Skip to content

Why We Focus on the State Budget

Every year, California’s governor and Legislature adopt a state budget that provides a framework and funding for critical public services and systems — from child care and health care to housing and transportation to colleges and K-12 schools.

But the state budget is about more than dollars and cents. The budget expresses our values as well as our priorities for Californians and as a state. At its best, the budget should reflect our collective efforts to expand economic opportunities, promote well-being, and improve the lives of Californians who are denied the chance to share in our state’s wealth and who deserve the dignity and support to lead thriving lives.

State budget choices have an impact on all Californians. These decisions affect the quality of our schools and health care, the cost of a college education, families’ access to affordable child care and housing, the availability of services and financial support to help older adults age in place, and so much more.

Because the state budget touches so many services and our everyday lives, it is critical for Californians to understand and participate in the annual budget process to ensure that state leaders are making the strategic choices needed to allow every Californian — from different races, backgrounds, and places — to thrive and share in our state’s economic and social life.

This report sheds light on the state budget and the budget process with the goal of giving Californians the tools they need to effectively engage decision makers and advocate for fair and just policy choices.

Key Takeaways

The Bottom Line

  1. The state spending plan is about more than dollars and cents.
    • Crafting the budget provides an opportunity for Californians to express our values and priorities as a state.
  2. The state Constitution establishes the rules of the budget process.
    • Among other things, these rules allow lawmakers to approve spending with a simple majority vote, but require a two-thirds vote to increase taxes. Voters periodically revise the budget process by approving constitutional amendments.
  3. The governor has the lead role in the budget process.
    • Proposing a state budget for the upcoming fiscal year gives the governor the first word in each year’s budget deliberations.
    • The May Revision gives the governor another opportunity to set the budget and policy agenda for the state.
    • Veto power generally gives the governor the last word.
  4. The Legislature reviews and revises the governor’s proposals.
    • Lawmakers can alter the governor’s proposals and advance their own initiatives as they craft their version of the budget prior to negotiating an agreement with the governor.
  5. Budget decisions are made throughout the year.
    • The public has various opportunities for input during the budget process.
    • This includes writing letters of support or opposition, testifying at legislative hearings, and meeting with officials from the governor’s administration as well as with legislators and members of their staff.
    • In short, Californians have ample opportunity to stay engaged and involved in the budget process year-round.

Key Facts About California’s State Budget

The State Budget = State Funds + Federal Funds

Three Kinds of State Funds

Three kinds of state funds account for almost two-thirds (64.8%) of California’s $495.6 billion budget for 2025-26, the fiscal year that began on July 1, 2025. Specifically:

  1. General Fund — The state General Fund accounts for revenues that are not designated for a specific purpose. Most state support for education, health and human services, and state prisons comes from the General Fund.
  2. Special Funds — Over 500 state special funds account for taxes, fees, and licenses that are designated for a specific purpose.
  3. Bond Funds — State bond funds account for the receipt and disbursement of general obligation (GO) bond proceeds.

Federal funds comprise the rest (35.2%) of the state’s 2025-26 budget.

Most State General Fund and Special Fund Revenue Comes From Three Sources

California’s “big three” taxes

Most state revenue comes from California’s “Big Three” taxes. In 2025-26, General Fund and special fund revenue combined is estimated to total $296.7 billion, with almost 73% ($215.8 billion) expected to come from the Big Three. California’s Big Three taxes are the:

  1. Personal income tax — This is a tax on the income of California residents as well as the income of nonresidents derived from California sources. It is California’s largest source of revenue.
  2. Sales & use tax — This is a tax on the purchase of tangible goods in California (the sales tax) or on the use of tangible goods in California that were purchased elsewhere (the use tax). Services are excluded from the sales and use tax, as are other items exempted by law, including groceries and medications. The sales and use tax is California’s second-largest source of revenue.
  3. Corporation tax — This is a tax imposed on corporations that do business in or derive income from California, with the exception of insurance companies, which instead pay the insurance tax. The corporation tax is California’s third-largest source of revenue.

Other state revenue is estimated to make up more than one-quarter (27.3%) of total projected General Fund and special fund revenue in 2025-26. This other revenue comes from a broad range of sources, including taxes, fees, and fines.

