SACRAMENTO, CA — Following Governor Newsom’s 2026-27 budget proposal released this morning, the California Budget & Policy Center (Budget Center), a nonpartisan research and analysis nonprofit, weighed in with the following statement from its executive director, Chris Hoene. “California’s state budget is a reflection of our shared values and our responsibility to care for one … Continued
Budget Center experts break down Governor Newsom’s 2026-27 California budget proposal and its impacts on communities and the state’s economy.
Following Governor Newsom’s proposed 2026-27 budget, the Budget Center team will provide an overview of significant proposals and address critical questions about our state’s fiscal future.
In Newsom’s final year in office, the January budget proposal reflects his priorities and California’s response to the harsh realities of the sweeping Republican megabill H.R. 1, with significant implications for the legacy he leaves for Californians.
Our budget experts will unpack what the proposal means for Californians, with a focus on:
The governor’s overall approach, including notable policy shifts and their potential impacts across the state
California’s response to the harm in H.R. 1 and other federal actions
How the proposal addresses — or fails to address — racial and economic inequities in our state
What’s missing and what actionable solutions policymakers can take to protect Californians
Join us as we kick off a new budget season and dive into the tools, policies, and investments that can help shape a budget focused on equity and thriving communities for all.
We’re pleased to offer live Spanish interpretation for this webinar. Este seminario web contará con interpretación simultánea en español.
En español
Les ofrecemos una sincera disculpa por los problemas técnicos con la interpretación al español que ocurrieron durante el webinar. Hemos preparado una versión completa del evento en español, disponible aquí.
Gracias también a quienes nos apoyaron durante el webinar compartiendo información en español en el chat. Agradecemos su paciencia mientras ampliamos el acceso a nuestros recursos en español.
About the California Budget & Policy Center
The California Budget & Policy Center (Budget Center) is a nonpartisan research and analysis nonprofit advancing public policies that expand opportunities and promote well-being for all Californians.
Want to Better Understand the State Budget?
The Budget Center’s essential resources for understanding and navigating the California state budget — all in one place.
Explore tools, videos, and expert insights designed to strengthen your advocacy and guide informed decision-making.
Cada año, el gobernador y la asamblea legislativa adoptan un presupuesto estatal que provee un marco y fondos para servicios y sistemas públicos esenciales: desde cuidado infantil y atención médica y transporte hasta universidades y escuelas de jardín de infantes al décimo primer grado.
Pero el presupuesto estatal no es solo dólares y centavos.
El presupuesto expresa nuestros valores así como nuestras prioridades para los californianos y como estado. En su mejor versión, el presupuesto debe reflejar nuestra labor colectiva para expandir las oportunidades económicas, promover el bienestar y mejorar las vidas de los californianos que no tiene la oportunidad de compartir la riqueza de nuestro estado y merecen tener dignidad y apoyo para vivir vidas prósperas.
Las elecciones del presupuesto estatal afectan a todos los californianos. Estas decisiones afectan la calidad de nuestras escuelas y nuestra atención médica, el costo de la educación terciaria, el acceso de las familias a cuidado infantil y vivienda asequibles, la disponibilidad de servicios y apoyo financiero para ayudar a los adultos mayores a envejecer sin tener que mudarse, y muchísimo más.
Como el presupuesto estatal afecta tantos servicios y nuestras vidas cotidianas, es esencial que los californianos entiendan el proceso de presupuesto anual y participen en él para asegurar que los líderes del estado tomen las decisiones estratégicas necesarias para permitir que todo californiano, sin importar su raza, sus antecedentes ni dónde se encuentre, prospere y pueda participar en la vida económica y social de nuestro estado.
Este informe ofrece información sobre el presupuesto estatal y su proceso con la meta de brindar a los californianos las herramientas que necesitan para interactuar eficazmente con los encargados de tomar decisiones y abogar por decisiones políticas justas y equitativas.
CONCLUSIONES CLAVE
Temas más importantes
El plan de gastos del estado no es solo dólares y centavos.
La creación del presupuesto les da a los californianos la oportunidad de expresar sus valores y prioridades como estado.
La Constitución estatal expone las normas del proceso presupuestario.
Entre otras cosas, estas normas permiten que los legisladores aprueben los gastos mediante un voto de mayoría simple, pero exige un voto de las dos terceras partes para aumentar los impuestos. Los votantes modifican el proceso presupuestario periódicamente aprobando enmiendas constitucionales.
El gobernador tiene una función de liderazgo en el proceso presupuestario.
Proponer un presupuesto estatal para el año fiscal siguiente le da al gobernador la primera palabra en las deliberaciones presupuestarias de cada año.
La revisión de mayo le da al gobernador otra oportunidad de establecer el plan presupuestario y político para el estado.
En general, el poder de veto le otorga la última palabra al gobernador.
La asamblea legislativa revisa y modifica las propuestas del gobernador.
Los legisladores pueden modificar las propuestas del gobernador e impulsar sus propias iniciativas al elaborar su versión del presupuesto antes de negociar un acuerdo con el gobernador.
Las decisiones presupuestarias se toman durante todo el año.
El público tiene varias oportunidades de expresar sus opiniones en el proceso presupuestario.
Esto incluye escribir cartas de apoyo o protesta, atestiguar en audiencias legislativas y reunirse con funcionarios del gobierno de gobernador, así como legisladores y miembros de su personal.
En pocas palabras, los californianos tienen amplias oportunidades de participar en el proceso presupuestario durante todo el año.
DATOS CLAVE SOBRE EL PRESUPUESTO ESTATAL DE CALIFORNIA
PRESUPUESTO ESTATAL = FONDOS ESTATALES + FONDOS
federales tres tipos de fondos estatales
Existen tres tipos de fondos estatales que conforman casi las dos terceras partes (64.8%) de presupuesto de $495.6 billones de California para 2025-26, el año fiscal que comenzó el 1 de julio de 2025. Específicamente:
Fondo general: El fondo general estatal cuenta con ingresos públicos que no están designados para un propósito específico. La mayor parte de los fondos para la educación, los servicios de salud y humanos y las prisiones del estado viene del fondo general.
Fondos especiales: Existen más de 500 fondos estatales especiales que administran impuestos, tasas y licencias designados para un propósito específico.
Fondos de bonos: Los fondos de bonos del estado registran la recepción y el desembolso de los recursos provenientes de bonos de obligación general (GO).
Los fondos federales constituyen el resto (35.2%) del presupuesto estatal de 2025-26.
LA MAYOR PARTE DE LOS INGRESOS PÚBLICOS DEL FONDO ESTATAL GENERAL Y ESPECIAL VIENE DE TRES FUENTES
los “tres grandes” impuestos de california
La mayor parte de los ingresos públicos vienen de los “tres grandes” impuestos de California. El total estimado de ingresos públicos del fondo general y el fondo especial combinados en 2025-26 es $296.7 billones, de los cuales casi el 73% ($215.8 billones) proviene de los tres grandes impuestos. Los tres grandes impuestos de California son:
Impuesto sobre los ingresos personales: Este es un impuesto sobre los ingresos de los residentes de California, así como sobre los ingresos de los no residentes provenientes de fuentes ubicadas en California. Es la mayor fuente de ingresos del estado de California.
Impuesto sobre las ventas y el uso: Este es un impuesto sobre la compra de bienes tangibles en California (el impuesto sobre las ventas) o sobre el uso en California de bienes tangibles que fueron adquiridos en otro lugar (el impuesto sobre el uso). Los servicios están excluidos del impuesto sobre las ventas y el uso, al igual que otros artículos exentos por ley, incluidos los alimentos y los medicamentos. El impuesto sobre las ventas y el uso es la segunda mayor fuente de ingresos públicos del estado de California.
Impuesto sobre las corporaciones: Este es un impuesto que se aplica a las corporaciones que hacen negocios en California o que obtienen ingresos provenientes de California, con la excepción de las compañías de seguros, que en su lugar pagan el impuesto sobre los seguros. El impuesto sobre las corporaciones es la tercera mayor fuente de ingresos públicos del estado de California.
Se estima que otros ingresos públicos del estado forman más de una cuarta parte (27.3 %) del total proyectado de ingresos del fondo general y de los fondos especiales en 2025-26. Estos otros ingresos públicos provienen de una amplia variedad de fuentes, incluidos impuestos, tarifas y multas.
EL PRESUPUESTO DEL ESTADO ES UN PRESUPUESTO LOCAL
Los dólares que se gastan a través del presupuesto estatal se destinan a personas, comunidades e instituciones en todo California. Según el presupuesto estatal aprobado para 2025-26:
Cuatro quintos de los gastos totales (80.6%) se destina en calidad de “asistencia local” a las escuelas públicas de jardín de infantes al décimo segundo grado, las escuelas terciarias comunitarias (Colleges), las familias inscritas en el programa CalWORKs y otros servicios y sistemas esenciales del estado que funcionan localmente.
Casi un quinto de los gastos totales (17.9%) se destina a 23 universidades estatales de California, más de 30 prisiones estatales y otros destinatarios de dólares para “operaciones estatales”.
Menos del 2 % del gasto total se destina a “gastos de capital”, que apoyan proyectos de infraestructura en todo California. (La asistencia local y los fondos de operaciones estatales también financian infraestructura).
LOS FONDOS DEL ESTADO FINANCIAN PRINCIPALMENTE LOS SERVICIOS DE SALUD Y HUMANOS O LA EDUCACIÓN
Según el presupuesto estatal aprobado para 2025-26:
Casi 3 de cada 4 dólares del fondo general y el fondo especial financian tres categorías de gastos: servicios de salud y humanos (42%), educación de jardín de infantes al décimo segundo grado (25.1%), y educación superior (7.2%).
Más del 5% de los dólares del fondo general y especial se destinan al sistema correccional, principalmente el sistema de prisiones estatales.
El saldo de estos dólares financian otros servicios esenciales (tales como el transporte y la protección medioambiental) e instituciones (tales como el sistema de tribunales estatales).
LOS FONDOS FEDERALES FINANCIAN PRINCIPALMENTE SERVICIOS DE SALUD Y HUMANOS
Según el presupuesto estatal aprobado para 2025-26:
Casi cuatro quintos de los dólares federales (78.3%) financian programas de servicios de salud y humanos.
El saldo de los dólares federales financia otros servicios esenciales, como el desarrollo de la fuerza laboral, la educación de jardín de infantes al décimo segundo grado, la educación superior y el transporte.
EL PRESUPUESTO ESTATAL FORMA PARTE DE UN PAQUETE DE PROYECTOS DE LEY
El presupuesto estatal nunca se presenta de manera aislada. En su lugar, avanza como parte de un paquete de legislación que por lo general incluye entre dos y tres docenas de proyectos de ley, y en ocasiones muchos más, en particular en los años en que existe un déficit presupuestario y los líderes estatales necesitan hacer múltiples cambios para equilibrar el presupuesto. En 2025, el gobernador Newsom firmó casi 50 proyectos de ley relacionados con el presupuesto.
cuatro tipos de proyectos de ley relacionados con el presupuesto
El paquete presupuestario incluye dos tipos de proyectos de ley presupuestarios con proyectos de ley asociados y otras leyes relacionadas con el presupuesto.
Ley de Presupuesto: El presupuesto estatal se conoce formalmente como la Ley de Presupuesto. La Ley de Presupuesto es el presupuesto inicial aprobado por la asamblea legislativa y firmada por el gobernador para convertirla en ley. En general, los proyectos de ley presupuestarios:
Otorgan autoridad para gastar dinero (“apropiaciones”) en una gama de servicios y sistemas públicos para un solo año.
Pasan por los comités presupuestarios de la asamblea legislativa según su propio calendario.
