 2 million Californians losing Medi-Cal coverage and more than 3 million households in the state losing some or all of their CalFresh food assistance — making life even less affordable for people struggling with the costs of living in the state.

In the wake of H.R. 1, some huge corporations are already reporting that they are paying nothing in federal tax or very low effective tax rates despite soaring profits, at least in part thanks to provisions of the new tax law — including Alphabet (parent company of Google), Amazon, Live Nation (parent company of Ticketmaster), Meta, Palantir, Tesla, and Yum! Brands (parent company of Kentucky Fried Chicken, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell).

3. Corporate Taxes Do Not Limit Businesses’ Ability to Pay Workers

California’s corporate tax is an 8.84% tax on the “net income” of corporations. Net income, or profit, represents the income left over after the corporation’s costs are accounted for — or total revenues minus total expenses. So corporations pay corporate taxes only in years when they are profitable, after they have paid their workers and accounted for other costs. If a corporation breaks even or has a net loss — if expenses exceed revenues — it is only subject to the flat $800 minimum tax. Additionally, it can use that “net operating loss” to offset its taxable income in future years when it is profitable, potentially reducing its tax bill to the minimum tax for several years.

4. Reducing Corporate Tax Avoidance Strategies for Large Corporations Will Not Push Businesses Out of State

For corporations doing business both in and outside of California, the state only taxes a portion of a corporation’s profits. For most types of corporations, this is equal to the portion of the corporation’s total sales made in the state (this proportion is known as its “sales factor”). The tax is not based on where a corporation’s workers, founders, headquarters, or other properties are located. This means a corporation moving its headquarters or other locations out of state will not reduce its tax liability as long as it continues to make sales to California’s customer base of nearly 40 million people.

In fact, an examination of corporate tax returns by the state’s Franchise Tax Board found evidence that corporate taxes are not driving corporations to leave the state. Looking at the tax returns of more than 100 corporations that made a public announcement about leaving or shifting some operations out of California, they found that more than 60% were paying nothing more than the $800 minimum tax and that, on the whole, they paid more in corporate tax to California in the year after their announced departures.

5. Corporate Tax Breaks Worsen Racial Disparities

Corporate tax breaks mainly benefit those who own stock in those corporations, who are disproportionately wealthy and white. Black, Latinx, and other households of color are less likely to own stock either directly or through retirement plans or other investment funds — and even among those who do own stock, the median value of stock holdings is lower among families of color than among white families. These differences reflect generations of disparities in economic opportunities — stemming from racist policies and practices — that have hindered wealth-building for families of color. For example, families of color are less likely to inherit generational wealth, occupational segregation has funnelled workers of color into lower-paying jobs with less access to retirement savings plans, and higher unemployment risks may make some families of color less willing to invest in riskier assets like stocks.

Due to these disparities, white households receive about 88% of the benefits of a corporate tax cut, despite making up only 67% of the population, according to national-level estimates from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP). Meanwhile, Black and Latinx households each only receive about 1% of the benefits, even though they represent 12% and 9% of all households nationwide.

State Policymakers Should Ensure Profitable Corporations Pay Their Fair Share to Help Build a More Prosperous California for All

The maintenance of corporate tax breaks in California law has meant billions of dollars in lost revenues over the years — revenues that could have gone a long way in supporting the health, economic security, and well-being of Californians who have been excluded from economic opportunities and face impossible choices between paying the rent, feeding their families, and accessing health care.

Reining in corporate tax breaks and strengthening the state’s revenue base is long overdue, and even more critical now as the unmet needs of Californians are only growing and the federal safety net is being weakened. Two common-sense solutions are to close the “water’s edge loophole” and place reasonable limits on corporate tax credits and deductions so that no profitable corporation pays next to nothing in corporate taxes.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!