The State Budget is a Local Budget

Dollars spent through the state budget go to individuals, communities, and institutions across California. Under the enacted 2025-26 state budget:

  • Four-fifths of total spending (80.6%) flows as “local assistance” to K-12 public schools, community colleges, families enrolled in the CalWORKs program, and other essential state services and systems that are operated locally.
  • Nearly one-fifth of total spending (17.9%) goes to 23 California State University campuses, 10 University of California campuses, over 30 state prisons, and other recipients of “state operations” dollars.
  • Less than 2% of total spending flows as “capital outlay” dollars, supporting infrastructure projects across California. (Local assistance and state operations dollars also fund infrastructure.)

State Funds Primarily Support Health and Human Services or Education

Under the enacted 2025-26 state budget:

  • Almost 3 in 4 General Fund and special fund dollars support three categories of spending: health and human services (42%), K-12 education (25.1%), and higher education (7.2%).
  • More than 5% of General Fund and special fund dollars go to corrections, primarily the state prison system.
  • The balance of these dollars supports other essential services (such as transportation and environmental protection) and institutions (such as the state’s court system).

Federal Funds Primarily Support Health and Human Services

Under the enacted 2025-26 state budget:

  • Nearly four-fifths of federal dollars (78.3%) support health and human services programs.
  • The balance of federal dollars supports other essential services, including labor and workforce development, K-12 education, higher education, and transportation.

The State Budget is Part of a Package of Bills

The state budget never stands alone. Instead, it moves as part of a package of legislation that typically includes two to three dozen bills, and sometimes many more — particularly in years when there is a budget shortfall and state leaders need to make multiple changes to balance the budget. In 2025, Governor Newsom signed nearly 50 budget-related bills.

The budget package consists of two types of budget bills along with trailer bills and other budget-related legislation.

  1. Budget Act — The state budget is formally known as the Budget Act. The Budget Act is the initial budget bill passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the governor. In general, budget bills:
    • Provide authority to spend money (“appropriations”) across an array of public services and systems for a single year.
    • Move through the Legislature’s budget committees on their own timeline.
  2. Budget Bill Juniors — This is the informal term for any budget bill that amends the Budget Act, such as by increasing or reducing authorized expenditures. There is no limit on the number of Budget Bill Juniors that may be included in a budget package. This means state leaders can revise the Budget Act as many times as they wish by passing additional budget bills.
  3. Trailer bills — The state budget package also includes trailer bills. Trailer bills generally make changes to state law related to the Budget Act and, like budget bills, move through the Legislature’s budget committees. In addition, trailer bills:
    • Must contain at least one appropriation and be listed in the Budget Act — a requirement that directly links trailer bills to the state budget.
    • Are organized by major policy areas in the budget. For example, health-related changes would be included in a “health” trailer bill, housing-related changes would be included in a “housing” trailer bill, etc.
  4. Other budget-related bills — Other bills may be included in the budget package from time to time. These are bills that move independently of the Budget Act (and therefore are not trailer bills) but are still considered part of the state budget framework. This could include, for example, legislation to increase taxes or to place constitutional amendments before the voters as well as bills passed in a special session of the Legislature. This other budget-related legislation can move either through the Legislature’s policy committees or through budget committees.

Terms & Definitions


The Constitutional Framework

The State Constitution Establishes the Rules of the Budget Process

The governor and legislators craft the state’s annual spending plan according to rules outlined in the state Constitution.

California voters periodically revise these rules by approving constitutional amendments that appear on the statewide ballot.

  • Proposals to amend the state Constitution can be placed on the ballot through a citizens’ initiative or by the Legislature.
  • A constitutional amendment takes effect if approved by a simple majority of voters.

Three Key Budget Deadlines

Two in the State Constitution (January 10 and June 15), One in State Law (May 14)



The governor must propose a budget for the upcoming fiscal year on or before January 10. The budget must be balanced: Estimated revenues (as determined by the governor) must meet or exceed the governor’s proposed spending.


The governor must release the May Revision on or before May 14.


The Legislature must pass a budget bill for the upcoming fiscal year by midnight on June 15. The budget bill must be balanced: Estimated General Fund revenues (as set forth in the budget bill passed by the Legislature) must meet or exceed General Fund spending.