Proyecto de ley presupuestario junior: Este es el término informal que se utiliza para referirse a cualquier proyecto de ley presupuestario que modifica la Ley de Presupuesto, por ejemplo, aumentando o reduciendo los gastos autorizados. No existe un límite en la cantidad de proyectos de ley presupuestarios complementarios que pueden incluirse en un paquete presupuestario. Esto significa que las autoridades estatales pueden modificar la Ley de Presupuesto tantas veces como lo deseen mediante la aprobación de proyectos de ley presupuestarios adicionales.
Proyectos de ley remolque (trailer bills): El paquete presupuestario del estado también incluye proyectos de ley remolque. Los proyectos de ley remolque generalmente introducen cambios en la legislación estatal relacionados con la Ley de Presupuesto y, al igual que los proyectos de ley presupuestarios, avanzan a través de los comités presupuestarios de la asamblea legislativa. Además, los proyectos de ley remolque:
Deben contener al menos una asignación presupuestaria y estar incluidos en la Ley de Presupuesto, un requisito que los vincula directamente con el presupuesto estatal.
Están organizados por grandes áreas de política pública dentro del presupuesto. Por ejemplo, los cambios relacionados con la salud se incluirían en un proyecto de ley remolque para la “salud” y los cambios relacionados con la vivienda se incluirían en un proyecto de ley remolque para la “vivienda”, y así sucesivamente.
Otros proyectos de ley relacionados con el presupuesto: Se pueden incluir otros proyectos de ley en el paquete presupuestario de tanto en tanto. Estos son proyectos de ley que avanzan independientemente de la Ley de Presupuesto (y por lo tanto no son proyectos de ley remolque) pero igual se consideran parte del marco del presupuesto estatal. Esto puede incluir, por ejemplo, leyes para aumentar los impuestos o presentar enmiendas constitucionales a los votantes así como los proyectos de ley aprobados en una sesión especial de la asamblea legislativa. Estas otras leyes relacionadas con el presupuesto pueden avanzar ya sea a través de los comités de políticas de la asamblea legislativa como a través de los comités presupuestarios.
Comité presupuestario de la cámara de representantes y comité presupuestario y de revisión fiscal del senado
Revisan las propuestas presupuestarias del gobernador y elaboran la versión del presupuesto estatal de cada cámara. La mayor parte del trabajo de los comités presupuestario se hace a través de subcomités que se enfocan en áreas específicas de política pública.
Ley de Presupuesto
El proyecto de ley presupuestario inicial aprobado por la Legislatura y promulgado como ley por el gobernador, después de aplicar cualquier veto a partidas específicas. La Ley de Presupuesto puede identificarse por el año en el que entra en vigor («Ley de Presupuesto de 2026») o por el año fiscal al que corresponde («Ley de Presupuesto 2026-27»).
Proyecto de ley presupuestario junior
Es el término informal que se usa para describir todo proyecto de ley presupuestario que modifica la Ley de Presupuesto. Los proyectos de ley junior se pueden numerar en secuencia usando números romanos (por ejemplo, proyecto de ley junior I, proyecto de ley junior II, etc.).
Proyectos de ley relacionados con el presupuesto (“proyectos de ley remolque”)
En general hacen cambios a la ley estatal relacionada con la Ley de Presupuesto. Estos proyectos de ley se conocen formalmente como “proyectos de ley … relacionados con el proyecto de ley presupuestario”, pero se conocen más comúnmente como “proyectos de ley remolque (trailer)”. Los proyectos de ley remolque se indican en la Ley de Presupuesto y avanzan a través de los comités presupuestarios de la cámara de representantes y del senado. Los proyectos de ley remolque se organizan por área relacionada, como por ejemplo “salud”, “vivienda”, “educación superior” y “seguridad pública”.
De tanto en tanto, los proyectos de ley que avanzan independientemente de la Ley de Presupuesto, y por lo tanto no son proyectos de ley remolque, se pueden considerar parte del marco del presupuesto estatal general. Esto puede incluir, por ejemplo, leyes para aumentar los impuestos o presentar enmiendas constitucionales a los votantes.
Departamento de Finanzas (DOF)
Dirige el desarrollo de las propuestas presupuestarias del gobernador, prepara los documentos presupuestarios del gobernador, atestigua en nombre del gobernador en las audiencias legislativas presupuestarias, desarrolla los pronósticos económicos del gobernador y cumple con varias otras funciones. El director del DOF es el asesor fiscal en jefe del gobernador.
Resumen del presupuesto del gobernador
Presenta el panorama económico y de ingresos públicos del gobernador, destaca las principales iniciativas de política pública incluidas en el presupuesto propuesto por el gobernador y resume los gastos estatales propuestos. El resumen del presupuesto se publica el 10 de enero o antes.
Presupuesto propuesto del gobernador
Proporciona una descripción detallada de los gastos propuestos por el gobernador para el próximo año fiscal, los gastos estimados para el año fiscal en curso y los gastos reales del año fiscal anterior. El presupuesto propuesto se publica el 10 de enero o antes.
Oficina del analista legislativo (LAO)
Oficina independiente y no partidaria que hace investigaciones y análisis sobre asuntos del presupuesto estatal, analiza medidas electorales de alcance estatal y brinda asesoramiento fiscal y de política pública a la asamblea legislativa. La LAO es supervisada por el comité presupuestario legislativo conjunto, que es bipartito.
Veto de elementos específicos
La facultad del gobernador de reducir o eliminar elementos de apropiación específicos a pesar de aprobar porciones de un proyecto de ley. Esta facultad es aplicable a cualquier proyecto de ley que contenga una apropiación, incluso los proyectos de ley presupuestarios y los proyectos de ley relacionados con el presupuesto. La asamblea legislativa puede anular un veto con dos terceras partes del voto en casa cámara.
Revisión de mayo
Publicada a más tardar el 14 de mayo, la revisión de mayo actualiza el panorama económico y de ingresos públicos del gobernador; ajusta los gastos propuestos por el gobernador para reflejar estimaciones y supuestos revisados; revisa, complementa o retira las iniciativas de política pública incluidas en el presupuesto propuesto en enero; y detalla los ajustes a la garantía mínima de financiamiento establecida por la proposición 98 para la educación de jardín de infantes hasta el segundo año de la educación terciaria.
EL MARCO CONSTITUCIONAL
LA CONSTITUCIÓN ESTATAL EXPONE LAS NORMAS DEL PROCESO PRESUPUESTARIO
El gobernador y los legisladores crean el plan anual de gastos del estado conforme a normas delineadas en la Constitución del estado.
Los votantes de California cambian estas normas periódicamente cuando aprueban enmiendas constitucionales que aparecen en la boleta electoral.
Las propuestas de modificar la Constitución del estado se pueden incluir en la boleta electoral a través de una iniciativa de los ciudadanos o a través de la asamblea legislativa.
Una enmienda constitucional entra en efecto si es aprobada por una mayoría simple de los votantes.
TRES PLAZOS DE VENCIMIENTO CLAVES DEL PRESUPUESTO
DOS EN LA CONSTITUCIÓN DEL ESTADO (10 DE ENERO Y 15 DE JUNIO) UNA EN LA LEY ESTATAL (4 DE MAYO)
El gobernador debe proponer un presupuesto para el año fiscal venidero a más tardar el 10 de enero. El presupuesto debe estar balanceado: Los ingresos públicos estimados (según lo determine el gobernador) deben cubrir o superar los gastos propuestos por el gobernador.
El gobernador debe publicar la revisión de mayo a más tardar el 14 de mayo. La asamblea legislativa debe aprobar un proyecto de ley presupuestario para el año fiscal siguiente a más tardar la medianoche del 15 de junio.
El proyecto de ley presupuestario debe estar balanceado: Los ingresos públicos estimados del fondo general (como se expone en el proyecto de ley presupuestario aprobado por la asamblea legislativa) debe cubrir o superar los gastos del fondo general.
PROPOSICIÓN 25: VOTO POR MAYORÍA SIMPLE PARA LOS PROYECTOS DE LEY PRESUPUESTARIOS Y LA MAYORÍA DE LOS PROYECTOS DE LEY REMOLQUE (TRAILER)
El paquete presupuestario, por lo general, puede aprobarse con un voto de mayoría simple en cada cámara de la asamblea legislativa.
La proposición 25 de 2010 permite a los legisladores aprobar, mediante un voto de mayoría simple, tanto los proyectos de ley presupuestarios como los proyectos de ley complementarios, los cuales pueden entrar en vigor tan pronto como el gobernador los firme.
Conforme a las normas de la proposición 25, los proyectos de ley remolque deben (1) incluirse en la lista de la Ley de Presupuesto y (2) contener una apropiación de cualquier monto.
Incluso con la proposición 25, algunos tipos de proyectos de ley remolque que se podrían incluir en el paquete presupuestario requerirán una supermayoría: generalmente dos tercios del voto de cada cámara. Esto incluye, por ejemplo, los proyectos de ley que aumentan los impuestos o enmiendan una ley estatal que fue aprobada por los votantes mediante una iniciativa en la boleta electoral. Sin embargo, la mayoría de los proyectos de ley remolque en el paquete presupuestario solo necesitarán un voto de mayoría simple para ser aprobados.
PROPOSICIÓN 25: SANCIONES POR ATRASO DEL PRESUPUESTO
Los legisladores enfrentan sanciones si no aprueban el proyecto de ley presupuestario a más tardar el 15 de junio.
La proposición 25 exige que los legisladores pierdan de forma permanente tanto su salario como el reembolso de gastos de viaje y manutención por cada día posterior al 15 de junio que se atrase la aprobación del proyecto de ley presupuestario y su envío al gobernador.
Estas sanciones no se aplican a los proyectos de ley relacionados con el presupuesto, los cuales no están obligados a aprobarse a más tardar el 15 de junio.
PROPOSICIÓN 26: VOTO POR SUPERMAYORÍA PARA LOS AUMENTOS DE IMPUESTOS
Todo aumento de impuestos requiere un voto de dos terceras partes de cada cámara de la asamblea legislativa.
Conforme a la Constitución del estado, “todo cambio en el estatuto estatal que causa que un contribuyente pague impuestos más altos” requiere un voto de las dos terceras partes de cada cámara.
Esta norma fue impuesta por la proposición 26 de 2010. Esta medida expandió la definición de un aumento de impuestos y por lo tanto el alcance del requisito del voto de las dos terceras partes, que fue impuesto originalmente por la proposición 13 de 1978.
Antes de la proposición 26, solo los proyectos de ley que cambiaban los impuestos estatales “para el propósito de aumentar los ingresos públicos” requerían un voto de las dos terceras partes. Los proyectos de ley que aumentaban algunos impuestos pero reducían otros por una cantidad equivalente o mayor podían aprobarse mediante una mayoría simple de votos en cada cámara.
PROPOSICIÓN 26: SE CLASIFICAN MÁS CARGOS COMO IMPUESTOS
La proposición 26 de 2010 también expandió la definición de impuesto para incluir algunas tarifas.
Antes de la proposición 26, los legisladores podían crear o aumentar las tarifas mediante un voto de mayoría simple. Estas tarifas aprobadas por mayoría incluían tarifas regulatorias destinadas a abordar problemas de salud, ambientales u otros causados por diversos productos como el alcohol, el petróleo o los materiales peligrosos.
La proposición 26 reclasificó las tarifas regulatorias y algunas otras como impuestos. Por esta razón, ahora se requiere un voto de las dos terceras partes de cada cámara de la asamblea legislativa para muchos cargos que antes se consideraban tarifas y podían aprobarse por voto de mayoría simple.
REQUISITOS ADICIONALES DE VOTO POR SUPERMAYORÍA
La Constitución estatal requiere un voto de dos terceras partes de cada cámara de la asamblea legislativa para:
Apropiar dinero para el fondo general, excepto para las apropiaciones que son para las escuelas públicas o que se incluyen en proyectos de ley presupuestarios o proyectos de ley remolque (trailer).