Proposition 25: Simple Majority Vote for Budget Bills and Trailer Bills

The budget package generally may be passed by a simple majority vote of each house of the Legislature.

  • Prop. 25 of 2010 allows lawmakers to pass, by a simple majority vote, budget bills as well as trailer bills that may take effect as soon as the governor signs them.
  • Under the rules of Prop. 25, trailer bills must (1) be listed in the Budget Act and (2) contain an appropriation of any amount.
  • Even with Prop. 25, some types of trailer bills that could be included in a budget package will require a supermajority — generally two-thirds — vote of each house. This includes, for example, bills that would raise taxes or amend a state law that was approved by voters via a ballot initiative. However, most trailer bills in the budget package will need only a simple majority vote to pass.

Proposition 25: Penalties for a Late Budget

Lawmakers face penalties if they fail to pass the budget bill on or before June 15.

  • Prop. 25 requires lawmakers to permanently forfeit both their pay and their reimbursement for travel and living expenses for each day after June 15 that the budget bill is not passed and sent to the governor.
  • These penalties do not apply to budget-related bills, which do not have to be passed on or before June 15.

Proposition 26: Supermajority Vote for Tax Increases

Any tax increase requires a two-thirds vote of each house of the Legislature.

  • Under the state Constitution, “any change in state statute which results in any taxpayer paying a higher tax” requires a two-thirds vote of each house.
  • This standard was imposed by Prop. 26 of 2010. This measure expanded the definition of a tax increase and thus the scope of the two-thirds vote requirement, which was originally imposed by Prop. 13 of 1978.
  • Prior to Prop. 26, only bills changing state taxes “for the purpose of increasing revenues” required a two-thirds vote. Bills that increased some taxes but reduced others by an equal or larger amount could be passed by a simple majority vote of each house.

Proposition 26: Supermajority Vote for Tax Increases

Prop. 26 of 2010 also expanded the definition of a tax to include some fees.

  • Prior to Prop. 26, lawmakers could create or increase fees by a simple majority vote. These majority-vote fees included regulatory fees intended to address health, environmental, or other problems caused by various products, such as alcohol, oil, or hazardous materials.
  • Prop. 26 reclassified regulatory and certain other fees as taxes. As a result, a two-thirds vote of each house of the Legislature is now required for many charges that previously were considered fees and could be passed by a simple majority vote.

Additional Supermajority Vote Requirements

The state Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of each house of the Legislature in order to:

  • Appropriate money from the General Fund, except for appropriations that are for public schools or that are included in budget bills or in trailer bills.
  • Pass bills that take effect immediately (urgency statutes), except for budget bills and trailer bills.
  • Place constitutional amendments or general obligation bond measures before the voters.
  • Override the governor’s veto of a bill or an item of appropriation.

Proposition 54: A Bill Must Be Published for At Least 72 Hours Before the Legislature Can Act on It

Proposition 54 of 2016 requires bills to be distributed to legislators and published on the Internet, in their final form, at least 72 hours before being passed by the Legislature.

This rule applies to all bills, including the budget bill and other legislation included in the budget package.

This mandatory review period can be waived for a bill if:

  • The governor declares an emergency in response to a disaster or extreme peril, and
  • Two-thirds of legislators in the house considering the bill vote to waive the review period.

Proposition 98: A Funding Guarantee for K-12 Schools and Community Colleges

Prop. 98 of 1988 guarantees a minimum annual level of funding for K-14 education.

  • The amount of the guarantee is calculated each year based on one of three tests that apply under varying fiscal and economic conditions. Two of these tests include adjustments for changes in statewide K-12 attendance. Prop. 98 funding comes from the state General Fund and local property tax revenues.
  • The Legislature can suspend the guarantee for a single year by a two-thirds vote of each house and provide less funding. Following a suspension, the state must increase Prop. 98 funding over time to the level that it would have reached absent the suspension.
  • While the Legislature can provide more funding than Prop. 98 requires, the guarantee has generally served as a maximum funding level.

Proposition 2: Saving for a Rainy Day, Paying Down Debt

Prop. 2 of 2014 revised the rules that apply to the Budget Stabilization Account (BSA) — the state’s constitutional rainy day fund — and also established a new requirement to pay down state budgetary debt.

  • The state is required to set aside 1.5% of General Fund revenues each year, plus additional dollars in years when tax revenues from capital gains are particularly strong.
  • Until 2029-30, half of the revenues go into the BSA and the other half must be used to pay down state budgetary debt, which includes unfunded pension liabilities. Starting in 2030-31, the entire annual transfer goes into the BSA.
  • State policymakers may suspend or reduce the BSA deposit and withdraw funds from the reserve, but only under limited circumstances that qualify as a “budget emergency.”

Proposition 2: A Budget Reserve for K-12 Education

Prop. 2 of 2014 also created a state budget reserve for K-12 schools and community colleges called the Public School System Stabilization Account (PSSSA).

  • Deposits come from state capital gains tax revenues in years when those revenues are particularly strong.
  • However, various conditions must be met before these dollars could be transferred to the PSSSA. For example, transfers may occur only in so-called “Test 1” years under Prop. 98, which have been relatively rare.

Proposition 55: Potential New Funding for Medi-Cal From a Tax on the Wealthiest Californians

Prop. 55 of 2016 extends, through 2030, personal income tax rate increases on very high-income Californians and establishes a formula to boost funding for Medi-Cal, which provides health care services to Californians with low incomes.

  • Starting in 2018-19, General Fund revenues — including those raised by Prop. 55 — must first be used to fund (1) the annual Prop. 98 guarantee for K-12 schools and community colleges and (2) the cost of other services that were authorized as of January 1, 2016, as adjusted for population changes, federal mandates, and other factors.
  • If any Prop. 55 revenues remain after meeting these required expenditures, MediCal would receive 50% of this excess, up to a maximum of $2 billion in any fiscal year.
  • Prop. 55 has not yet resulted in any additional funding for Medi-Cal.

Proposition 4: State Appropriations Limit (SAL) — A Cap on Spending

Appropriations are subject to a limit established by Prop. 4 of 1979, as modified by later initiatives. This spending cap is known as the Gann Limit.

  • The SAL limits the amount of state tax proceeds that can be appropriated each year. This limit is adjusted annually for changes in population and per capita personal income.
  • Some appropriations from tax proceeds do not count toward the limit, including debt service and spending that is needed to comply with court or federal mandates.
  • Revenues that exceed the SAL over a two-year period are divided equally between Prop. 98 spending and taxpayer rebates. The state last exceeded the SAL in 2020-21 (but did not do so in the prior year).

State Mandates: Pay for Them or Suspend Them

The state must pay for or suspend mandates that it imposes on local governments.

  • Prop. 4 of 1979 requires the state to reimburse local governments for costs related to a new program or a higher level of service that is mandated by the state.
  • Prop. 1A of 2004 expanded the definition of a mandate to include the transfer of
    financial responsibility from the state to local governments.
  • Prop. 1A also requires the state to suspend a mandate in any year in which local
    governments’ costs are not fully reimbursed.

What Do the Governor and the Legislature Do?

The Governor

Approves, modifies, or rejects spending proposals prepared by state departments and agencies through an internal process coordinated by the Department of Finance.

Proposes a spending plan for the state each January, introduced as the budget bill in the Legislature.

Updates and revises the proposed budget each May (the “May Revision”).

Signs or vetoes the bills included in the budget package.

Can veto all or part of individual appropriations (line items), but cannot increase any appropriations above the level approved by the Legislature.

The Legislature

Approves, modifies, or rejects the governor’s proposals.

Can add new spending or make other changes that substantially revise the governor’s proposals.

Needs a simple majority vote of each house to pass budget bills and most trailer bills.

Needs a two-thirds vote to pass certain other bills that may be part of the budget package, such as bills that increase taxes or propose constitutional amendments.

Needs a two-thirds vote of each house to override the governor’s veto of a bill or an appropriation.


What Happens When?

The State Budget Timeline

The state budget process is cyclical. Decisions are made throughout the year.