Aprobar proyectos de ley que entran en vigencia de inmediato (estatutos urgentes), excepto los proyectos de ley presupuestarios y los proyectos de ley remolque (trailer).
Someter enmiendas constitucionales o medidas de bonos de obligación general a la consideración de los votantes.
Anular el veto del gobernador a un proyecto de ley o a un elemento de gasto específico.
PROPOSICIÓN 54: UN PROYECTO DE LEY SE DEBE PUBLICAR DURANTE POR LO MENOS 72 HORAS ANTES DE QUE LA ASAMBLEA LEGISLATIVA PUEDA ACTUAR EN RELACIÓN A ÉL
La proposición 54 de 2016 requiere que los proyectos de ley se distribuyan a los legisladores y se publiquen en internet, en su formato final, al menos 72 horas antes de ser aprobados por la asamblea legislativa.
Esta norma es aplicable a todos los proyectos de ley, incluso el proyecto de ley presupuestario y otras leyes incluidas en el paquete presupuestario.
Este período de revisión obligatorio se puede eximir para un proyecto de ley si:
El gobernador declara una emergencia en respuesta a un desastre o un peligro extremo, y
Las dos terceras partes de los legisladores en la cámara de representantes que consideran el proyecto de ley votan por renunciar al período de revisión.
PROPOSICIÓN 98: UNA GARANTÍA DE FONDOS PARA LAS ESCUELAS DE JARDÍN DE INFANTES AL DÉCIMO SEGUNDO GRADO Y LAS ESCUELAS TERCIARIAS COMUNITARIAS
La proposición 98 de 1988 garantiza un nivel anual mínimo de fondos para la educación de jardín infantes hasta el segundo año de educación terciaria.
El monto garantizado se calcula cada año en base a una de tres pruebas que se aplican conforme a condiciones fiscales y económicas. Dos de estas pruebas incluyen ajustes por cambios en la asistencia a las escuelas primarias y secundarias en todo el estado. Los fondos de la proposición 98 provienen del fondo general y de los ingresos públicos generados por impuestos locales sobre la propiedad.
La asamblea legislativa puede suspender la garantía por un solo año mediante un voto de las dos terceras partes de cada cámara y proporcionar menos fondos. Después de una suspensión, el estado debe aumentar los fondos de la proposición 98 con el paso del tiempo al nivel que hubiera alcanzado si no se hubiera implementado la suspensión.
Aunque la asamblea legislativa puede proveer más fondos de los que requiere la proposición 98, en general, la garantía a servido como un nivel de fondos máximo.
PROPOSICIÓN 2: AHORROS PARA UN DÍA DE LLUVIA, PAGO DE DEUDAS
La proposición 2 de 2014 revisó las reglas que se aplican a la cuenta de estabilización presupuestaria (BSA, por sus siglas en inglés), el fondo constitucional de “emergencia” del estado, y también estableció un nuevo requisito para reducir la deuda presupuestaria del estado.
El estado está obligado a reservar cada año el 1.5% de los ingresos del fondo general, además de dólares adicionales en los años en que los ingresos tributarios provenientes de las ganancias de capital son particularmente elevados.
Hasta 2029-30, la mitad de estos ingresos se deposita en la BSA y la otra mitad debe utilizarse para reducir la deuda presupuestaria del estado, que incluye pasivos no financiados de pensiones. A partir de 2030-31, la totalidad de la transferencia anual se depositará en la BSA.
Los responsables de formular políticas públicas del estado pueden suspender o reducir el depósito en la BSA y retirar fondos de la reserva, pero únicamente en circunstancias limitadas que califiquen como una “emergencia presupuestaria”.
PROPOSICIÓN 2: UNA RESERVA PRESUPUESTARIA PARA LA EDUCACIÓN DE JARDÍN DE INFANTES HASTA EL SEGUNDO AÑO DE EDUCACIÓN TERCIARIA
La proposición 2 de 2014 también creó una reserva para el presupuesto del estado para las escuelas de jardín de infantes al décimo segundo grado llamada la cuenta de estabilización del sistema de escuelas públicas (Public School System Stabilization Account) (PSSSA).
Los depósitos provienen de los ingresos públicos de los impuestos sobre las ganancias de capital cuando esos ingresos son particularmente elevados.
Sin embargo, se deben cumplir varias condiciones antes de poder transferir estos dólares a la PSSSA. Por ejemplo, las transferencias solo pueden ocurrir en los así llamados años “prueba 1” conforme a la proposición 98, que han sido relativamente infrecuentes.
PROPOSICIÓN 55: FONDOS NUEVOS POTENCIALES PARA MEDI-CAL GRACIAS A UN IMPUESTO A LOS CALIFORNIANOS MÁS PUDIENTES
La proposición 55 de 2016 extiende hasta finales de 2030 los aumentos en la tasa de impuestos sobre la renta personales para los californianos con ingresos muy elevados y establece una fórmula para impulsar los fondos para Medi-Cal, que proporciona servicios de atención médica a los californianos con ingresos bajos.
A partir de 2018-19, los ingresos públicos del fondo general, incluso los obtenidos por la proposición 55, deben usarse primero para financiar (1) la garantía anual de la proposición 98 para las escuelas de jardín de infantes a décimo segundo grado y las escuelas terciarias comunitarias, y (2) el costo de otros servicios que fueron autorizados a partir del 1 de enero de 2016, ajustado según los cambios poblacionales, los mandatos federales y otros factores.
Si queda algún ingreso público de la proposición 55 después de cumplir con estos gastos obligatorios, Medi-Cal recibirá el 50% de este exceso, hasta un máximo de $2 billones en cualquier año fiscal.
La proposición 55 aún no ha generado fondos adicionales para Medi-Cal.
PROPOSICIÓN 4: LÍMITE DE APROPIACIONES ESTATALES (STATE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT) (SAL): UN LÍMITE PARA LOS GASTOS
Las apropiaciones están sujetas a un límite establecido por la proposición 4 de 1979, según modificada por iniciativas posteriores. Este límite de gastos se suele denominar el límite Gann.
El SAL limita la cantidad de ganancias por impuestos estatales que se puede apropiar cada año. Este límite se ajusta anualmente según los cambios de población y los ingresos personales por persona.
Algunas apropiaciones de las ganancias impositivas no se cuentan para calcular el límite, como los gastos de servicio de las deudas y los gastos necesarios para cumplir con mandatos judiciales o federales.
Los ingresos públicos que superan el SAL durante un plazo de dos años se dividen por igual entre gastos de la proposición 98 y reembolsos a los contribuyentes. El estado superó por última vez el SAL en 2020-21 (pero no lo hizo el año anterior).
MANDATOS ESTATALES: HAY QUE PAGARLOS O SUSPENDERLOS
El estado está obligado a pagar los mandatos que impone a los gobiernos locales o suspenderlos.
La proposición 4 de 1979 exige que el estado reembolse a los gobiernos locales los costos relacionados con un programa nuevo o un nivel más elevado de servicio exigido por el estado.
La proposición 1A de 2004 expandió la definición de un mandato para incluir la transferencia de responsabilidad financiera del gobierno estatal a los gobiernos locales.
La proposición 1A también requiere que el estado suspenda un mandato todo año en el que los costos de los gobiernos locales no se reembolsen por completo.
¿QUÉ HACEN EL GOBERNADOR Y LA ASAMBLEA LEGISLATIVA?
El gobernador:
Aprueba, modifica o rechaza las propuestas de gastos preparadas por los departamentos y agencias estatales mediante un proceso interno coordinado por el Departamento de Finanzas.
Propone cada enero un plan de gastos para el estado, que se presenta ante la asamblea legislativa como el proyecto de ley presupuestario.
Actualiza y revisa el presupuesto propuesto cada mayo (la «Revisión de mayo»).
Firma o veta los proyectos de ley incluidos en el paquete presupuestario.
Puede vetar la totalidad o una parte de las apropiaciones individuales (partidas presupuestarias), pero no puede aumentar ninguna apropiación por encima del nivel aprobado por la asamblea legislativa.
La asamblea legislativa:
Aprueba, modifica o rechaza las propuestas del gobernador.
Puede agregar gastos nuevos o hacer otros cambios que modifican sustancialmente las propuestas del gobernador.
Necesita una voto de mayoría simple de cada cámara para aprobar los proyectos de ley presupuestarios y la mayor parte de los proyectos de ley remolque (trailer).
Necesita un voto de las dos terceras partes para aprobar ciertos otros proyectos de ley que pueden formar parte del paquete presupuestario, como por ejemplo los proyectos de ley que aumentan los impuestos o proponen enmiendas constitucionales.
Necesita un voto de las dos terceras partes de cada cámara para anular el veto del gobernador de un proyecto de ley o apropiación.
¿QUÉ PASA Y CUÁNDO?
CRONOGRAMA DEL PRESUPUESTO ESTATAL
El proceso del presupuesto estatal es cíclico. Se toman decisiones durante todo el año.
Los departamentos y agencias estatales elaboran presupuestos base para mantener los niveles de servicio existentes en el próximo año fiscal y pueden preparar «propuestas de cambio presupuestario» destinadas a modificar esos niveles de servicio. El Departamento de Finanzas (DOF) revisa estos documentos.
Los departamentos y agencias estatales elaboran presupuestos base para mantener los niveles de servicio existentes en el próximo año fiscal y pueden preparar «propuestas de cambio presupuestario» destinadas a modificar esos niveles de servicio. El Departamento de Finanzas (DOF) revisa estos documentos.
De manera independiente del gobernador, los líderes legislativos elaboran sus prioridades presupuestarias para el próximo año fiscal.
En noviembre, la oficina del analista legislativo (LAO) publica su panorama fiscal, que ofrece la evaluación de la LAO sobre los ingresos públicos, los gastos y la situación general del presupuesto del estado a lo largo de varios años fiscales.
A más tardar el 10 de enero
El gobernador publica el presupuesto propuesto para el año fiscal venidero que comienza el 1 de julio.
Enero a mediados de mayo
Unos pocos días después de la publicación del presupuesto propuesto: La oficina del analista legislativo (LAO) publica su panorama general y su evaluación de las propuestas del gobernador y posteriormente divulga una proyección actualizada de los ingresos.
Finales de enero: El comité presupuestario de la cámara de representantes y el comité presupuestario y de revisión fiscal del senado celebran audiencias generales sobre el presupuesto propuesto por el gobernador.
Finales de febrero hasta principios de mayo: Los subcomités presupuestarios de cada cámara celebran decenas de audiencias para revisar en profundidad las propuestas del gobernador.
A más tardar el 14 de mayo
El gobernador publica un presupuesto modificado (la «revisión de mayo») para el próximo año fiscal, que comienza el 1 de julio.
Mediados de mayo a principios de junio
Pocos días después de la revisión de mayo: La oficina del analista legislativo (LAO) publica su panorama general y su evaluación de la revisión de mayo y posteriormente divulga una proyección actualizada de los ingresos y una perspectiva presupuestaria de varios años.
La semana siguiente a la revisión de mayo: Los subcomités presupuestarios de la cámara de representantes y del senado se reúnen para revisar las propuestas del gobernador incluidas en la revisión de mayo.
Aproximadamente 10 días después de la revisión de mayo: La cámara de representantes y el senado publican resúmenes, denominados «informes de subcomité», de sus versiones del paquete presupuestario.