State Budget Resources

  • Department of Finance: The governor’s budget proposals and related documents.
  • Legislative Analyst’s Office: Budget and policy analyses, budget recommendations, and historical budget data.
  • Legislative Counsel: Bills and bill analyses, a free bill-tracking service, the state codes, and the state Constitution.
  • State Assembly and Senate: Committee agendas and other publications, floor session and committee schedules, the annual legislative calendar, and live and archived video streaming of legislative proceedings.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Statement on the Legislative Analyst’s Office 2026-27 Fiscal Outlook

SACRAMENTO, CA — In response to the Legislative Analyst’s Office’s (LAO) 2026-27 Fiscal Outlook, the California Budget & Policy Center (Budget Center), a nonpartisan research and analysis nonprofit, issued the following statement from its budget director, Scott Graves: “Despite higher income tax collections, the LAO’s 2026–27 Fiscal Outlook estimates that California still faces an $18 … Continued

What’s the difference between a trailer bill and a policy bill? A surplus and an operating surplus? Special funds and the General Fund? And what exactly is a “Budget Bill Jr.”? Understanding these and other key budget-related terms is critical to navigating the California state budget process and effectively engaging decision-makers in order to advocate for fair and just policy choices for communities across the state.

Key Terms

The Budget Center’s essential resources for understanding and navigating the California state budget — all in one place.

Rotunda California Capital building in Sacramento

See our report Dollars and Democracy: A Guide to the California State Budget Process to learn more about the state budget and budget process.

The federal government plays a major role in shaping California’s budget, economy, and the well-being of its people.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Join the Dollars & Democracy budget training to strengthen your understanding of the state budget process and prepare for 2026.

Register here!

About this event

Tune in to Dollars & Democracy, the Budget Center’s premier state budget training, followed by a panel discussion that will help you understand and effectively engage in the California state budget process.

This training is designed for advocates who are new to the field or want to refresh their understanding of the state budget process. We’ll break down California’s budget process, highlighting key deadlines and the essential role the governor, Legislature, and advocates play in advancing community investments.

After the training, stay for a panel discussion with state budget experts who will share practical advocacy strategies and insights into what’s ahead for 2026.

Budget Trainer

Dollars and Democracy training

  • Nishi Nair, Research Associate, California Budget & Policy Center

Discussion Panel

Looking ahead and what to expect in 2026

  • Sasha Feldstein, Strategy & Impact Director, California Budget & Policy Center
  • Tiyesha Watts, Associate Director of Policy Advocacy, California Housing Partnership
  • Edgar Ortiz, Supervisory Policy Manager, Economic Justice, California Immigrant Policy Center

About the California Budget & Policy Center

The California Budget & Policy Center (Budget Center) is a nonpartisan research and analysis nonprofit advancing public policies that expand opportunities and promote well-being for all Californians.

The Budget Center’s essential resources for understanding and navigating the California state budget — all in one place.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Watch to learn more

Some decisions in California’s Legislature require more than a simple majority — they need a supermajority, or two-thirds vote. But what does that really mean, and why does it matter for Californians?

In this short explainer, we break down how Proposition 26 changed the rules around taxes and fees, what kinds of actions require a supermajority vote, and how this impacts the ability of lawmakers to make policy decisions that affect everyday people.

The Budget Center’s essential resources for understanding and navigating the California state budget — all in one place.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Read this publication in English.

El proceso legislativo: Principios básicos

El proceso legislativo, también conocido como el proceso de proyectos de ley, proporciona una vía clave para que los californianos que desean cambiar la ley estatal puedan hacerlo a través de la legislatura del estado.

Cada año, los miembros de la asamblea legislativa y el senado presentan conjuntamente miles de proyectos de ley que avanzan a través del proceso legislativo parcial o totalmente. Estos proyectos proponen cambios a uno o más de los casi 30 códigos estatales de California y estos cambios entran en vigencia solo si el proyecto de ley es aprobado por ambas cámaras y firmado por el gobernador.

Las propuestas de modificar la Constitución del estado también pasan por el proceso legislativo. Aunque las modificaciones constitucionales de la asamblea legislativa y el senado no requieren la firma del gobernador, sí necesitan la aprobación de los votantes para poder entrar en vigencia.