Aproximadamente dos semanas después de la revisión de mayo: Los líderes de la cámara de representantes y del senado llegan a un acuerdo sobre una versión legislativa unificada del paquete presupuestario y publican resúmenes del acuerdo. Durante muchos años, los líderes legislativos convocaron un comité de conferencia compuesto por demócratas y republicanos para resolver las diferencias entre los planes de gastos de ambas cámaras. Sin embargo, no se ha convocado un comité de conferencia desde 2019.
En esta etapa es posible alcanzar un acuerdo completo con el gobernador, aunque es poco frecuente. No obstante, el paquete presupuestario de la asamblea legislativa reflejará muchos puntos de coincidencia con el gobernador, basados en negociaciones continuas y discretas entre el gobernador y los líderes legislativos.
Un poco más de dos semanas después de la revisión de mayo: La legislatura comienza a redactar el proyecto de ley presupuestario inicial, también conocido como la Ley de Presupuesto. La finalización de la Ley de Presupuesto para las votaciones de todos los miembros de la legislatura puede tardar aproximadamente una docena de días.
A más tardar el 15 de junio
La asamblea legislativa aprueba la Ley de Presupuesto antes del 15 de junio, la fecha límite constitucional, y la envía al gobernador.
Si las dos cámaras han programado votos formales de toda la asamblea legislativa para el 15 de junio, la Ley de Presupuesto se debe publicar en el sitioweb de información legislativa de California a más tardar el 12 de junio para cumplir con el requisito de notificación previa de 72 horas.
Si la asamblea legislativa programa votos de toda la asamblea para una fecha anterior al 15 de junio, la Ley de Presupuesto debe imprimirse antes del 12 de junio para cumplir con la norma de las 72 horas, por ejemplo a más tardar el 10 de junio para hacer la votación con todos los miembros el 13 de junio.
No es obligatorio que los proyectos de ley remolque (trailer), que también forman parte del paquete presupuestario estatal, se aprueben a más tardar el 15 de junio, y raramente lo son. En general, los proyectos de ley remolque (trailer) hacen cambios legales necesarios para implementar las políticas públicas que aparecen en la Ley de Presupuesto.
Segunda mitad de junio
El gobernador y los líderes legislativos continúan negociando con el fin de alcanzar un acuerdo tripartito sobre el paquete presupuestario para el próximo año fiscal.
Una vez que se alcanza un acuerdo, se dan a conocer el resto de los proyectos de ley que conforman el paquete presupuestario, los cuales incluyen múltiples proyectos de ley remolque (trailer) junto con un «proyecto de ley presupuestario junior». Este proyecto de ley presupuestario junior modifica la Ley de Presupuesto aprobada por la asamblea legislativa para reflejar los cambios exigidos por el acuerdo alcanzado con el gobernador.
La cámara de representantes y el senado publican resúmenes del paquete presupuestario del modo acordado con el gobernador.
La asamblea legislativa aprueba el proyecto de ley presupuestario junior y los proyectos de ley remolque (trailer).
Todos los proyectos de ley deben ser firmados dentro de los 12 días de su presentación al gobernador. Sin embargo, si el duodécimo día es un sábado, domingo o feriado, el plazo se extiende hasta el siguiente día que no sea sábado, domingo o feriado.
El gobernador puede reducir o eliminar cualquier elemento de apropiación en cualquier proyecto de ley (el “veto de elementos específicos”).
Los departamentos y agencias del estado se enfocan en el siguiente presupuesto estatal comenzando a preparar el presupuesto propuesto del gobernador para publicarlo a más tardar el 10 de enero. Este proceso que dura meses puede comenzar antes en junio y continúa todo el verano y durante el otoño.
Julio y después
El nuevo año fiscal comienza el 1 de julio.
El gobernador firma los proyectos de ley remolque (trailer) restantes que no se firmaron en junio.
El Departamento de Finanzas publica un resumen del paquete presupuestario de junio firmado y convertido en ley por el gobernador. Este resumen puede publicarse antes del final de junio.
La asamblea legislativa entra en un receso de un mes en verano comenzando alrededor del 3 de julio en los años electorales y a mediados de julio en los años no electorales.
La asamblea legislativa vuelve a reunirse en agosto para las semanas de sesión finales, que concluye en agosto en los años con elecciones y en septiembre en los años que no hay elecciones.
En agosto, los líderes del estado típicamente impulsan cambios en el paquete presupuestario estatal adoptados en junio, incluso por lo menos un proyecto de ley presupuestario junior junto con proyectos de ley remolque adicionales. Estos cambios incluyen ajustes técnicos del presupuesto, como la corrección de errores en la Ley de Presupuesto, así como revisiones sustantivas, a menudo de gran alcance, en materia de gastos y políticas públicas.
La cámara de representantes y el senado publican resúmenes de las revisiones presupuestarias conforme al acuerdo alcanzado con el gobernador.
El comité presupuestario en pleno de cada cámara celebra una sola audiencia sobre las revisiones presupuestarias antes de enviar el paquete las cámaras plenas de la cámara de representantes y del senado para las votaciones finales.
El gobernador firma las revisiones presupuestarias y las convierte en ley en septiembre, o a veces en octubre en los años no electorales, posiblemente con ciertos elementos vetados.
Oficina del analista legislativo: Análisis presupuestarios y de políticas públicas, recomendaciones y datos presupuestarios históricos.
Asesor legislativo: Proyectos de ley y análisis de proyectos de ley, un servicio gratuito de seguimiento de proyectos de ley, los códigos estatales y la Constitución del estado.
Asamblea y senado estatal: Programas y otras publicaciones de los comités, cronogramas de sesiones de la asamblea legislativa y de los comités, el calendario legislativo anual y vídeo en vivo y de archivo de los procedimientos legislativos.
There was a problem processing your signup. Please try again. Or contact us
Please check your email to confirm your signup.
The most common way for Californians to shape state funding decisions and policy priorities is through the state budget process and the legislative (or policy bill) process.
The deadlines for the state budget process are established in California’s Constitution or in state law and rarely change.
In contrast, most of the deadlines for thelegislative process are jointly set by the leadership of the state Senate and Assembly. These deadlines are adjusted annually to reflect the amount of time the Legislature has to complete its business. Specifically:
In non-election (odd-numbered) years, the deadline for the Legislature to pass bills is typically set in September — on a date determined jointly by the Assembly and Senate.
In election (even-numbered) years, the Legislature generally must pass bills by August 31 — a deadline established in the state Constitution. There are a few exceptions to this deadline. For example, after August 31 the Legislature may pass bills calling for elections, bills that would increase or reduce state taxes, and bills that would take effect immediately (“urgency statutes”).
The state budget process and legislative (policy bill) process differ in multiple ways. For example, the legislative process has many more deadlines compared to the state budget process, reflecting the long and linear path that policy bills take through both houses. The legislative process also has more steps and “hoops” to jump through in order to advance legislation to the governor’s desk.
However, there is a key similarity between these two processes. Much of the Legislature’s work on policy bills as well as on the state budget is organized through committees:
In the legislative process, Assembly and Senate policy committees consider the policy implications of a bill, while appropriations committees estimate the cost of policy bills. At each stage of the process, committees can either pass and send policy bills to the floor of each house or hold the bills in committee (where they die).
In the state budget process, Assembly and Senate budget committees and their subcommittees review the governor’s budget proposals, develop each house’s version of the state budget, and pass the budget-related bills that reflect each year’s state budget agreement with the governor.
Committee hearings are open to the public and typically include opportunities for public comment. Members of the public can attend committee hearings in person or watch them online through the Assembly and Senate websites.
The dates in the table below reflect deadlines established in state law and the state Constitution as well as the joint rules set by the Assembly and Senate for 2026.
Every year, California’s governor and Legislature adopt a state budget that provides a framework and funding for critical public services and systems — from child care and health care to housing and transportation to colleges and K-12 schools.
But the state budget is about more than dollars and cents. The budget expresses our values as well as our priorities for Californians and as a state. At its best, the budget should reflect our collective efforts to expand economic opportunities, promote well-being, and improve the lives of Californians who are denied the chance to share in our state’s wealth and who deserve the dignity and support to lead thriving lives.
State budget choices have an impact on all Californians. These decisions affect the quality of our schools and health care, the cost of a college education, families’ access to affordable child care and housing, the availability of services and financial support to help older adults age in place, and so much more.
Because the state budget touches so many services and our everyday lives, it is critical for Californians to understand and participate in the annual budget process to ensure that state leaders are making the strategic choices needed to allow every Californian — from different races, backgrounds, and places — to thrive and share in our state’s economic and social life.
This report sheds light on the state budget and the budget process with the goal of giving Californians the tools they need to effectively engage decision makers and advocate for fair and just policy choices.
Key Takeaways
The Bottom Line
The state spending plan is about more than dollars and cents.
Crafting the budget provides an opportunity for Californians to express our values and priorities as a state.
The state Constitution establishes the rules of the budget process.
Among other things, these rules allow lawmakers to approve spending with a simple majority vote, but require a two-thirds vote to increase taxes. Voters periodically revise the budget process by approving constitutional amendments.
The governor has the lead role in the budget process.
Proposing a state budget for the upcoming fiscal year gives the governor the first word in each year’s budget deliberations.
The May Revision gives the governor another opportunity to set the budget and policy agenda for the state.
Veto power generally gives the governor the last word.
The Legislature reviews and revises the governor’s proposals.
Lawmakers can alter the governor’s proposals and advance their own initiatives as they craft their version of the budget prior to negotiating an agreement with the governor.
Budget decisions are made throughout the year.
The public has various opportunities for input during the budget process.
This includes writing letters of support or opposition, testifying at legislative hearings, and meeting with officials from the governor’s administration as well as with legislators and members of their staff.
In short, Californians have ample opportunity to stay engaged and involved in the budget process year-round.
Key Facts About California’s State Budget
The State Budget = State Funds + Federal Funds
Three Kinds of State Funds
Three kinds of state funds account for almost two-thirds (64.8%) of California’s $495.6 billion budget for 2025-26, the fiscal year that began on July 1, 2025. Specifically:
General Fund — The state General Fund accounts for revenues that are not designated for a specific purpose. Most state support for education, health and human services, and state prisons comes from the General Fund.
Special Funds — Over 500 state special funds account for taxes, fees, and licenses that are designated for a specific purpose.
Bond Funds — State bond funds account for the receipt and disbursement of general obligation (GO) bond proceeds.
Federal funds comprise the rest (35.2%) of the state’s 2025-26 budget.
Most State General Fund and Special Fund Revenue Comes From Three Sources
California’s “big three” taxes
Most state revenue comes from California’s “Big Three” taxes. In 2025-26, General Fund and special fund revenue combined is estimated to total $296.7 billion, with almost 73% ($215.8 billion) expected to come from the Big Three. California’s Big Three taxes are the:
Personal income tax — This is a tax on the income of California residents as well as the income of nonresidents derived from California sources. It is California’s largest source of revenue.
Sales & use tax — This is a tax on the purchase of tangible goods in California (the sales tax) or on the use of tangible goods in California that were purchased elsewhere (the use tax). Services are excluded from the sales and use tax, as are other items exempted by law, including groceries and medications. The sales and use tax is California’s second-largest source of revenue.
Corporation tax — This is a tax imposed on corporations that do business in or derive income from California, with the exception of insurance companies, which instead pay the insurance tax. The corporation tax is California’s third-largest source of revenue.
Other state revenue is estimated to make up more than one-quarter (27.3%) of total projected General Fund and special fund revenue in 2025-26. This other revenue comes from a broad range of sources, including taxes, fees, and fines.
The State Budget is a Local Budget
Dollars spent through the state budget go to individuals, communities, and institutions across California. Under the enacted 2025-26 state budget:
Four-fifths of total spending (80.6%) flows as “local assistance” to K-12 public schools, community colleges, families enrolled in the CalWORKs program, and other essential state services and systems that are operated locally.