El proceso legislativo funciona de acuerdo a normas delineadas en la Constitución del estado, las leyes estatales y los acuerdos de ambas cámaras (“normas conjuntas”) adoptados por la asamblea legislativa y el senado al inicio de cada sesión legislativa de dos años.

Las normas escritas y no escritas exclusivas de cada cámara, así como de diversos comités dentro de cada cámara y que cambian de un año a otro, también moldean el proceso legislativo y las participaciones de participación del público.

Es importante resaltar que el proceso del presupuesto estatal ofrece una vía separada para cambiar la ley estatal a través de la legislatura (usando proyectos de ley “tráiler”). Comparado con el proceso legislativo, el proceso de presupuesto estatal tiene normas, plazos y, en algunos casos, encargados de tomar decisiones distintos. Quienes abogan por el cambio legislativo usan tanto el proceso de presupuesto estatal como el legislativo para impulsar sus metas políticas. Sin embargo, el resto de esta guía se concentra exclusivamente en el proceso legislativo.

Oportunidades para la participación del público en el proceso legislativo

El público tiene muchas oportunidades de interactuar con los legisladores estatales durante el proceso legislativo. Por ejemplo, las personas pueden:

  • Sugerir ideas de proyectos de ley a los miembros de la legislatura.
  • Desarrollar / renovar relaciones con los legisladores y su personal para desarrollar familiaridad y confianza, elementos cruciales para obtener autores de proyectos de ley e impulsar la legislación.
  • Conocer a los legisladores y a su personal, así como miembros del gobierno del gobernador para defender legislación y abordar cualquier inquietud.
  • Escribir cartas a los comités y a legisladores individuales para compartir opiniones sobre los proyectos de ley que se han presentado.
  • Asistir a audiencias de comités legislativos para compartir opiniones sobre los proyectos de ley durante los períodos de comentario público.
  • Instar al gobernador a que firme o vete una ley.

Comités de política

Los miembros de comités de políticas de la asamblea de legisladores y el senado consideran las consecuencias políticas de un proyecto de ley. El liderazgo de cada cámara asigna los proyectos de ley a comités de política según el tema de los proyectos y otros factores. Los proyectos de ley pueden ser revisados por un solo comité de política en cada cámara o por varios comités de política.

El senado estatal tiene más de 20 comités de política actuales, y la asamblea tiene más de 30. El Comité de Educación de la asamblea legislativa (Assembly Education Committee) y el Comité de Ingresos e Impuestos del senado son algunos ejemplos. Los proyectos de ley que se aprueban en esta etapa, potencialmente con modificaciones, se transfieren al comité de apropiaciones para revisarse en más profundidad.

Los comités de asignaciones y el “archivo de asuntos pendientes”

Los comités de asignaciones calculan el costo de los proyectos de ley. Si el costo alcanza o supera ciertos umbrales, en general el proyecto se coloca en el archivo de asuntos pendientes del comité, que esencialmente es una “sala de espera” para los proyectos que se examinan en mayor profundidad. Los umbrales de costo son relativamente bajos en ambas cámaras. En el senado, el umbral varía entre $50,000 y $150,000, depende del fondo estatal del que se tomará el dinero. El umbral en la asamblea legislativa es $150,000, sin importar cuál sea el fondo.

Dos veces por año, los comités de apropiaciones organizan audiencias donde anuncian rápidamente el destino de cientos de proyectos de ley que se encuentran en su archivo de asuntos pendientes. Los proyectos que se sacan del archivo de asuntos pendientes mediante un voto, frecuentemente con enmiendas, pasan a la asamblea legislativa o el senado. Los proyectos de ley que continúan “en suspenso” en el comité de apropiaciones quedan inactivas por el resto del año.

Los proyectos de ley pueden quedar en suspenso por una variedad de razones, inclusive preocupaciones por su costo. Sin embargo, típicamente los directores de los comités no explican públicamente por qué algunos proyectos pasan a la asamblea legislativa o el senado y otros se mantienen en suspenso.

Votos formales de toda la legislatura: Mayoría simple o súper mayoría

Una vez que un proyecto de ley es aprobado por el comité final en su “cámara de origen”, se programa para debatirse y votar en el pleno de la cámara. La mayoría de los proyectos de ley solo necesitan una mayoría simple para ser aprobados: 41 votos en la asamblea legislativa de 80 miembros y 21 votos en el senado de 40 miembros.