Nearly one-fifth of total spending (17.9%) goes to 23 California State University campuses, 10 University of California campuses, over 30 state prisons, and other recipients of “state operations” dollars.
Less than 2% of total spending flows as “capital outlay” dollars, supporting infrastructure projects across California. (Local assistance and state operations dollars also fund infrastructure.)
State Funds Primarily Support Health and Human Services or Education
Under the enacted 2025-26 state budget:
Almost 3 in 4 General Fund and special fund dollars support three categories of spending: health and human services (42%), K-12 education (25.1%), and higher education (7.2%).
More than 5% of General Fund and special fund dollars go to corrections, primarily the state prison system.
The balance of these dollars supports other essential services (such as transportation and environmental protection) and institutions (such as the state’s court system).
Federal Funds Primarily Support Health and Human Services
Under the enacted 2025-26 state budget:
Nearly four-fifths of federal dollars (78.3%) support health and human services programs.
The balance of federal dollars supports other essential services, including labor and workforce development, K-12 education, higher education, and transportation.
The State Budget is Part of a Package of Bills
The state budget never stands alone. Instead, it moves as part of a package of legislation that typically includes two to three dozen bills, and sometimes many more — particularly in years when there is a budget shortfall and state leaders need to make multiple changes to balance the budget. In 2025, Governor Newsom signed nearly 50 budget-related bills.
four kinds of budget-related bills
The budget package consists of two types of budget bills along with trailer bills and other budget-related legislation.
Budget Act — The state budget is formally known as the Budget Act. The Budget Act is the initial budget bill passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the governor. In general, budget bills:
Provide authority to spend money (“appropriations”) across an array of public services and systems for a single year.
Move through the Legislature’s budget committees on their own timeline.
Budget Bill Juniors — This is the informal term for any budget bill that amends the Budget Act, such as by increasing or reducing authorized expenditures. There is no limit on the number of Budget Bill Juniors that may be included in a budget package. This means state leaders can revise the Budget Act as many times as they wish by passing additional budget bills.
Trailer bills — The state budget package also includes trailer bills. Trailer bills generally make changes to state law related to the Budget Act and, like budget bills, move through the Legislature’s budget committees. In addition, trailer bills:
Must contain at least one appropriation and be listed in the Budget Act — a requirement that directly links trailer bills to the state budget.
Are organized by major policy areas in the budget. For example, health-related changes would be included in a “health” trailer bill, housing-related changes would be included in a “housing” trailer bill, etc.
Other budget-related bills — Other bills may be included in the budget package from time to time. These are bills that move independently of the Budget Act (and therefore are not trailer bills) but are still considered part of the state budget framework. This could include, for example, legislation to increase taxes or to place constitutional amendments before the voters as well as bills passed in a special session of the Legislature. This other budget-related legislation can move either through the Legislature’s policy committees or through budget committees.
Assembly Budget Committee and Senate Budget & Fiscal Review Committee
Review the governor’s budget proposals and develop each house’s version of the state budget. Most budget committee work is done through subcommittees that focus on specific policy areas.
Budget Act
The initial budget bill passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the governor, after any line-item vetoes. The Budget Act can be referred to by the year in which it becomes law (“Budget Act of 2026”) or by the fiscal year to which it applies (“2026-27 Budget Act”).
Budget Bill Jr.
The informal term to describe any budget bill that amends the Budget Act. Budget Bill Jrs. may be numbered sequentially using Roman numerals (e.g., Budget Bill Jr. I, Budget Bill Jr. II, etc.).
Budget-Related Bills (“Trailer Bills”)
Generally make changes to state law related to the Budget Act. These bills are formally known as “bills … related to the budget bill,” but are more commonly called “trailer bills.” Trailer bills are listed in the Budget Act and move through the Assembly and Senate budget committees. Trailer bills are organized by issue area, such as “health,” “housing,” “higher education,” and “public safety.”
From time to time, bills that move independently of the Budget Act — and therefore are not trailer bills — may be considered part of the overall state budget framework. This could include, for example, legislation to increase taxes or to place constitutional amendments before the voters.
Department of Finance (DOF)
Leads the development of the governor’s budget proposals, prepares the governor’s budget documents, testifies on behalf of the governor at legislative budget hearings, develops the governor’s economic forecasts, and performs several other functions. The DOF’s director is the governor’s chief fiscal adviser.
Governor’s Budget Summary
Provides the governor’s economic and revenue outlook, highlights major policy initiatives in the governor’s proposed budget, and summarizes proposed state expenditures. The budget summary is released on or before January 10.
Governor’s Proposed Budget
Provides a detailed overview of the governor’s proposed expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year, estimated expenditures for the current fiscal year, and actual expenditures for the prior fiscal year. The proposed budget is released on or before January 10.
Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO)
An independent, nonpartisan office that conducts research and analysis on state budget issues, analyzes statewide ballot measures, and provides fiscal and policy advice to the Legislature. The LAO is overseen by the Legislature’s bipartisan Joint Legislative Budget Committee.
Line-Item Veto
The governor’s power to reduce or eliminate specific items of appropriation while approving other portions of a bill. This power applies to any bill that contains an appropriation, including budget bills and budget-related bills. The Legislature may override a line-item veto with a two-thirds vote of each house.
May Revision
Released on or before May 14, the May Revision updates the governor’s economic and revenue outlook; adjusts the governor’s proposed expenditures to reflect revised estimates and assumptions; revises, supplements, or withdraws policy initiatives that were included in the governor’s proposed budget in January; and outlines adjustments to the Proposition 98 minimum funding guarantee for K-14 education.
The Constitutional Framework
The State Constitution Establishes the Rules of the Budget Process
The governor and legislators craft the state’s annual spending plan according to rules outlined in the state Constitution.
California voters periodically revise these rules by approving constitutional amendments that appear on the statewide ballot.
Proposals to amend the state Constitution can be placed on the ballot through a citizens’ initiative or by the Legislature.
A constitutional amendment takes effect if approved by a simple majority of voters.
Three Key Budget Deadlines
Two in the State Constitution (January 10 and June 15), One in State Law (May 14)
The governor must propose a budget for the upcoming fiscal year on or before January 10. The budget must be balanced: Estimated revenues (as determined by the governor) must meet or exceed the governor’s proposed spending.
The governor must release the May Revision on or before May 14.
The Legislature must pass a budget bill for the upcoming fiscal year by midnight on June 15. The budget bill must be balanced: Estimated General Fund revenues (as set forth in the budget bill passed by the Legislature) must meet or exceed General Fund spending.
Proposition 25: Simple Majority Vote for Budget Bills and Trailer Bills
The budget package generally may be passed by a simple majority vote of each house of the Legislature.
Prop. 25 of 2010 allows lawmakers to pass, by a simple majority vote, budget bills as well as trailer bills that may take effect as soon as the governor signs them.
Under the rules of Prop. 25, trailer bills must (1) be listed in the Budget Act and (2) contain an appropriation of any amount.
Even with Prop. 25, some types of trailer bills that could be included in a budget package will require a supermajority — generally two-thirds — vote of each house. This includes, for example, bills that would raise taxes or amend a state law that was approved by voters via a ballot initiative. However, most trailer bills in the budget package will need only a simple majority vote to pass.
Proposition 25: Penalties for a Late Budget
Lawmakers face penalties if they fail to pass the budget bill on or before June 15.
Prop. 25 requires lawmakers to permanently forfeit both their pay and their reimbursement for travel and living expenses for each day after June 15 that the budget bill is not passed and sent to the governor.
These penalties do not apply to budget-related bills, which do not have to be passed on or before June 15.
Proposition 26: Supermajority Vote for Tax Increases
Any tax increase requires a two-thirds vote of each house of the Legislature.
Under the state Constitution, “any change in state statute which results in any taxpayer paying a higher tax” requires a two-thirds vote of each house.
This standard was imposed by Prop. 26 of 2010. This measure expanded the definition of a tax increase and thus the scope of the two-thirds vote requirement, which was originally imposed by Prop. 13 of 1978.
Prior to Prop. 26, only bills changing state taxes “for the purpose of increasing revenues” required a two-thirds vote. Bills that increased some taxes but reduced others by an equal or larger amount could be passed by a simple majority vote of each house.
Proposition 26: Supermajority Vote for Tax Increases
Prop. 26 of 2010 also expanded the definition of a tax to include some fees.
Prior to Prop. 26, lawmakers could create or increase fees by a simple majority vote. These majority-vote fees included regulatory fees intended to address health, environmental, or other problems caused by various products, such as alcohol, oil, or hazardous materials.
Prop. 26 reclassified regulatory and certain other fees as taxes. As a result, a two-thirds vote of each house of the Legislature is now required for many charges that previously were considered fees and could be passed by a simple majority vote.
Additional Supermajority Vote Requirements
The state Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of each house of the Legislature in order to:
Appropriate money from the General Fund, except for appropriations that are for public schools or that are included in budget bills or in trailer bills.
Pass bills that take effect immediately (urgency statutes), except for budget bills and trailer bills.
Place constitutional amendments or general obligation bond measures before the voters.
Override the governor’s veto of a bill or an item of appropriation.
Proposition 54: A Bill Must Be Published for At Least 72 Hours Before the Legislature Can Act on It
Proposition 54 of 2016 requires bills to be distributed to legislators and published on the Internet, in their final form, at least 72 hours before being passed by the Legislature.
This rule applies to all bills, including the budget bill and other legislation included in the budget package.
This mandatory review period can be waived for a bill if:
The governor declares an emergency in response to a disaster or extreme peril, and
Two-thirds of legislators in the house considering the bill vote to waive the review period.
Proposition 98: A Funding Guarantee for K-12 Schools and Community Colleges
Prop. 98 of 1988 guarantees a minimum annual level of funding for K-14 education.
The amount of the guarantee is calculated each year based on one of three tests that apply under varying fiscal and economic conditions. Two of these tests include adjustments for changes in statewide K-12 attendance. Prop. 98 funding comes from the state General Fund and local property tax revenues.
The Legislature can suspend the guarantee for a single year by a two-thirds vote of each house and provide less funding. Following a suspension, the state must increase Prop. 98 funding over time to the level that it would have reached absent the suspension.
While the Legislature can provide more funding than Prop. 98 requires, the guarantee has generally served as a maximum funding level.
Proposition 2: Saving for a Rainy Day, Paying Down Debt
Prop. 2 of 2014 revised the rules that apply to the Budget Stabilization Account (BSA) — the state’s constitutional rainy day fund — and also established a new requirement to pay down state budgetary debt.
The state is required to set aside 1.5% of General Fund revenues each year, plus additional dollars in years when tax revenues from capital gains are particularly strong.
Until 2029-30, half of the revenues go into the BSA and the other half must be used to pay down state budgetary debt, which includes unfunded pension liabilities. Starting in 2030-31, the entire annual transfer goes into the BSA.
State policymakers may suspend or reduce the BSA deposit and withdraw funds from the reserve, but only under limited circumstances that qualify as a “budget emergency.”
Proposition 2: A Budget Reserve for K-12 Education
Prop. 2 of 2014 also created a state budget reserve for K-12 schools and community colleges called the Public School System Stabilization Account (PSSSA).
Deposits come from state capital gains tax revenues in years when those revenues are particularly strong.
However, various conditions must be met before these dollars could be transferred to the PSSSA. For example, transfers may occur only in so-called “Test 1” years under Prop. 98, which have been relatively rare.
Proposition 55: Potential New Funding for Medi-Cal From a Tax on the Wealthiest Californians
Prop. 55 of 2016 extends, through 2030, personal income tax rate increases on very high-income Californians and establishes a formula to boost funding for Medi-Cal, which provides health care services to Californians with low incomes.
Starting in 2018-19, General Fund revenues — including those raised by Prop. 55 — must first be used to fund (1) the annual Prop. 98 guarantee for K-12 schools and community colleges and (2) the cost of other services that were authorized as of January 1, 2016, as adjusted for population changes, federal mandates, and other factors.
If any Prop. 55 revenues remain after meeting these required expenditures, MediCal would receive 50% of this excess, up to a maximum of $2 billion in any fiscal year.
Prop. 55 has not yet resulted in any additional funding for Medi-Cal.
Proposition 4: State Appropriations Limit (SAL) — A Cap on Spending
Appropriations are subject to a limit established by Prop. 4 of 1979, as modified by later initiatives. This spending cap is known as the Gann Limit.
The SAL limits the amount of state tax proceeds that can be appropriated each year. This limit is adjusted annually for changes in population and per capita personal income.
Some appropriations from tax proceeds do not count toward the limit, including debt service and spending that is needed to comply with court or federal mandates.
Revenues that exceed the SAL over a two-year period are divided equally between Prop. 98 spending and taxpayer rebates. The state last exceeded the SAL in 2020-21 (but did not do so in the prior year).
State Mandates: Pay for Them or Suspend Them
The state must pay for or suspend mandates that it imposes on local governments.
Prop. 4 of 1979 requires the state to reimburse local governments for costs related to a new program or a higher level of service that is mandated by the state.
Prop. 1A of 2004 expanded the definition of a mandate to include the transfer of financial responsibility from the state to local governments.
Prop. 1A also requires the state to suspend a mandate in any year in which local governments’ costs are not fully reimbursed.
What Do the Governor and the Legislature Do?
The Governor
Approves, modifies, or rejects spending proposals prepared by state departments and agencies through an internal process coordinated by the Department of Finance.
Proposes a spending plan for the state each January, introduced as the budget bill in the Legislature.
Updates and revises the proposed budget each May (the “May Revision”).
Signs or vetoes the bills included in the budget package.
Can veto all or part of individual appropriations (line items), but cannot increase any appropriations above the level approved by the Legislature.
The Legislature
Approves, modifies, or rejects the governor’s proposals.
Can add new spending or make other changes that substantially revise the governor’s proposals.
Needs a simple majority vote of each house to pass budget bills and most trailer bills.
Needs a two-thirds vote to pass certain other bills that may be part of the budget package, such as bills that increase taxes or propose constitutional amendments.
Needs a two-thirds vote of each house to override the governor’s veto of a bill or an appropriation.
What Happens When?
The State Budget Timeline
The state budget process is cyclical. Decisions are made throughout the year.
State departments and agencies develop baseline budgets to maintain existing service levels in the upcoming fiscal year and may prepare “budget change proposals” intended to alter service levels. The Department of Finance (DOF) reviews these documents.
Following a series of meetings within the governor’s administration, the governor makes final decisions and the DOF prepares the proposed budget for release in January.
Independent of the governor, legislative leaders develop their budget priorities for the upcoming fiscal year.
In November, the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) releases their Fiscal Outlook, which provides the LAO’s assessment of revenues, spending, and the state’s overall budget condition across several fiscal years.
By January 10
The governor releases the proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year that begins on July 1.
January to Mid-May
A few days after the proposed budget is released: The Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) releases their overview and assessment of the governor’s proposals, and later publishes an updated revenue forecast.
Late January: The Assembly Budget Committee and the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee convene overview hearings on the governor’s proposed budget.
Late February to early May: Budget subcommittees in each house hold dozens of hearings to review the governor’s proposals in depth.
By May 14
The governor releases a revised budget (the May Revision) for the upcoming fiscal year that begins on July 1.
Mid-May to Early June
A few days after the May Revision: The Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) releases their overview and assessment of the May Revision, and later publishes an updated revenue forecast and multiyear budget outlook.
The week after the May Revision: Assembly and Senate budget subcommittees convene to review the governor’s May Revision proposals.
Roughly 10 days after the May Revision: The Assembly and Senate publish summaries — “subcommittee reports” — of their versions of the budget package.
Roughly two weeks after the May Revision:
Assembly and Senate leaders reach a deal on a unified legislative version of the budget package and publish summaries of the agreement. For many years, legislative leaders convened a conference committee composed of Democrats and Republicans to resolve differences between the two houses’ spending plans. However, a conference committee has not been convened since 2019.
A full deal with the governor at this stage is possible, but rare. Nonetheless, the Legislature’s budget package will reflect many points of agreement with the governor based on ongoing, behind-the-scenes negotiations between the governor and legislative leaders.
Somewhat more than two weeks after the May Revision:
The Legislature begins drafting the initial budget bill, also known as the Budget Act. Finalizing the Budget Act for floor votes can take roughly a dozen days.
By June 15
The Legislature passes the Budget Act by June 15 — the constitutional deadline — and sends it to the governor.
If the two houses have scheduled floor votes for June 15, the Budget Act must be published on the California Legislative Information website by June 12 to meet the 72-hour bill-in-print requirement.
If the Legislature schedules floor votes before June 15, the Budget Act must be in print prior to June 12 to comply with the 72-hour rule — for example, by June 10 for floor votes on June 13.
Trailer bills, which are also part of the state budget package, are not required to be — and rarely are — passed by June 15.
Trailer bills generally make statutory changes needed to implement the policies assumed in the Budget Act.
Second Half of June
The governor and legislative leaders continue negotiating in order to reach a three-party deal on the budget package for the upcoming fiscal year.
Once a deal is reached, the rest of the bills in the budget package are unveiled, consisting of multiple trailer bills along with a “Budget Bill Jr.” The Budget Bill Jr. amends the Budget Act as passed by the Legislature in order to reflect the changes required by the deal with the governor.
The Assembly and Senate publish summaries of the budget package as agreed to with the governor.
The Legislature passes the Budget Bill Jr. and trailer bills.
The governor signs the Budget Act, the Budget Bill Jr., and the trailer bills (some trailer bills might not be signed until early July).
All bills must be signed within 12 days of being presented to the governor. However, if the 12th day is a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday, the period is extended to the next day that is not a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday.
The governor may reduce or eliminate any item of appropriation in any bill (the “line-item veto”).
State departments and agencies focus on the next state budget by beginning to prepare the governor’s proposed budget for release by January 10. This months-long process may begin earlier in June and continues through the summer and into the fall.
July and Beyond
The new state fiscal year begins on July 1.
The governor signs any remaining trailer bills that weren’t signed in June.
The Department of Finance publishes a summary of the June budget package as signed into law by the governor. This summary may be published before the end of June.
The Legislature breaks for a one-month summer recess starting around July 4 in election years and around mid-July in non-election years.
The Legislature reconvenes in August for the final few weeks of session, which ends in August in election years and in September in non-election years.
In August, state leaders typically advance changes to the state budget package adopted in June, including at least one Budget Bill Jr. along with additional trailer bills. The changes include budget “clean-up,” such as correcting errors in the Budget Act, as well as substantive — often major — revisions to spending and policy.
The Assembly and Senate publish summaries of the budget revisions as agreed to with the governor.
The full budget committee in each house holds a single hearing on the budget revisions before sending the package to the Assembly and Senate floors for final votes.
The governor signs the budget revisions into law in September — or sometimes October in non-election years — possibly with line-item vetoes.
Legislative Counsel: Bills and bill analyses, a free bill-tracking service, the state codes, and the state Constitution.
State Assembly and Senate: Committee agendas and other publications, floor session and committee schedules, the annual legislative calendar, and live and archived video streaming of legislative proceedings.
SACRAMENTO, CA — In response to the Legislative Analyst’s Office’s (LAO) 2026-27 Fiscal Outlook, the California Budget & Policy Center (Budget Center), a nonpartisan research and analysis nonprofit, issued the following statement from its budget director, Scott Graves: “Despite higher income tax collections, the LAO’s 2026–27 Fiscal Outlook estimates that California still faces an $18 … Continued
What’s the difference between a trailer bill and a policy bill? A surplus and an operating surplus? Special funds and the General Fund? And what exactly is a “Budget Bill Jr.”? Understanding these and other key budget-related terms is critical to navigating the California state budget process and effectively engaging decision-makers in order to advocate for fair and just policy choices for communities across the state.
The administration refers to the agencies, departments, and other entities that make up California’s executive branch. Sometimes called the “governor’s administration.”
A Pages
California budget analysts and policymakers sometimes use the term A Pages to refer to the content of the governor’s budget summary (GBS). Up to the late 1970s, the content of what eventually became the GBS was included in the “A” section of a larger state budget publication. The pages of this A section were numbered A-1, A-2, A-3, etc. As a result, this budget content became known as the A Pages — a term that has remained in use decades after the GBS was established as a separate publication and the A Pages were phased out.
Appropriation
An appropriation authorizes California agencies, departments, and other entities to spend money or create obligations from a specific fund for a specific purpose. Under the California state budget process, only budget bills may contain more than a single item of appropriation.
Assembly Budget Committee
The Assembly Budget Committee reviews the governor’s budget proposals and develops the Assembly’s version of the California state budget. Most of the committee’s work is done through subcommittees that focus on specific policy areas.
Augmentation
An augmentation is an increase to a previously authorized appropriation.
Balanced-Budget Requirement
California’s balanced-budget requirement is a constitutional mandate for estimated revenues to equal or exceed estimated spending. It applies both to the governor’s proposed budget and to the budget bill as passed by the Legislature.
Baseline Budget
See Workload Budget.
Baseline Change
Baseline changes are adjustments to spending or revenue that occur automatically under current California law or policy and therefore do not require legislative action to take effect.
Big Three (decision makers)
The “Big Three” refers to the top elected California officials who negotiate and make final decisions on the statebudget package: the governor, the Assembly Speaker, and the Senate President pro Tempore.
Big Three (revenue sources)
The “Big Three” refers to California’s top sources of state revenue: the personal income tax (largest), the sales & use tax (second-largest), and the corporation tax (third-largest).
Bond Bill
A bond bill is a California legislative bill authorizing the sale of general obligation bonds.
Bond Funds
Bond funds are California state funds that account for the receipt and disbursement of proceeds from general obligation bonds.
Budget Act
The Budget Act is the initial budget bill passed by the California Legislature and signed into law by the governor, after any line-item vetoes. The Budget Act can be referred to by the year in which it becomes law (“Budget Act of 2025”) or by the fiscal year to which it applies (“2025-26 Budget Act”).
Budget Ask
A budget ask is a request for a budget expenditure from an advocacy organization or a member of the California Legislature. A budget ask is usually directed to the Assembly Budget Committee or the Senate Budget & Fiscal Review Committee. Budget asks can also be directed to the governor’s administration, in which case the ask would typically come from an advocacy organization.
Budget Agreement
See Budget Package.
Budget Bill
A budget bill is a California legislative bill that provides authority to spend money (appropriations) across an array of public services and systems for a single fiscal year. Each year’s budget package typically contains multiple budget bills, including the Budget Act and at least one Budget Bill Jr. Budget bills move through the California Legislature’s budget committees rather than through the Legislature’s policy bill process. The Legislature can pass budget bills with a simple majority vote of each house.
Budget Bill Jr.
Budget Bill Jr. is the informal term for any budget bill that amends California’sBudget Act. Multiple Budget Bill Jrs. are sometimes described using Roman numerals (Budget Bill Jr. I, Budget Bill Jr. II, etc.).
Budget Bill Provisional Language
Budget bill provisional language explains how appropriations in the Budget Act must be administered, such as by specifying constraints on expenditures or providing additional or exceptional authority. Provisional language is inserted after an appropriation, or a set of appropriations, and is distinct from the control sections in California’s Budget Act.