Sin embargo, se requieren dos tercios (una súper mayoría) de los votos en cada cámara si el proyecto de ley:

  • Genera un impuesto nuevo o aumenta un impuesto existente.
  • Contiene una cláusula de “urgencia” que le permite entrar en vigencia de inmediato en lugar de esperar hasta el 1 de enero (la fecha típica).
  • Propone enmendar la Constitución del estado, un cambio que en última instancia debe ser aprobado por una mayoría de los votantes en una elección estatal.

Enjuagar y repetir: El proceso se traslada al senado estatal

Si un proyecto de ley es aprobado en la primera cámara, pasa a la cámara alta, donde se repite el proceso: comités de política, comité de apropiaciones, voto de la cámara en pleno. Típicamente los proyectos de ley son modificados una vez más en esta etapa. Si se aprueban con enmiendas, el proyecto vuelve a la cámara baja para una votación de “conformidad”. Los proyectos de ley aprobados con un voto de conformidad pasan al gobernador para su consideración final.

Aprobación o veto: Los proyectos de ley aprobados se envían al gobernador.

Una vez que un proyecto de ley recibe la aprobación legislativa final, se le envía al gobernador, quien puede:

  • Firmar el proyecto de ley para que se convierta en ley.
  • Permitir que el proyecto de ley se convierta en ley sin una firma.
  • Vetar, rechazar, el proyecto de ley. La legislatura puede anular un veto con dos tercios de los votos en cada cámara. Sin embargo, la anulación de vetos es extremadamente infrecuente.

Típicamente, los proyectos de ley aprobados por mayoría simple entran en vigencia el 1 de enero del año calendario siguiente. Los estatutos urgentes, aumentos de impuestos y otros proyectos de ley específicos entran en vigencia en cuanto se convierten en ley.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Californians typically pay more in federal taxes than the state receives in federal spending each year, making California a “donor state.”1All years in this fact sheet represent federal fiscal years (FFYs), which begin every October 1 and end the following September 30. The data presented in this fact sheet differs from the data included in an earlier Budget Center fact sheet — published in February 2025 — for a few reasons. First, this fact sheet analyzes data for nine fiscal years (FFYs 2015 to 2023), whereas the earlier fact sheet displayed these data for only a single fiscal year (FFY 2022). Second, this fact sheet displays federal spending data in two ways — with and without federal COVID funds — whereas the earlier fact sheet displayed spending data only with COVID funds. Finally, the data for FFY 2022 differ across the two fact sheets because the Rockefeller Institute of Government recently revised the FFY 2022 data. Between federal fiscal years (FFYs) 2015 and 2023, federal taxes paid by California residents and businesses exceeded federal spending in every year except 2020, 2021, and 2023.2FFY 2023 is the most recent year for which the Rockefeller Institute of Government’s 50-state analysis is available. In other words, California was a donor state in six out of the nine fiscal years for which data are available.

California likely would have been a donor state in additional years during this period if not for federal COVID funding. Since 2020, federal expenditures have included the substantial — but temporary — support provided to states, businesses, and individuals to address the COVID pandemic. These one-time COVID funds caused federal expenditures in California to jump significantly, which in turn has understated California’s role as a donor state.3In the four years leading up to the start of the pandemic in FFY 2020, annual federal spending in California hovered between $400 billion and $450 billion. That number jumped to over $750 billion in FFY 2020 as the pandemic took hold and federal COVID spending ramped up. Federal spending in California remained above $600 billion as recently as FFY 2023.

Excluding temporary COVID funds from the analysis provides a more accurate picture of the long-term underlying fiscal trends and California’s true position as a donor state. Using this alternative analysis, between FFYs 2015 and 2023, Californians paid more in federal taxes than the state received in federal spending in eight out of these nine years (2020 is the exception). For example, Californians’ federal taxes exceeded federal spending — excluding COVID spending — by $55 billion in 2021, $101 billion in 2022, and $17 billion in 2023.

Why Is California a Donor State?