Budget Change Proposal (BCP)
A budget change proposal is a recommendation by a California agency, department, or other entity to revise a currently authorized level of service, create a program, or eliminate a program. BCPs that are approved by the governor and submitted to the California Legislature for consideration are posted to the Department of Finance website.
Budget Conference Committee
A budget conference committee is a small group of legislators from both houses who work to reconcile differences between the Assembly and Senate versions of the California budget. Members are appointed by the leadership of each house, typically in late May or early June, with the majority party controlling most of the allotted seats. Lawmakers do not have to form a conference committee to create a unified legislative budget. Instead, they may reconcile differences through private negotiations, which may or may not include the participation of the minority party.
Budget Package
The budget package is the combined set of budget bills and trailer bills — potentially numbering into the dozens — that make up the California budget for a fiscal year. The Legislature typically sends the initial set of bills in the budget package to the governor in late June and sometimes early July. Additional budget-related legislation is enacted at other times during the fiscal year, thus increasing the size and scope of the initial California budget package. From time to time, bills that move independently of the Budget Act — and therefore are not trailer bills — may be considered part of the budget package. This could include, for example, legislation to place a constitutional amendment before the voters.
Budget Problem/Shortfall
See Deficit.
Budget Stabilization Account (BSA)
The Budget Stabilization Account is California’s main state budget reserve. Deposits into and withdrawals from the BSA are governed by rules added to the state Constitution by Proposition 2 (2014). The BSA is commonly referred to as the state’s “rainy day fund.”
Budget Window
The budget window refers to the three-year period that California policymakers focus on when developing the state budget; specifically, the prior fiscal year, the current fiscal year, and the upcoming fiscal year (the budget year). See also Multiyear Window.
Budget Year
The budget year is California’s upcoming state fiscal year, which begins on July 1. See also Current Year.
Capital Outlay
Capital outlay expenditures in California include state spending used to acquire land; construct, modify, or expand buildings; and/or purchase construction-related equipment. Certain types of capital outlay expenditures — including for housing-related projects — are excluded from appropriations that are subject to California’s state spending cap (Gann Limit).
Constitutional Amendment
A constitutional amendment is a resolution to change the language of the California Constitution. Such resolutions require a two-thirds vote of each house of the California Legislature and must be approved by voters in a statewide election (simple majority vote). Constitutional amendments also can be placed on a statewide ballot through the initiative process, thus bypassing the Legislature. On rare occasions, legislative proposals to amend the state Constitution may be integral to the state budget framework, and in these cases would typically be recognized as part of the overall budget package.
Continuing Appropriation
A continuing appropriation is an appropriation for a specific amount in the Californiabudget that is available for more than a single year. Not to be confused with continuous appropriation.
Continuous Appropriation
A continuous appropriation is an expenditure that is authorized by the California Constitution or by state law that is renewed each year without additional action by the Legislature. Not to be confused with continuing appropriation.
Control Sections
Control sections are the individual sections of the CaliforniaBudget Act, beginning with 1.00. Control sections define the terms used in the budget, identify restrictions on appropriations, and provide other instructions and information related to the budget.
Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA)
A cost-of-living adjustment revises spending (usually upward) to reflect the change in California’s cost of living. The Legislature and the governor may provide “discretionary” COLAs through the annual state budget process. In contrast, “statutory” COLAs are required by state law. However, the Legislature may suspend a statutory COLA for a fiscal year by a simple majority vote of each house.
Cost Shift
A cost shift is a budget solution that generates savings in the near term, but creates a binding obligation or higher costs for California in the longer term. Cost shifts can be similar to borrowing but often are not explicitly structured as borrowing. Examples include 1) taking out loans from special funds to temporarily pay for services typically supported with General Fund dollars and 2) deferring one month of state employee payroll to the following fiscal year in order to generate temporary state budget savings. Compare to Fund Shift.
Want to Better Understand the State Budget?
The Budget Center’s essential resources for understanding and navigating the California state budget — all in one place.
Explore tools, videos, and expert insights designed to strengthen your advocacy and guide informed decision-making.
The current year refers to California’s present fiscal year, which ends on June 30. See also Budget Year.
Deficit
A deficit occurs when California’s state budget expenditures exceed resources under current law and policy. In contrast to an operating deficit, which applies to a single fiscal year, the term “deficit” is generally used in assessments of California’s fiscal condition over multiple fiscal years.
Delay
A delay is a budget solution that moves previously appropriated funding to a future fiscal year. This approach is often used to close a California budget deficit because it results in a temporary spending reduction. However, delayed amounts are subject to future legislative decisions, and there is no guarantee that the funding will actually be provided.
Department of Finance (DOF)
The California Department of Finance leads the development of the governor’s budget proposals, prepares the governor’s budget documents, testifies on behalf of the governor at budget committee hearings, develops economic and demographic forecasts, and performs several other functions. The DOF’s director (Director of Finance) is the governor’s chief fiscal advisor.
Early Action
Early action refers to budget decisions that are made before June, when the Californiabudget package is typically finalized. For example, early action on the budget can occur during the winter or spring prior to the start of the new fiscal year (July 1).
Enacted Budget
The enacted budget is the initial set of bills in the Californiabudget package as passed by the Legislature and approved by the governor. The Legislature typically sends these bills to the governor in late June and sometimes early July.
Enactment
Enactment occurs when a bill is passed by both houses of the California Legislature and signed by the governor — or allowed to become law without the governor’s signature. In other words, these bills are “enacted into law.”
Encumbrance
An encumbrance reflects the obligation of a Californiaappropriation, in whole or in part.Examples include an unfulfilled purchase order or an outstanding contract. Outstanding encumbrances recognize commitments that will be recorded as spending when goods or services are received. The purpose of an encumbrance is to prevent an appropriation from being overspent.
Finance Letters
Finance Letters are proposals from the Department of Finance to revise the governor’s proposed budgetsubmitted to the Legislature in January. These requested changes are outlined in letters from the Director of Finance to the chairpersons of the Assembly Budget Committee and the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee. Finance Letters are due to the Legislature by April 1, May 1, or May 14, depending on the subject matter.
Fiscal Year
California’s fiscal year is the 12-month period (July 1 to June 30) during which the state budget is in effect.
Fund Shift
A fund shift is a California budget solution that moves costs usually paid with General Fund dollars to other fund sources, such as a special fund. This action displaces spending that the other fund source would have otherwise supported, and therefore results in lower overall state spending. Examples include 1) shifting spending for certain programs from the General Fund to the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund and 2) using revenue from a special tax on managed care organizations to reduce General Fund spending on Medi-Cal health care services. Compare to Cost Shift.
Gann Limit
The Gann Limit, also known as the State Appropriations Limit, is a constitutional spending cap established in 1979 through voter approval of Proposition 4. It restricts the growth of certain appropriations from tax proceeds in California. At the state level, the Gann Limit is based on 1978-79 spending and is adjusted annually for changes in population and per capita personal income. (The limit works differently for local governments.) If the state limit is exceeded over two consecutive years, half of the revenue above the limit goes to taxpayers and the other half goes to K-12 schools and community colleges.
General Fund
The General Fund is California’s major operating fund, which accounts for revenues that are not designated for a specific purpose. The three major sources of General Fund revenues are the state personal income tax, the state sales and use tax, and the state corporation tax. Most General Fund expenditures go toward K-12 and higher education, health and human services programs, and the state prison system.
General Obligation (GO) Bonds
General obligation bonds are funds borrowed from investors generally to finance infrastructure projects in California. Repayment of GO bonds typically comes from the state’s General Fund and, in all cases, is guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the state. GO bonds require a two-thirds vote of each house of the California Legislature and must be approved by voters in a statewide election (simple majority vote). GO bonds may also be placed on the ballot through the initiative process, thus bypassing the Legislature. See also Lease-Revenue Bonds.
Governor’s Budget Summary
The governor’s budget summary provides the governor’s economic and revenue outlook, highlights major policy initiatives in the governor’s proposed budget, and summarizes proposed expenditures through the California budget. The governor’s budget summary is released — along with the proposed budget — on or before January 10.
Governor’s Proposed Budget
The governor’s proposed budget provides the governor’s recommended spending for California’s upcoming fiscal year, estimated expenditures for the current fiscal year, and actual expenditures for the prior fiscal year. The proposed budget is released — along with the governor’s budget summary — on or before January 10.
Jailbreak
In the context of the California state budget process, a jailbreak occurs when a legislator whose policy bill has been rejected or held by a legislative committee tries to have the bill — or key parts of the bill — included in the state budget package. This practice is generally discouraged by the Legislature’s budget committees.
January 10
January 10 is California’s constitutional deadline for the governor to propose a budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The budget bill, as prepared by the Department of Finance, reflects the governor’s proposal and is introduced immediately into each house of the Legislature by the chairpersons of the Assembly Budget Committee and the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee.
June 15
June 15 is California’s constitutional deadline for the Legislature to pass the initial budget bill for the upcoming fiscal year. If lawmakers miss this deadline, they permanently forfeit both their pay and their reimbursement for travel and living expenses (“per diem”) for each day after June 15 that the budget is not passed and sent to the governor. Budget-related trailer bills do not have to be passed by June 15.
Lease-Revenue Bonds
Lease-revenue bonds are funds borrowed from investors generally to finance infrastructure projects. They are repaid with lease payments — typically General Fund dollars — made by California agencies that use the facilities they finance. These facilities include prisons, courthouses, and university buildings. Lease-revenue bonds are not guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the state. They require a simple majority vote of each house of the California Legislature, but do not need voter approval. See also General Obligation Bonds.
Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO)
The Legislative Analyst’s Office is an independent, nonpartisan office that conducts research and analysis on California state budget issues, analyzes statewide ballot measures, and provides fiscal and policy advice to the Legislature. The LAO is overseen by the Legislature’s bipartisan Joint Legislative Budget Committee.
Line-Item Veto
The line-item veto is the California governor’s power to reduce or eliminate specific items of appropriation while approving other portions of a bill. The governor must offer reasons for any items that are reduced or eliminated. The Legislature may override a line-item veto with a two-thirds vote of each house. See also Veto.
Local Assistance
Local assistance refers to California budget expenditures that support local governments or other locally operated activities.
May 14
May 14 is the deadline for the governor to release a revised California budget plan, which is known as the May Revision.
May Revision
The May Revision, released on or before May 14, updates the governor’s economic and revenue outlook for California; adjusts the governor’s proposed expenditures to reflect revised estimates and assumptions; revises, supplements, or withdraws policy initiatives that were included in the governor’s proposed budget in January; and outlines adjustments to the minimum funding guarantee for K-14 education required by Proposition 98 (1988).
Multiyear Projection (“the Multiyear”)
The multiyear projection — often called “the multiyear” — is an analysis of California’sGeneral Fund condition, focusing on the current fiscal year, the budget year, and the three fiscal years that follow (the multiyear window). The Department of Finance is constitutionally required to produce the multiyear projection three times per year — first with the governor’s proposed budget, then with the May Revision, and finally following the enactment of the annual budget package. Commonly called “the multiyear” by Capitol insiders.
Multiyear Window
The multiyear window is the three-year period that follows California’sbudget year. For example, if 2026-27 is the budget year, then the multiyear window consists of 2027-28, 2028-29, and 2029-30. State budget projections often focus on the multiyear window. For example, the Legislative Analyst’s Office highlights the multiyear window in their annual assessment of the state’s fiscal condition (the “Fiscal Outlook”). In addition, the Department of Finance focuses on the multiyear window in their multiyear projection. Compare to Budget Window.
Related Content
See our report Dollars and Democracy: A Guide to the California State Budget Process to learn more about the state budget and budget process.
A NASCAR letter features dozens of logos representing the advocacy organizations who signed the letter. In the context of the California state budget process, a NASCAR letter urges support for or opposition to specific policy and/or funding proposals. These letters are typically sent to the governor and to influential legislators, such as the chairs of key budget subcommittees.