Why do Californians typically contribute more to the federal treasury than the state gets back in federal funding? The explanation touches on both the spending and revenue sides of the equation.

On the spending side:

  • States with higher poverty rates, a large population of older adults, major federal facilities (such as military bases), a large volume of federal contracts, and/or a substantial federal employee presence are likely to receive a disproportionate share of federal funds. These factors contribute to relatively higher federal spending in many other states (on a per capita basis) compared to California.

On the revenue side:

  • States with more wealthy residents and high per capita incomes — like California — account for a disproportionate share of federal tax revenue due to the progressive federal tax system.
Portrait of child girl eating on snack time at school

H.R. 1 and the Federal Budget

H.R. 1, the harmful Republican mega bill passed in July 2025, will deeply harm Californians by cutting funding for essential programs like health care, food assistance, and education.

See how California leaders can respond and protect vital supports.

With Trump-Era Federal Budget Cuts, the Gap Between California’s Federal Tax Contributions and Federal Spending in the State Will Increase

In July 2025, President Trump signed into law a budget bill (H.R. 1) that will deeply harm Californians by cutting spending for essential programs like health care, food assistance, and education in order to help fund massive tax breaks to the wealthy and corporations, and increased immigration enforcement. The spending cuts included in H.R. 1 will disproportionately impact families with low incomes, immigrants, and communities of color, pushing more people into poverty and widening racial and economic inequities across the state.

State policymakers can mitigate the harm of H.R. 1., however, the massive federal funding cuts are too large to be entirely backfilled with state dollars. As a result, essential services like Medi-Cal health coverage and CalFresh food assistance are in jeopardy as state leaders assess how to address the impact of harmful federal reductions.

Moreover, as the provisions of H.R. 1 are implemented through 2028, the gap between what Californians pay in federal taxes and federal spending in the state will grow larger.

This is because Californians will continue to disproportionately contribute to federal revenues whereas California will get back even less of those dollars as deep cuts to health care, food assistance, and other vital services take effect.

Federal Tax Dollars Should Be Used to Strengthen Essential Services

California contributes much to the nation thanks to the creativity, vitality, and hard work of the nearly 40 million people of diverse backgrounds who call the Golden State their home.

Federal tax dollars — including Californians’ very generous contributions to the federal treasury — should be used to strengthen vital public services and help all people make ends meet, rather than helping corporations and the wealthy avoid paying their fair share of federal taxes.

Update: This fact sheet was revised in August 2025 to include newly released federal tax and spending data from the Rockefeller Institute of Government (federal fiscal years 2015–2023), with revised figures and updated charts.

The Budget Center’s essential resources for understanding and navigating the California state budget — all in one place.

  • 1
    All years in this fact sheet represent federal fiscal years (FFYs), which begin every October 1 and end the following September 30. The data presented in this fact sheet differs from the data included in an earlier Budget Center fact sheet — published in February 2025 — for a few reasons. First, this fact sheet analyzes data for nine fiscal years (FFYs 2015 to 2023), whereas the earlier fact sheet displayed these data for only a single fiscal year (FFY 2022). Second, this fact sheet displays federal spending data in two ways — with and without federal COVID funds — whereas the earlier fact sheet displayed spending data only with COVID funds. Finally, the data for FFY 2022 differ across the two fact sheets because the Rockefeller Institute of Government recently revised the FFY 2022 data.
  • 2
    FFY 2023 is the most recent year for which the Rockefeller Institute of Government’s 50-state analysis is available.
  • 3
    In the four years leading up to the start of the pandemic in FFY 2020, annual federal spending in California hovered between $400 billion and $450 billion. That number jumped to over $750 billion in FFY 2020 as the pandemic took hold and federal COVID spending ramped up. Federal spending in California remained above $600 billion as recently as FFY 2023.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!

Cuts to Health Care, Food, Housing, and More Put Latinx and Immigrant Californians at Risk, New Report Finds

SACRAMENTO, CA — The California Budget & Policy Center (Budget Center), in collaboration with the California Immigrant Policy Center (CIPC), released a new report today: How Federal and State Budget Cuts Threaten Latinx Californians. The report details how harmful recent federal and state budget cuts are slashing access to health care, food assistance, child care, … Continued