One-Time Cost
A one-time cost is a proposed or actual expenditure in California that is non-recurring — usually reflected only in a single annual budget — and is not permanently included in the baseline budget.
Operating Deficit
An operating deficit occurs when expenditures for a fiscal year exceed revenues for that same fiscal year under current California law and policy. “Revenues” excludes any balance, positive or negative, carried in from the prior fiscal year.
Operating Surplus
An operating surplus occurs when revenues for a fiscal year exceed expenditures for that same fiscal year under current California law and policy. “Revenues” excludes any balance, positive or negative, carried in from the prior fiscal year. An operating surplus provides policymakers with discretionary revenues to allocate through the state budget process. However, the existence of an operating surplus does not indicate that Californians’ needs have been fully met or that additional state investments are unnecessary. In fact, an operating surplus may result — at least in part — from maintaining spending cuts that were made in prior fiscal years, which leaves spending lower than it otherwise would be and thus contributes to the operating surplus.
Policy Bill
A policy bill is a proposed change to California law that is reviewed by the Legislature’s policy committees and, if required, by appropriations committees to estimate the cost of the proposal. In general, policy bills need only a simple majority vote of each house and take effect on the following January 1 if signed by the governor or allowed to become law without a signature. A policy bill may take effect immediately if it receives a two-thirds vote of each house (“urgency statute”). On rare occasions, policy bills may be integral to the state budget framework, and in these cases would typically be recognized as part of the overall budget package.
Projected Surplus Temporary Holding Account
The Projected Surplus Temporary Holding Account is a California state reserve that is intended to temporarily hold a projected state budget surplus for use in future fiscal years. The Legislature and governor created this reserve in 2024. State leaders have significant flexibility in determining whether to deposit funds into the reserve and how to use those funds.
Proposition 2 (2014)
Proposition 2 governs deposits into and withdrawals from California’sBudget Stabilization Accountas well as the Public School System Stabilization Account. Prop. 2 also requires the state to pay down certain debts. Funding for these two reserves and for the debt payments comes from state General Fund revenue based on formulas in the California Constitution.
Proposition 25 (2010)
Proposition 25 allows the California Legislature to pass budget bills and certain trailer bills by a simple majority vote of each house. Bills passed under the rules of Prop. 25 take effect immediately upon being signed by the governor or on a date specified in the legislation. To qualify as a Prop. 25 trailer bill, the bill must be identified in the budget bill and contain an appropriation of any amount. Bills that require a supermajority vote of the Legislature — such as a bill to increase a tax — cannot be passed as Prop. 25 majority-vote trailer bills, although they still may move through budget committees along with other trailer bills.
Proposition 26 (2010)
Proposition 26 requires a two-thirds vote of each house of the California Legislature to increase any tax. Prop. 26 also expanded the definition of a tax to include some charges that were previously considered “fees” and could be passed by a simple majority vote of each house. These redefined “taxes” require a two-thirds vote of each house.
Proposition 54 (2016)
Proposition 54 requires bills to be distributed to legislators and published on the internet, in their final form, at least 72 hours before being passed by the California Legislature. This rule applies to all bills, including bills that are part of the budget package.
Proposition 98 (1988)
Proposition 98 guarantees a minimum annual level of funding for California’s K-12 schools and community colleges. The amount of the guarantee is calculated each year using one of three tests that apply under varying fiscal and economic conditions. Two of these tests include adjustments for changes in statewide K-12 attendance. Prop. 98 funding comes from the state General Fund as well as from local property tax dollars.
Public School System Stabilization Account (PSSSA)
The Public School System Stabilization Account is a state budget reserve for California’s K-12 schools and community colleges. Deposits into and withdrawals from the PSSSA are based on rules added to the state Constitution by Proposition 2 (2014).
Rainy Day Fund
See Budget Stabilization Account (BSA).
Reduction
A reduction is an action to spend less money than what has been established under current California law or policy. Also known as a spending cut.
Resources
Resources are the funding available to support state programs and services, typically from the General Fund. In assessments of the state’s fiscal condition, resources consist of three major components: 1) revenue projected to be generated in a specific fiscal year; 2) the balance, positive or negative, projected to be carried in from the prior fiscal year; and 3) transfers to or from the state’s constitutional rainy day fund (the Budget Stabilization Account) that are required by current California law or policy.
Revenue
Revenue consists of funds received by California, generally derived from taxes, licenses, fees, or investment earnings. Revenues are deposited into specific funds and are not available for expenditure until appropriated.
Reversion
A reversion is the return of the unused portion of an appropriation to the fund from which the appropriation was made. This return typically occurs two years after the last day of an appropriation’s availability period (or four years in the case of federal funds). Funds may be reverted more quickly with legislative action. In addition, the Department of Finance may order a reversion. See also Sweep.
Safety Net Reserve
The Safety Net Reserve is aGeneral Fund reserve created in 2018 to help pay for higher state costs in the CalWORKs and Medi-Cal programs during recessions.
Score
The term score has several closely related meanings, including “to account for,” “to count,” and “to estimate.” Examples:
“The new refundable tax credit is scored as a revenue reduction.”
“The May Revision scores $200 million in savings from closing a prison.”
“The costs are scored to the 2026-27 fiscal year.”
Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee
The California Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee reviews the governor’s budget proposals for the upcoming fiscal year and develops the Senate’s version of California’s state budget. Most of the committee’s work is done through subcommittees that focus on specific policy areas.
Solution
A solution is a proposal or action to close a California state budget deficit. Solutions include, but are not limited to, revenue increases, spending reductions, spending delays, cost shifts, fund shifts, and reversions.
Special Funds
Special funds are California state funds that account for taxes, fees, and licenses that are designated for a specific purpose. The state has more than 500 special funds.
Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties (SFEU)
The Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties is California’s discretionary General Fund budget reserve. The SFEU serves as a buffer against unanticipated revenue shortfalls or spending increases. The reserve level is equal to the difference between General Fund resources and General Fund expenditures in a fiscal year. Due to California’s constitutional balanced-budget requirement, the projected SFEU balance cannot be less than zero at the time the budget is adopted. If revenues come in lower than projected or spending unexpectedly rises, the SFEU balance will decline and can become negative if spending exceeds revenues.
State Appropriations Limit
See Gann Limit.
State Operations
State operations spending supports key functions of California’s state government. For example, state support for the California State University and the University of California as well as for the state prison system primarily consists of state operations funding.
Statute
A statute is a law that has been formally approved and recorded; an enacted bill. See also Enactment.
Subventions
A subventiontypically refers to money that is spent as local assistance and allocated based on a formula, rather than being provided selectively as grants.
Surplus
A surplus occurs when California’s statebudgetresources exceed expenditures under current law and policy. In contrast to an operating surplus, which applies to a single fiscal year, the term “surplus” is generally used in assessments of the state’s fiscal condition over multiple fiscal years. A surplus provides policymakers with discretionary revenues to allocate through the California state budget process. However, the existence of a surplus does not indicate that Californians’ needs have been fully met or that additional state investments are unnecessary. In fact, a surplus may result — at least in part — from maintaining spending cuts that were made in prior fiscal years, which leaves spending lower than it otherwise would be and thus contributes to the surplus.
Sweep
Sweep refers to the act of pulling back an appropriation that was previously provided to a California agency, department, or other state entity; essentially, a less formal way of referring to a reversion. Example: “The budget package sweeps unspent child care funding to help close the deficit.”
Tax Expenditure
A tax expenditure is an exception to “normal tax law” that reduces the revenue that governments would otherwise collect. Tax expenditures include, but are not limited to, exemptions, deductions, exclusions, tax credits, deferrals, elections, and preferential tax rates. Tax expenditures are commonly referred to as tax breaks, tax loopholes, or tax preferences.
Federal Policy
The federal government plays a major role in shaping California’s budget, economy, and the well-being of its people.
Learn how federal policies shape California’s budget, economy, and vital programs — and how state leaders can respond to protect and support Californians.
A trailer bill generally makes changes to state law needed to implement the policies assumed in the Budget Act. For example, if the Budget Act includes funding for a new program, the details of the program would be outlined in a trailer bill. Trailer bills move through the California State Assembly and Senate budget committees, with each bill addressing a specific policy area, such as health, housing, higher education, or transportation. The Department of Finance is required to post trailer bill language that is needed to implement the governor’s proposed budget by February 1.
Under rules established by Proposition 25 (2010), California trailer bills generally can be passed by a simple majority vote of each house of the Legislature and take effect immediately upon being signed by the governor. The only requirements for Prop. 25 trailer bills are that they (1) be listed in the Budget Act and (2) contain an appropriation of any amount. Still, even with Prop. 25, some types of trailer bills require a supermajority — generally two-thirds — vote of each house. This includes, for example, trailer bills that would raise taxes or amend a state law that was approved by voters through a ballot initiative. However, most trailer bills in a budget package will need only a simple majority vote to pass.
Trigger
A trigger is aCalifornia state budget mechanism that is typically used to reduce certain expenditures automatically if revenues fail to reach a predetermined target. A trigger also can be used to automatically increase certain expenditures if revenues exceed a set level.
Unanticipated Revenue
Unanticipated revenue occurs when California state revenue collections are expected to exceed prior projections, such as the revenue forecast included in the enacted budget. Not to be confused with surplus.
Veto
A veto is the governor’s power to reject a bill by returning it with any objections to the house of origin. The California Legislature may override a veto by passing the bill with a two-thirds vote of each house. See also Line-Item Veto.
Workload Budget
The workload budget estimates how much California’scurrently authorized services will cost in the upcoming fiscal year. To determine the workload budget, current-year costs are adjusted to reflect changes in student enrollment, program caseloads, and the prison population; statutory cost-of-living adjustments; recently enacted legislation; expenditures required by court orders or by the federal government; one-time expenditures; and several other factors. A workload budget is also known as a baseline budget.
There was a problem processing your signup. Please try again. Or contact us
Please check your email to confirm your signup.
Join the Dollars & Democracy budget training to strengthen your understanding of the state budget process and prepare for 2026.
Watch the recording
About this event
Tune in to Dollars & Democracy, the Budget Center’s premier state budget training, followed by a panel discussion that will help you understand and effectively engage in the California state budget process.
This training is designed for advocates who are new to the field or want to refresh their understanding of the state budget process. We’ll break down California’s budget process, highlighting key deadlines and the essential role the governor, Legislature, and advocates play in advancing community investments.
After the training, stay for a panel discussion with state budget experts who will share practical advocacy strategies and insights into what’s ahead for 2026.
Budget Trainer
Dollars and Democracy training
Nishi Nair, Research Associate, California Budget & Policy Center
Discussion Panel
Looking ahead and what to expect in 2026
Sasha Feldstein, Strategy & Impact Director, California Budget & Policy Center
Tiyesha Watts, Associate Director of Policy Advocacy, California Housing Partnership
Edgar Ortiz, Supervisory Policy Manager, Economic Justice, California Immigrant Policy Center
About the California Budget & Policy Center
The California Budget & Policy Center (Budget Center) is a nonpartisan research and analysis nonprofit advancing public policies that expand opportunities and promote well-being for all Californians.
Want to Better Understand the State Budget?
The Budget Center’s essential resources for understanding and navigating the California state budget — all in one place.
Explore tools, videos, and expert insights designed to strengthen your advocacy and guide informed decision-making.
There was a problem processing your signup. Please try again. Or contact us
Please check your email to confirm your signup.
This website uses cookies to analyze site traffic and to allow users to complete forms on the site. The California Budget & Policy Center does not share, trade, sell, or otherwise disclose personal information. By using our website you agree to our Privacy Policy.